Sulbactam

舒巴坦
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    鲍曼不动杆菌引起的感染,特别是那些对抗生素如碳青霉烯耐药的药物,已经成为全球健康危机,死亡率很高。由鲍曼不动杆菌-钙乙酸(ABC)复合体引起的医院获得性肺炎(HAP)和呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)代表了主要的临床挑战。本次审查旨在了解审批流程,作用机制,治疗潜力,舒巴坦-杜洛巴坦治疗(SUL-DUR)的未来意义。
    PubMed,WebofScience,EMBASE,临床试验。gov,ICTRP,和CENTRAL进行了SUL-DUR治疗医院获得性肺炎和呼吸机相关性肺炎的研究。此外,世界卫生组织,美国食品和药物管理局,和疾病控制和预防中心的网站被搜索相关信息。
    SUL-DUR,作为Xacduro销售,是一种新型药物组合,可作为窄谱胃肠外给药的抗生素。舒巴坦作为β-内酰胺酶抑制剂,而durlobacactam保护免受鲍曼不动杆菌酶的降解。1期试验成功确定了SUL-DUR在正常和轻度肾功能损害患者中的安全性和耐受性。一项2期试验证明了SUL-DUR在更大的尿路感染人群中的安全性和耐受性。一项3期试验表明,SUL-DUR在鲍曼不动杆菌相关VAP的死亡率方面不劣于粘菌素,HAP,和菌血症.
    舒巴坦和durlobactam的组合是ABC复合物引起的HAP和VAP的有希望的治疗选择。
    UNASSIGNED: Infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii, particularly those resistant to antibiotics such as carbapenem, have become a global health crisis with a significant mortality rate. Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) resulting from the A. baumannii-calcoaceticus (ABC) complex represent a major clinical challenge. This review aimed to understand the approval process, mechanism of action, therapeutic potential, and future implications of sulbactam-durlobactam therapy (SUL-DUR).
    UNASSIGNED: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Clinical trials. gov, ICTRP, and CENTRAL were searched for studies on SUL-DUR for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Also, World Health Organization, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention websites were searched for relevant information.
    UNASSIGNED: SUL-DUR, marketed as Xacduro, is a novel pharmaceutical combination that functions as a narrow-spectrum parenterally administered antibiotic. Sulbactam acts as a β-lactamase inhibitor, whereas durlobactam protects against degradation by A. baumannii enzymes. A phase 1 trial successfully established the safety and tolerability of SUL-DUR in patients with normal and mild renal impairment. A phase 2 trial demonstrated the safety and tolerability of SUL-DUR in a larger population with urinary tract infections. A phase 3 trial showed that SUL-DUR was non-inferior to colistin in terms of mortality in A. baumannii-related VAP, HAP, and bacteremia.
    UNASSIGNED: The combination of sulbactam and durlobactam is a promising treatment option for HAP and VAP caused by ABC complex.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    鲍曼不动杆菌-钙乙酸复合体(ABC)感染给临床医生带来了困难,因为有效的抗菌药物库有限。舒巴坦/durlobactam为患有易感菌株的医院或呼吸机获得性肺炎的患者提供了一种新颖的治疗选择。
    这篇综述全面讨论了舒巴坦/杜洛巴坦,包括基本特征,体外活性,以及支持其用于ABC治疗的临床试验数据。制造商数据,迄今为止出版的文献,本次审查利用了会议数据。
    舒巴坦/durlobactam为临床医生提供了一种新的、有效的治疗方案。舒巴坦,当与durlobactam结合时,对ABC分离株显示出增强的效力,这已转化为临床试验和上市后案例研究中观察到的积极临床结果。尽管迄今为止的总体治疗适应症和临床经验有限,与替代药物相比,舒巴坦/durlobacactam提供了熟悉且有利的安全性。与使用联合抗生素治疗相关的因素,商业药物敏感性测试的可用性,和成本效益是目前使用舒巴坦/durlobactam的关键考虑因素。
    UNASSIGNED: Infections with Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC) pose difficulty for clinicians given a limited arsenal of effective antimicrobials. Sulbactam/durlobactam provides a novel treatment option for patients experiencing hospital- or ventilator-acquired pneumonia with susceptible strains.
