Thulium

Thulium
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:传统上,出于安全考虑,双侧尿石症治疗涉及分阶段干预.最近的研究表明,同坐双侧逆行肾内手术(SSB-RIRS)是有效的,并发症发生率可接受。然而,关于该程序的最佳激光没有明确的数据。这项研究旨在评估SSB-RIRS在多中心现实世界实践中比较thu光纤激光器(TFL)和高功率钬:钇铝石榴石(Ho:YAG)激光器的结果。
    方法:对2015年1月至2022年6月在全球21个中心接受SSB-RIRS的患者进行了回顾性分析。记录围手术期及术后3个月的预后,关注并发症和结石发生率(SFR)。
    结果:共纳入733例患者,第1组(Ho:YAG)为415,第2组(TFL)为318。两组都具有相似的人口统计学和结石特征。第1组的症状性疼痛或血尿发生率更高(26.5%vs.10.4%)。操作和激射时间相当。第1组篮子的使用率更高(47.2%vs.18.9%,p<0.001)。术后并发症和住院时间相似。第2组具有较高的总体SFR。多元回归分析表明,年龄,下极有石头,结石直径与双侧无结石的几率较低有关,而TFL与较高的几率相关。
    结论:我们的研究表明,泌尿科医师对SSB-RIRS的两种激光使用相同。再干预率很低,安全概况相当,在某些情况下,单阶段双边SFR可能更好。双侧下极和大体积结石有较高的残余碎片的机会。
    OBJECTIVE: Traditionally, bilateral urolithiasis treatment involved staged interventions due to safety concerns. Recent studies have shown that same-sitting bilateral retrograde intrarenal surgery (SSB-RIRS) is effective, with acceptable complication rates. However, there\'s no clear data on the optimum laser for the procedure. This study aimed to assess outcomes of SSB-RIRS comparing thulium fiber laser (TFL) and high-power holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser in a multicenter real-world practice.
    METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted on patients undergoing SSB-RIRS from January 2015 to June 2022 across 21 centers worldwide. Three months perioperative and postoperative outcomes were recorded, focusing on complications and stone-free rates (SFR).
    RESULTS: A total of 733 patients were included, with 415 in group 1 (Ho:YAG) and 318 in group 2 (TFL). Both groups have similar demographic and stone characteristics. Group 1 had more incidence of symptomatic pain or hematuria (26.5% vs. 10.4%). Operation and lasing times were comparable. The use of baskets was higher in group 1 (47.2% vs. 18.9%, p<0.001). Postoperative complications and length of hospital stay were similar. Group 2 had a higher overall SFR. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that age, presence of stone at the lower pole, and stone diameter were associated with lower odds of being stone-free bilaterally, while TFL was associated with higher odds.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that urologists use both lasers equally for SSB-RIRS. Reintervention rates are low, safety profiles are comparable, and single-stage bilateral SFR may be better in certain cases. Bilateral lower pole and large-volume stones have higher chances of residual fragments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    激光碎石机制可惹起结石成份的化学分解和涌现分歧的终产物。然而,在胱氨酸结石的thu纤维激光(TFL)碎石术中形成的潜在毒性最终产物尚未得到充分研究。我们的体外研究的目的是分析在用TFL破碎胱氨酸结石过程中形成的气体产物的化学含量。人类肾结石由100%纯胱氨酸组成,草酸钙一水合物,或尿酸在实验设置中分别用TFL破碎,并观察气体释放。碎石术后,只有胱氨酸结石显示出气体形成。采用气相色谱-质谱联用技术对气体进行定性分析,并采用扫描电镜和能量色散X射线能谱(SEM-EDX)和X射线衍射技术对干燥的胱氨酸结石碎片进行了检查。胱氨酸结石的碎裂释放出游离的胱氨酸,硫磺,硫化氢,和二硫化碳气体。SEM-EDX和X射线衍射分析表明,干燥碎片中的游离胱氨酸含有43.1%的氧气,28.7%硫磺,16.1%氮气,和12.1%的碳原子,按原子量计算。用TFL对胱氨酸结石进行碎石后检测到潜在的有毒气体表明存在体内产生的风险。需要提高医疗保健专业人员的认识,以防止患者和手术室人员在进行胱氨酸结石的TFL碎石术期间的潜在吸入和全身毒性。
