Skin cancer prognosis has greatly improved recently due to the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, many patients with advanced skin cancer still experience immunotherapy resistance and disease progression during ICI treatment, thus calling for novel therapeutics which address this treatment gap. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) has gained popularity in recent years as a viable treatment option for patients with skin cancer. In preclinical studies, T-VEC demonstrated both a direct anti-tumor effect in injected lesions as well as a systemic immune-mediated effect in non-injected lesions, which could pose additional benefits when combined with ICI therapy. Following promising results from the OPTiM trial, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the usage of T-VEC as a single agent in advanced melanoma. However, the MASTERKEY-265 trial demonstrated that adding T-VEC to pembrolizumab did not offer additional clinical benefit in patients with melanoma. Nevertheless, the promising efficacy of T-VEC and its approval by the FDA helped oncolytic viruses (OVs) gain wide attention in cancer therapy, and extensive research has been undertaken to evaluate the usage of OVs in other tumors such as sarcomas and breast cancers. Here, we provide a review of clinical results from 2022 to 2024 that investigate the efficacy and safety of OVs as a monotherapy or in combination with other therapies in skin malignancies. Furthermore, we delineate the current limitations in OV utilization and outline future directions to enhance clinical outcomes for patients with skin malignancies receiving OV-based therapies.

UNASSIGNED: Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) pose a significant therapeutic challenge due to high recurrence rates after surgical resection and a largely ineffective response to traditional chemotherapy. An alternative treatment strategy is oncolytic viroimmunotherapy, which can elicit a durable and systemic antitumor immune response and is Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for the treatment of melanoma. Unfortunately, only a subset of patients responds completely, underscoring the need to address barriers hindering viroimmunotherapy effectiveness.
UNASSIGNED: Here we investigated the therapeutic utility of targeting key components of the MPNST immunosuppressive microenvironment to enhance viroimmunotherapy\'s antitumor efficacy in three murine models, one of which showed more immunogenic characteristics than the others.
UNASSIGNED: Myelomodulatory therapy with pexidartinib, a small molecule inhibitor of CSF1R tyrosine kinase, and the oncolytic herpes simplex virus T-VEC exhibited the most significant increase in median survival time in the highly immunogenic model. Additionally, targeting myeloid cells with the myelomodulatory therapy trabectedin, a small molecule activator of caspase-8 dependent apoptosis, augmented the survival benefit of T-VEC in a less immunogenic MPNST model. However, tumor regressions or shrinkages were not observed. Depletion experiments confirmed that the enhanced survival benefit relied on a T cell response. Furthermore, flow cytometry analysis following combination viroimmunotherapy revealed decreased M2 macrophages and myeloid-derived suppressor cells and increased tumor-specific gp70+ CD8 T cells within the tumor microenvironment.
UNASSIGNED: In summary, our findings provide compelling evidence for the potential to leverage viroimmunotherapy with myeloid cell targeting against MPNST and warrant further investigation.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1384623.].

NUT (nuclear-protein-in-testis) carcinoma (NC) is a highly aggressive tumor disease. Given that current treatment regimens offer a median survival of six months only, it is likely that this type of tumor requires an extended multimodal treatment approach to improve prognosis. In an earlier case report, we could show that an oncolytic herpes simplex virus (T-VEC) is functional in NC patients. To identify further combination partners for T-VEC, we have investigated the anti-tumoral effects of T-VEC and five different small molecule inhibitors (SMIs) alone and in combination in human NC cell lines. Dual combinations were found to result in higher rates of tumor cell reductions when compared to the respective monotherapy as demonstrated by viability assays and real-time tumor cell growth monitoring. Interestingly, we found that the combination of T-VEC with SMIs resulted in both stronger and earlier reductions in the expression of c-Myc, a main driver of NC cell proliferation, when compared to T-VEC monotherapy. These results indicate the great potential of combinatorial therapies using oncolytic viruses and SMIs to control the highly aggressive behavior of NC cancers and probably will pave the way for innovative multimodal clinical studies in the near future.