    UNASSIGNED: This review provides a comprehensive discussion of sulbactam/durlobactam, including basic characteristics, in vitro activity, and clinical trial data supporting its use for the treatment of ABC. Manufacturer\'s data, published literature to date, and conference data are utilized in this review.
    UNASSIGNED: Sulbactam/durlobactam offers clinicians a new and effective treatment option for resistant ABC infection. Sulbactam, when combined with durlobactam, displays enhanced potency against ABC isolates, which has translated into positive clinical outcomes observed in clinical trials and post-marketing case studies. Although overall treatment indications and clinical experience are limited to date, sulbactam/durlobactam offers a familiar and favorable safety profile in comparison with alternative agents. Factors associated with use of combination antibiotic therapy, availability of commercial drug susceptibility testing, and cost-effectiveness are all currently key considerations for sulbactam/durlobactam use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:根据病情的严重程度,很容易为对氨苄青霉素敏感的粪肠球菌/屎菌血症规定糖肽。然而,与氨苄西林敏感的粪肠球菌/屎肠球菌菌血症相比,糖肽使用的结局数据有限.从抗生素管理的角度来看,对于氨苄西林敏感型粪肠球菌/屎肠球菌菌血症患者,确定使用糖肽是否与改善临床结局相关是重要的.
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究于2010年1月至2019年9月在一所大学附属医院进行。我们从血培养阳性的肠球菌分离株患者中收集数据。回顾了接受含氨苄西林的方案或糖肽作为氨苄西林敏感的粪肠球菌/屎肠球菌菌血症的确定性治疗的患者的临床资料。进行多因素logistic回归分析以确定28天死亡率的危险因素。
    结果:在研究期间,氨苄西林敏感的粪肠球菌/屎肠球菌占41.2%(557/1,353)。总共127例接受氨苄青霉素治疗(N=56)或糖肽治疗(N=71)的患者被纳入分析。糖肽治疗的患者28天死亡率(19.7%)高于含氨苄西林的方案(3.6%)(p=0.006)。然而,在多变量模型中,抗生素选择不是28天死亡率的独立预测因素(调整后的OR,3.7;95%CI,0.6-23.6)。
    结论:糖肽的使用与氨苄西林敏感的粪肠球菌/屎肠球菌菌血症患者死亡率的改善无关。这项研究提供了一些见解,以减少对氨苄西林敏感的粪肠球菌/屎肠球菌菌血症治疗中糖肽的不当使用,并促进抗菌药物的管理。
    BACKGROUND: Glycopeptides for ampicillin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis/faecium bacteremia are readily prescribed depending on the severity of the condition. However, there is limited data on the outcomes of glycopeptide use compared to ampicillin-containing regimens for ampicillin-susceptible E. faecalis/faecium bacteremia. From an antibiotic stewardship perspective, it is important to determine whether the use of glycopeptides is associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with ampicillin-susceptible E. faecalis/faecium bacteremia.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a university-affiliated hospital between January 2010 and September 2019. We collected data from patients with positive blood cultures for Enterococcus species isolates. The clinical data of patients who received ampicillin-containing regimens or glycopeptides as definitive therapy for ampicillin-susceptible E. faecalis/faecium bacteremia were reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for 28-day mortality.
    RESULTS: Ampicillin-susceptible E. faecalis/faecium accounted for 41.2% (557/1,353) of enterococcal bacteremia cases during the study period. A total of 127 patients who received ampicillin-containing regimens (N = 56) or glycopeptides (N = 71) as definitive therapy were included in the analysis. The 28-day mortality rate was higher in patients treated with glycopeptides (19.7%) than in those treated with ampicillin-containing regimens (3.6%) (p = 0.006). However, in the multivariate model, antibiotic choice was not an independent predictor of 28-day mortality (adjusted OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 0.6-23.6).