    Laser lithotripsy mechanisms can cause the chemical decomposition of stone components and the emergence of different end products. However, the potentially toxic end products formed during thulium fiber laser (TFL) lithotripsy of cystine stones have not been sufficiently investigated. The aim of our in vitro study is to analyze the chemical content of the gas products formed during the fragmentation of cystine stone with TFL. Human renal calculi consisting of 100% pure cystine, calcium oxalate monohydrate, or uric acid were fragmented separately with TFL in experimental setups and observed for gas release. After the lithotripsy, only the cystine stones showed gas formation. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was used to analyze the gas qualitatively, and scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) and X-ray diffraction was used to examine the dried cystine stone fragments. Fragmentation of the cystine stones released free cystine, sulfur, hydrogen sulfide, and carbon disulfide gas. The SEM-EDX and X-ray diffraction analyses revealed that the free cystine in the dried fragments contained 43.1% oxygen, 28.7% sulfur, 16.1% nitrogen, and 12.1% carbon atoms according to atomic weight. The detection of potentially toxic gases after lithotripsy of cystine stones with TFL indicates a risk of in vivo production. Awareness needs to be increased among healthcare professionals to prevent potential inhalation and systemic toxicity for patients and operating room personnel during TFL lithotripsy of cystine stones.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们的目的是在这里报告第一个临床系列的患者使用新型的混合thulium:钇-铝-石榴石(Tm:YAG)激光发生器(RevoLixHTL,LISA激光产品,德国),即能够以脉动波和连续波发射。
    方法:我们纳入了从2022年7月开始在单个中心接受混合Tm:YAGAEEP(hybridThuLEP)的39例连续患者,随访至手术后3个月。完整基线,术中,并收集随访人口统计学和临床数据.使用国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)问卷来量化基线和随访期间的泌尿症状。术后随访还包括PSA测试,后空隙剩余体积(PVR)测量尿流仪。Clavien-Dindo分类用于对并发症进行分类。
    结果:手术年龄和前列腺体积的中位数(IQR)分别为68(IQR63-74)岁和85(60-105)cc。根据术中和内窥镜解剖,进行整块或两叶技术摘除术。中位手术时间为85(63-108)分钟。所有病例均在术后第2天拔除膀胱导管。在两名患者中观察到需要转换为双极眼球摘除术的术中出血。放电后,1例患者出现手臂静脉炎,接受抗凝剂治疗,导致新发血尿,需要短期导管插入术(Clavien-Dindo分级II),另外2例患者出现单一急性尿潴留(Clavien-Dindo分级I).术前与术后Qmax和IPSS的中位数分别为8.0(7.0-9.4)和25.0(22.5-32.5)ml/s和22(20-28)1(0-2),而PVR从70(50-115)下降到0(0-26)ml。
    结论:HybridThuLEP是治疗良性前列腺梗阻的一种可行且有效的手术方法。
    OBJECTIVE: We aim to report here the first clinical series of patients treated with AEEP using a novel hybrid thulium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Tm:YAG) laser generator (RevoLix HTL, LISA Laser Products, Germany), i.e. capable of emitting both in pulsated and continuous-wave.
    METHODS: We included 39 consecutive patients who underwent hybrid Tm:YAG AEEP (hybrid ThuLEP) at a single center starting from July 2022 and were followed-up until 3 months after surgery. Complete baseline, intraoperative, and follow-up demographic and clinical data were collected. The International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS) questionnaire was used to quantify urinary symptoms at baseline and during follow-up. Post-operative follow-up further included a PSA test, uroflowmetry with post-void residual volume (PVR) measurement. Clavien-Dindo classification was used to classify complications.