BACKGROUND: Mucosal melanoma, an aggressive type of malignancy different from the cutaneous melanomas commonly seen in the head and neck region, represents < 1% of all malignant melanomas. The pathogenesis of mucosal melanoma is unknown. Targetable mutations commonly seen in cutaneous melanoma, such as in the BRAF and NRAS genes, have a lower incidence in mucosal melanoma. Mucosal melanoma carries a distinct mutational pattern from cutaneous melanoma. Surgery with negative margins is the first-line treatment for mucosal melanoma, and systemic therapy is not well defined. Talimogene laherparepvec, an oncolytic viral immunotherapy, is United States Food and Drug Administration approved for the treatment of advanced malignant cutaneous melanoma, with local therapeutic benefits. Mucosal melanoma was initially excluded from talimogene laherparepvec\'s initial phase III clinical trial.
METHODS: We present the case of a white female patient in her 40s with past medical history of systemic lupus erythematous, scleroderma, and estrogen-receptor-positive invasive ductal breast carcinoma. Following a bilateral mastectomy, the patient was found to have BRAF-negative mucosal melanoma of her hard palate with a soft palate skip lesion. Owing to the presence of a skip mucosal lesion as well as the anticipated defect and need for free-flap reconstructive surgery, nonsurgical management was considered. The patient was referred to medical oncology, where-based on the patient\'s complicated medical history and the risk of immunotherapy possibly worsening her prior autoimmune diseases-local talimogene laherparepvec injections were chosen as the primary therapy for her mucosal lesions. Though talimogene laherparepvec is approved for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma, there are limited data available on the use of talimogene laherparepvec in mucosal melanomas.
CONCLUSIONS: The patient had a complete local tumor response at both the primary lesion as well as the skip lesion with the local injections. She had no side effects and maintained a high quality of life during treatment.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

Oncolytic virotherapy (OVT) is a promising anti-tumor modality that utilizes oncolytic viruses (OVs) to preferentially attack cancers rather than normal tissues. With the understanding particularly in the characteristics of viruses and tumor cells, numerous innovative OVs have been engineered to conquer cancers, such as Talimogene Laherparepvec (T-VEC) and tasadenoturev (DNX-2401). However, the therapeutic safety and efficacy must be further optimized and balanced to ensure the superior safe and efficient OVT in clinics, and reasonable combination therapy strategies are also important challenges worthy to be explored.
Here we provided a critical review of the development history and status of OVT, emphasizing the mechanisms of enhancing both safety and efficacy. We propose that oncolytic virotherapy has evolved into the fourth generation as tumor immunotherapy. Particularly, to arouse T cells by designing OVs expressing bi-specific T cell activator (BiTA) is a promising strategy of killing two birds with one stone. Amazing combination of therapeutic strategies of OVs and immune cells confers immense potential for managing cancers. Moreover, the attractive preclinical OVT addressed recently, and the OVT in clinical trials were systematically reviewed.
OVs, which are advancing into clinical trials, are being envisioned as the frontier clinical anti-tumor agents coming soon.

Keratinocytic cancers (KCs), specifically cutaneous squamous cell and basal cell carcinomas, can respond to topical, intralesional, or systemic immunotherapies, but cutaneous adverse events (CAEs) may occur. Understanding these risks, early recognition of these CAEs, and effective treatment may enable patients to continue their anticancer immunotherapies without dose impact. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related CAEs after KCs can have multiple clinical presentations, with specific observed types including psoriasis and bullous pemphigoid. Cutaneous toxicities can require biopsies to confirm the diagnosis, especially in patients who are not responsive to topical or oral steroids, since the selection of biologic drugs depends on accurate diagnosis. Different types of CAEs from immune checkpoint inhibitors have been associated with different oncologic outcomes in various primary cancer types, and this remains to be determined for KC patients. CAE characterization and management after immune checkpoint inhibitors in KC patients is a rapidly growing field that needs specific and prospective studies.

Mutations in the NRAS gene are common alterations in malignant melanoma. However, there are no specific treatment options approved for NRAS-mutated melanoma patients besides immune checkpoint inhibition. Since preclinical data suggests a synergistic effect of a MEK inhibitor (MEKi) and the oncolytic virus talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), we have treated three melanoma patients with this combination. All of the three patients had been suffering from recurring cutaneous and subcutaneous in-transit metastases. Upon treatment one patient (case 1) presented full regression of locoregional metastases and remained progression-free until date, for almost three years. The second patient (case 2) showed a partial regression of painful gluteal satellite metastases but died from brain metastases. The third patient (case 3) showed a durable response of locoregional metastases for seven months. The combination treatment was well tolerated with common adverse events known for each single agent. This report is the first case series presenting a clinical benefit of the combined T-VEC and MEKi treatment. We suggest the combination of T-VEC and MEKi as an off-label treatment option for patients with NRAS mutations, especially with recurrent in-transit or satellite metastases.