    CONCLUSIONS: Glycopeptide use was not associated with improved mortality in patients with ampicillin-susceptible E. faecalis/faecium bacteremia. This study provides insights to reduce the inappropriate use of glycopeptides in ampicillin-susceptible E. faecalis/faecium bacteremia treatment and promote antimicrobial stewardship.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们调查了头孢地洛/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合对具有不同头孢地洛敏感性的临床菌株的活性,以探索抗生素组合作为遏制多药耐药(MDR)病原体的主要公共卫生问题的策略的潜力。具体来说,我们评估了头孢地洛与阿维巴坦的协同活性,舒巴坦,或他唑巴坦对三种最“关键优先”的MDR细菌(耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌,铜绿假单胞菌,和鲍曼不动杆菌)。临床分离株的基因组特征为IlluminaiSeq100。用时间-杀死曲线测定进行协同作用试验。具体来说,cefiderocol/avibactam,/舒巴坦,或/他唑巴坦组合进行了分析。如果细菌生长减少达到2log10CFU/mL,则分配协同作用。我们报道了头孢地洛/舒巴坦组合对碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌的高抗菌活性,铜绿假单胞菌,和鲍曼不动杆菌;头孢地洛/阿维巴坦组合抗耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌;和头孢地洛/他唑巴坦组合抗耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌。我们的结果表明,所有β-内酰胺酶抑制剂(BLIs)测试能够增强头孢地洛抗微生物活性,还针对头孢地洛耐药的分离株。头孢地洛/舒巴坦组合成为最有前途的组合,证明在所有分析的耐碳青霉烯类革兰氏阴性分离物中高度增强头孢地洛活性,而头孢地洛/他唑巴坦组合仅对耐碳青霉烯的肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌有活性,头孢地洛/阿维巴坦仅对耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌有活性。
    We investigated the activity of cefiderocol/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against clinical strains with different susceptibility profiles to cefiderocol to explore the potentiality of antibiotic combinations as a strategy to contain the major public health problem of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens. Specifically, we evaluated the synergistic activity of cefiderocol with avibactam, sulbactam, or tazobactam on three of the most \"Critical Priority\" group of MDR bacteria (carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii). Clinical isolates were genomically characterized by Illumina iSeq 100. The synergy test was conducted with time-kill curve assays. Specifically, cefiderocol/avibactam, /sulbactam, or /tazobactam combinations were analyzed. Synergism was assigned if bacterial grow reduction reached 2 log10 CFU/mL. We reported the high antimicrobial activity of the cefiderocol/sulbactam combination against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii; of the cefiderocol/avibactam combination against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales; and of the cefiderocol/tazobactam combination against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. Our results demonstrate that all β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) tested are able to enhance cefiderocol antimicrobial activity, also against cefiderocol-resistant isolates. The cefiderocol/sulbactam combination emerges as the most promising combination, proving to highly enhance cefiderocol activity in all the analyzed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative isolates, whereas the Cefiderocol/tazobactam combination resulted in being active only against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa, and cefiderocol/avibactam was only active against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    头孢地洛,一种铁载体-头孢菌素结合抗生素,显示有望作为耐碳青霉烯(CR)不动杆菌感染的治疗选择。虽然鲍曼不动杆菌已经有耐药性的报道,与阿维巴坦或舒巴坦联合治疗可降低头孢地洛的MIC,扩展其功效。然而,使用这些组合时,需要仔细考虑。在我们的实验中,鲍曼不动杆菌和A.lwoffii暴露于头孢地洛和舒巴坦或阿维巴坦导致选择头孢地洛耐药菌株。其中三个进行了全基因组测序和转录组学分析。菌株均具有同义和非同义取代和短缺失。最重要的突变影响外排泵,转录调节因子,和铁稳态基因。转录组学显示外膜蛋白表达水平显著改变,铁稳态,和β-内酰胺酶,提示对选择性压力的适应性反应。这项研究强调了仔细评估药物协同作用的重要性,因为它们可能无意中促进了耐药变体的选择,并使CR不动杆菌感染的管理复杂化。重要意义碳青霉烯类耐药不动杆菌菌株作为严重的全球健康威胁的出现强调了对有效治疗方案的迫切需要。尽管很少有药物显示出对CR不动杆菌感染的希望,已经报道了对这两种药物的耐药性。在这项研究中,自发头孢地洛抗性变体的分子表征,对舒巴坦具有拮抗作用的CR鲍曼不动杆菌菌株,和一种对维巴坦有拮抗作用的Lwoffii菌株,提供了对头孢地洛抗性机制的有价值的见解。观察到的一些机制与影响外排泵的突变有关,监管者,和铁稳态基因。这些发现强调了理解抗性机制以优化治疗方案的重要性。他们还强调了早期评估药物协同作用以应对不动杆菌感染中抗生素耐药性挑战的重要性。