    RESULTS: Median (IQR) age at surgery and prostate volume were 68 (IQR 63-74) years and 85 (60-105) cc. Both en-bloc or two-lobes technique enucleation were performed according to the intraoperative and endoscopic anatomy, with a median operative time of 85 (63-108) minutes. Bladder catheter was removed in all cases on postoperative day two. Intraoperative bleeding requiring conversion to bipolar enucleation was observed in two patients. After discharge, one patient developed arm phlebitis which was treated with anticoagulants leading to new onset haematuria requiring short term catheterisation (Clavien-Dindo grade II) and two more patients had a single episode of acute urinary retention (Clavien-Dindo grade I). Median pre- vs postoperative Qmax and IPSS were 8.0 (7.0-9.4) vs. 25.0 (22.5-32.5) ml/s and 22 (20-28) vs. 1 (0-2), whereas PVR decreased from 70 (50-115) to 0 (0-26) ml.
    CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid ThuLEP is a feasible and effective surgical procedure for the management of benign prostatic obstruction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较thulium激光前列腺摘除术(ThuLEP)与等离子前列腺电切术(PKRP)治疗BPH的疗效。
    方法:我们回顾性分析160例接受ThuLEP治疗的BPH患者的病历(观察组,n=80)或PKRP(对照组,n=80)于2021年1月至2023年12月在我院就诊。我们记录了手术时间,膀胱冲洗时间,导管保留时间,住院时间,术后并发症,术前和术后最大尿流率(Qmax),残余尿量(PVR),前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和前列腺体积,然后比较两组患者之间获得的数据。
    结果:与对照组相比,观察组患者手术时间明显缩短([67.25±7.24]vs[60.10±5.15]min,P<0.05),膀胱冲洗时间([46.90±10.77]vs[43.24±6.65]h,P<0.05),置管时间([5.60±1.31]vs[5.03±1.24]d,P<0.05)和住院时间([7.31±2.00]vs[6.55±1.67]d,P<0.05),更高的Qmax([18.50±1.24]vs[20.68±1.45]ml/s,P<0.05),较低的PVR([12.10±3.53]对[10.82±3.10]ml,P<0.05),PSA([4.60±0.78]vs[3.38±0.40]μg/L,P<0.05)和前列腺体积([25.35±6.46]vs[20.12±5.13]ml,P<0.05)术后3个月,但术后并发症总发生率差异无统计学意义(7.50%[6/80]vs5.00%[4/80],P>0.05)。
    结论:ThuLEP,以其效果显著的优点,手术和住院时间短,显著改善尿流动力学和前列腺功能,BPH的治疗值得临床推广。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) with plasma kinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) in the treatment of BPH.
    METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 160 cases of BPH treated by ThuLEP (the observation group, n = 80) or PKRP (the control group, n = 80) in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2023. We recorded the operation time, bladder irrigation time, catheter retention time, hospitalization time, postoperative complications, and pre- and postoperative maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), residual urine volume (PVR), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostate volume, followed by comparison of the data obtained between the two groups of patients.
    RESULTS: Compared with the controls, the patients of the observation group showed significantly shorter operation time ([67.25 ± 7.24] vs [60.10 ± 5.15] min, P< 0.05), bladder irrigation time ([46.90 ± 10.77] vs [43.24 ± 6.65] h, P< 0.05), catheterization time ([5.60 ± 1.31] vs [5.03 ± 1.24] d, P< 0.05) and hospitalization time ([7.31 ± 2.00] vs [6.55 ± 1.67] d, P< 0.05), higher Qmax ([18.50 ± 1.24] vs [20.68 ± 1.45] ml/s, P< 0.05), lower PVR ([12.10 ± 3.53] vs [10.82 ± 3.10] ml, P< 0.05), PSA ([4.60 ± 0.78] vs [3.38 ± 0.40] μg/L, P< 0.05) and prostate volume ([25.35 ± 6.46] vs [20.12 ± 5.13] ml, P< 0.05) at 3 months after surgery, but no statistically significant difference in the total incidence of postoperative complications (7.50% [6/80] vs 5.00% [4/80], P > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: ThuLEP, with its advantages of notable effect, short operation and hospitalization time, significant improvement of urinary flow dynamics and prostate function, deserves clinical promotion for the treatment of BPH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: English Abstract
    目的:探讨脉冲激光(PTL)联合曲安奈德注射治疗后尿道吻合术(FPUA)失败的临床疗效。
    方法:这项回顾性研究包括2018年1月至2023年12月在公利医院接受后尿道吻合术失败治疗的35例男性患者。所有患者均行经尿道PTL直视尿道内切开术(DVIU)(PTL组,n=15)或经尿道等离子(TUP组,n=20),所有患者均接受病灶内注射曲安奈德。我们对患者进行了中位21个月的随访,记录年龄,尿道狭窄的长度,操作时间,术前和术后最大尿流率(Qmax),术后并发症和尿道狭窄复发,并比较两组之间获得的数据。
    结果:所有患者均顺利完成治疗。年龄差异无统计学意义,尿道狭窄的长度,两组手术时间及术后并发症发生率比较(P>0.05)。thu激光组和血浆组的中位随访时间分别为21.0个月(IQR16.0-24.0)和21.0个月(IQR17.0-25.0)。分别,12个月时手术前后最大尿流率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。两组无复发生存率差异无统计学意义(P=0.398)结论:脉冲激光联合曲安奈德可有效维持尿道狭窄的短期瘢痕性稳定和满意的尿道通畅,后尿道吻合术失败后尿道狭窄的治疗方法明显优于等离子切开术。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical effect of pulsed thulium laser (PTL) combined with triamcinolone acetonide injection in the treatment of failed posterior urethral anastomosis (FPUA).
    METHODS: This retrospective study included 35 male patients treated in Gongli Hospital for failed posterior urethral anastomosis from January 2018 to December 2023. All the patients underwent direct-vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU) with transurethral PTL (the PTL group, n = 15) or transurethral plasma (the TUP group, n = 20), and all received intralesional injection of triamcinolone acetonide. We followed up the patients for a median of 21 months, recorded the age, length of urethral stricture, operation time, pre- and post-operative maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), postoperative complications and recurrence of urethral stricture, and compared the data obtained between the two groups.
    RESULTS: All the patients smoothly completed the treatment procedures. No statistically significant differences were observed in the age, length of urethral stricture, operation time and postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). The median follow-up time for the thulium laser group and plasma group was 21.0 months (IQR 16.0-24.0) and 21.0 months (IQR 17.0-25.0), respectively, with a statistically significant difference observed in the maximum urine flow rate before and after surgery at the 12-month mark (P < 0.01). No significant disparity was found in terms of relapse-free survival between the two groups (P = 0.398) Conclusion: Pulsed thulium laser combined with triamcinolone acetonide injection can effectively maintain a short-term cicatricial stability of the urethral stricture and satisfactory urethral patency, obviously superior to plasmotomy as a remedial treatment of urethral stricture after failed posterior urethral anastomosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的:在良性前列腺增生(BPH)的手术治疗中,推荐激光前列腺摘除术替代经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)和开放性前列腺切除术(OP).thulium光纤激光器,以其表面穿透深度,可以通过减少热损伤和胶囊损伤来提供快速的学习过程。这项研究比较了前60例没有指导者进行thulium纤维前列腺摘除术(ThuFLEP)的内生科医师与经验丰富的外科医生进行OP和TURP的结果。它还标识ThuFLEP的操作时间开始达到平稳的案例编号。材料和方法:在2021年11月1日至2023年11月1日之间,将没有摘除经验的口腔内科医生的最初60例ThuFLEP病例与经验丰富的外科医生进行的TURP和OP手术进行了比较。由于前60例ThuFLEP病例涉及80-120毫升前列腺,在同一时期内进行的该尺寸范围内的TURP和OP操作包括在研究中。评估这些群体的年龄,术前和术后前列腺体积,PSA水平,IPSS,IPSS生活质量(QoL),和最大尿流(Qmax)。将60例连续的ThuFLEP患者分为三组,每组20例(第1、2和3组),并比较手术时间,IPSS,和Qmax。结果:TURP的手术时间短于ThuFLEP和OP(p<0.001)。ThuFLEP和OP在术后Qmax和IPSS方面无显著差异,而TURP的值低于其他两种方法。对于ThuFLEP,前20例手术时间较长,但第2组和第3组手术时间平稳(p<0.001)。ThuFLEP三组患者术后Qmax和IPSS值差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。结论:对于大型前列腺,ThuFLEP比TURP提供更好的术后结果,并且比OP提供更短的导管插入和住院时间。与其他激光技术相比,其短的学习曲线使其成为治疗BPH的首选方法。
    Background and Objectives: In the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), laser enucleation of the prostate is recommended as an alternative to transurethral resection (TURP) and open prostatectomy (OP). The thulium fiber laser, with its superficial penetration depth, can offer a rapid learning process by causing less heat injury and capsule damage. This study compares the first 60 cases of an endourologist performing thulium fiber enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP) without a mentor to the results of OP and TURP performed by experienced surgeons. It also identifies the case number at which the operation time for ThuFLEP starts to plateau. Materials and Methods: Between 1 November 2021 and 1 November 2023, the initial 60 ThuFLEP cases of an endourologist with no prior enucleation experience were compared with TURP and OP operations performed by experienced surgeons. Since the first 60 ThuFLEP cases involved 80-120 cc prostates, TURP and OP operations within this size range performed during the same period were included in the study. The groups were assessed for age, preoperative and postoperative prostate volume, PSA levels, the IPSS, the IPSS Quality of Life (QoL), and maximum urinary flow (Qmax). The 60 consecutive ThuFLEP cases were divided into three groups of 20 (Groups 1, 2, and 3) and compared for operation time, IPSS, and Qmax. Results: The operation time for TURP was shorter than for ThuFLEP and OP (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between ThuFLEP and OP in postoperative Qmax and IPSS, while TURP had lower values than the other two methods. For ThuFLEP, the operation time was longer in the first 20 cases but plateaued in groups 2 and 3 (p < 0.001). Postoperative Qmax and IPSS values showed no significant differences among the three ThuFLEP groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: For large prostates, ThuFLEP provides better postoperative results than TURP and offers shorter catheterization and hospital stay times than OP. Its short learning curve makes it a preferable method for treating BPH compared to other laser techniques.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在体外输尿管模型上使用连续(C)和爆裂(B)激光技术评估thu纤维激光(TFL)碎石术的结石消融率和直接热损伤。
    方法:TFL驱动器(Coloplast,Humlebaek,丹麦)用于体外盐水浸没的输尿管模型。十名参与者,包括五名初级和五名有经验的泌尿科医生,使用7种不同的设置进行了实验设置,比较了两种激光技术:稳态激光(0.5J/10Hz=5W持续300s,0.5J/20Hz=10W持续150s)和脉冲串,间歇5s开/关激光(0.5J/20Hz,0.5J/30Hz,0.5J/60Hz,0.1J/200Hz,和0.05J/400Hz),使用立方125mm3幻像BegoStonesTM,目标累积能量为1500J。基于在输尿管模型的表面上观察到的烧伤和孔的严重程度,将输尿管损伤分级为1-3级。
    结果:C和B激光技术在结石消融质量方面均无显著差异,也不是在专业知识水平之间。C激光技术仅有轻度输尿管病变,专业知识水平(p:0.97)或激光设置(p:0.71)之间没有显着差异。在B激光技术下,发现了不同类型的热损伤,没有专业知识(p:0.11)或设置(p:0.83)的差异.然而,B激光设置的直接热损伤等级高于C(p:0.048)。
    结论:关于疗效,C和B激光技术实现了相当的结石消融率。安全方面,B激光模式显示直接热损伤的等级更高。应进一步研究这些结果,以验证哪种激光模式在体内最安全。在此之前,除非另有证明,建议采用低频率的C模式以避免输尿管壁病变。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the stone ablation rate and direct thermal damage from thulium fiber laser (TFL) lithotripsy using continuous (C) and burst (B) lasing techniques on an in vitro ureteral model.
    METHODS: The TFL Drive (Coloplast, Humlebaek, Denmark) was used in an in vitro saline-submerged ureteral model. Ten participants, including five junior and five experienced urologists, conducted the experimental setup with 7 different settings comparing two lasing techniques: steady-state lasing (0.5 J/10 Hz = 5W for 300 s and 0.5 J/20 Hz = 10W for 150 s) and burst, intermittent 5 s on/off lasing (0.5 J/20 Hz, 0.5 J/30 Hz, 0.5 J/60 Hz, 0.1 J/200 Hz, and 0.05 J/400 Hz) with a target cumulative energy of 1500 J using cubic 125 mm3 phantom BegoStonesTM. Ureteral damage was graded 1-3 based on the severity of burns and holes observed on the surface of the ureteral model.
    RESULTS: The were no significant differences in stone ablation mass neither between C and B lasing techniques, nor between expertise levels. At C lasing technique had only mild ureteral lesions with no significant differences between expertise levels (p: 0.97) or laser settings (p: 0.71). At B lasing technique, different types of thermal lesions were found with no expertise (p: 0.11) or setting (p: 0.83) differences. However, B laser setting had higher grade direct thermal lesions than C (p: 0.048).
    CONCLUSIONS: Regarding efficacy, C and B lasing techniques achieve comparable stone ablation rates. Safety-wise, B lasing mode showed higher grade of direct thermal lesions. These results should be further investigated to verify which of the lasing mode is the safest in vivo. Until then and unless proven otherwise, a C mode with low frequency should be recommended to avoid ureteral wall lesions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    比较thus光纤激光(TFL)和钬:钇-铝-石榴石(Ho:YAG)激光在半刚性输尿管镜下治疗输尿管结石的疗效和安全性。
    在2020年1月至2021年12月的一项前瞻性研究中,我们比较了每组40例接受半刚性输尿管镜下TFL碎石术和Ho:YAG激光碎石术的患者。石材体积,石材密度,碎石率,总激射时间,总手术时间,内窥镜视觉,分析并比较两组患者的逆行率和结石游离率。
    TFL组和Ho:YAG激光组的平均结石体积相当(282.45[标准偏差,SD139.79]mm3与279.49[标准差312.52]mm3;p=0.964)。TFL组和Ho:YAG激光组的平均结石密度也相当(1135.30[SD317.04]Hounsfield单位与1131.75[SD283.03]亨氏单位;p=0.959)。在TFL组和Ho:YAG激光组中,以结石体积除以激光时间计算的平均结石破碎率为25.85(SD10.61)mm3/min和21.37(SD14.13)mm3/min,分别(p=0.113)。平均总激射时间(10.15[SD]4.69minvs.11.43[SD4.56]min;p=0.222),平均手术时间(25.13[SD9.51]minvs.25.54[SD10.32]min;p=0.866),和平均总住院时间(2.62[SD0.77]天vs.2.61[SD0.84]天;p=0.893)在TFL组和Ho:YAG组中具有可比性。TFL组视力较好,逆行较少。TFL组术后1个月的结石清除率略好(100%vs.90%;p=0.095)。
    TFL技术与可比的总手术时间相关,总激射时间,Ho:YAG激光碎石率。然而,TFL具有更好的内窥镜视觉,较小的石头逆行,和稍微更好的无石率。
    UNASSIGNED: To compare the efficacy and safety of thulium fiber laser (TFL) and holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser for ureteric stone management with semi-rigid ureteroscopy.
    UNASSIGNED: In a prospective study from January 2020 to December 2021, we compared 40 patients in each group who underwent semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy with TFL and that with Ho:YAG laser. Stone volume, stone density, stone fragmentation rates, total lasing time, total operative time, endoscopic vision, retropulsion and stone free rates were analyzed in both groups and compared.
    UNASSIGNED: Mean stone volume was comparable in the TFL group and the Ho:YAG laser group (282.45 [standard deviation, SD 139.79] mm3 vs. 279.49 [SD 312.52] mm3; p=0.964). Mean stone density was also comparable in the TFL group and the Ho:YAG laser group (1135.30 [SD 317.04] Hounsfield unit vs. 1131.75 [SD 283.03] Hounsfield unit; p=0.959). The mean stone fragmentation rates calculated as stone volume divided by lasing time were 25.85 (SD 10.61) mm3/min and 21.37 (SD 14.13) mm3/min in the TFL group and the Ho:YAG laser group, respectively (p=0.113). The mean total lasing time (10.15 [SD] 4.69 min vs. 11.43 [SD 4.56] min; p=0.222), mean operative time (25.13 [SD 9.51] min vs. 25.54 [SD 10.32] min; p=0.866), and mean total hospital stay (2.62 [SD 0.77] days vs. 2.61 [SD 0.84] days; p=0.893) were comparable in the TFL group and in the Ho:YAG group. The vision was better and retropulsion was less in the TFL group. The stone-free rate at 1 month postoperatively was slightly better in the TFL group (100% vs. 90%; p=0.095).
    UNASSIGNED: TFL technology was associated with the comparable total surgical time, total lasing time, and stone fragmentation rate with Ho:YAG laser. However, TFL had better endoscopic vision, lesser stone retropulsion, and slightly better stone-free rates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    CO2还原光催化剂有利于获得可再生能源。富集的活性位点和有效的光生载流子分离是改善CO2光还原的关键。一种在多孔管状石墨氮化碳(g-C3N4)中引入碳空位的of(Tm)单原子定制策略,超过了以往报道的g-C3N4基光催化剂,CO产率为199.47µmolg-1h-1,96.8%CO选择性,0.84%的表观量子效率和优异的光催化稳定性,在这项工作中实现。结果表明,平面内Tm位点和层间桥接的Tm-N电荷转移通道显着增强了光生电子的聚集/转移,从而促进了CO2吸附/活化并有助于*COOH中间体的形成。同时,Tm原子和碳空位都有利于丰富的活性位点和增强的光生电荷分离,从而优化反应途径并导致优异的CO2光还原。这项工作不仅为CO2光还原催化剂设计提供了指导,而且还为太阳能燃料生产中的单原子光催化剂提供了机械见解。
    CO2 reduction photocatalysts are favorable for obtaining renewable energy. Enriched active sites and effective photogenerated-carriers separation are keys for improving CO2 photo-reduction. A thulium (Tm) single atom tailoring strategy introducing carbon vacancies in porous tubular graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) surpassing the ever-reported g-C3N4 based photocatalysts, with 199.47 µmol g-1 h-1 CO yield, 96.8% CO selectivity, 0.84% apparent quantum efficiency and excellent photocatalytic stability, is implemented in this work. Results revealed that in-plane Tm sites and interlayer-bridged Tm-N charge transfer channels significantly enhanced the aggregation/transfer of photogenerated electrons thus promoting CO2 adsorption/activation and contributing to *COOH intermediates formation. Meanwhile, Tm atoms and carbon vacancies both benefit for rich active sites and enhanced photogenerated-charge separation, thus optimizing reaction pathway and leading to excellent CO2 photo-reduction. This work not only provides guidelines for CO2 photo-reduction catalysts design but also offers mechanistic insights into single-atom based photocatalysts for solar fuel production.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号