    Cefiderocol, a siderophore-cephalosporine conjugate antibiotic, shows promise as a therapeutic option for carbapenem-resistant (CR) Acinetobacter infections. While resistance has already been reported in A. baumannii, combination therapies with avibactam or sulbactam reduce MICs of cefiderocol, extending its efficacy. However, careful consideration is necessary when using these combinations. In our experiments, exposure of A. baumannii and A. lwoffii to cefiderocol and sulbactam or avibactam led to the selection of cefiderocol-resistant strains. Three of those were subjected to whole genome sequencing and transcriptomic analysis. The strains all possessed synonymous and non-synonymous substitutions and short deletions. The most significant mutations affected efflux pumps, transcriptional regulators, and iron homeostasis genes. Transcriptomics showed significant alterations in expression levels of outer membrane proteins, iron homeostasis, and β-lactamases, suggesting adaptive responses to selective pressure. This study underscores the importance of carefully assessing drug synergies, as they may inadvertently foster the selection of resistant variants and complicate the management of CR Acinetobacter infections.IMPORTANCEThe emergence of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter strains as a serious global health threat underscores the urgent need for effective treatment options. Although few drugs show promise against CR Acinetobacter infections, resistance to both drugs has been reported. In this study, the molecular characterization of spontaneous cefiderocol-resistant variants, a CR A. baumannii strain with antagonism to sulbactam, and an A. lwoffii strain with antagonism to avibactam, provides valuable insights into the mechanisms of resistance to cefiderocol. Some mechanisms observed are associated with mutations affecting efflux pumps, regulators, and iron homeostasis genes. These findings highlight the importance of understanding resistance mechanisms to optimize treatment options. They also emphasize the importance of early evaluation of drug synergies to address the challenges of antimicrobial resistance in Acinetobacter infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:舒巴坦(SBT)是广泛耐药鲍曼不动杆菌(XDR-AB)患者最重要的治疗方法之一。然而,SBT及其高剂量方案的有效性和安全性尚未得到充分证明.这项回顾性研究旨在评估基于SBT的治疗的有效性和安全性。特别是在高剂量(≥6克/天),XDR-AB感染。
    方法:纳入北京协和医院接受静脉SBT治疗的52例XDR-AB感染患者。主要结果是28天全因死亡率,而次要结局是14天临床缓解和缓解时间.在我们的研究中,SBT的配方为每瓶0.5g。
    结果:在患者中,28天全因死亡率为36.5%(19/52),良好的14天临床缓解率为59.6%(31/52)。28天死亡率与革兰氏阳性菌(GPB)合并感染和较短的治疗持续时间独立相关。颅内感染患者的生存时间可能更长。良好的14天临床反应与SBT剂量相关,和更长的治疗时间。然而,较高的肌酐清除率(CrCl)与较差的临床反应相关。此外,较高的SBT剂量与较短的临床缓解时间显著相关.无相关不良反应报告。
    结论:SBT的单药制剂成为治疗XDR-AB感染的有希望的替代药物,例如颅内感染,特别是在高剂量(≥6克/天)。此外,更长的治疗时间与更高的生存率和更好的临床反应相关。较高的CrCl与良好的临床反应负相关。
    OBJECTIVE: Sulbactam (SBT) is one of the most significant treatments for patients with extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (XDR-AB). However, the efficacy and safety of SBT and its high dose regimen has not been well documented. This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of SBT-based treatment, particularly at high-dose (≥ 6 g/day), for XDR-AB infection.
    METHODS: A total of 52 XDR-AB infected patients treated with intravenous SBT at Peking Union Medical College Hospital were included. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality, while the secondary outcome was 14-day clinical response and the time of response. The formulation of SBT in our study is 0.5 g per vial.
    RESULTS: Among the patients, the 28-day all-cause mortality rate was 36.5% (19/52), and the favorable 14-day clinical response rate was 59.6% (31/52). The 28-day mortality was independently associated coinfection with gram-positive bacteria (GPB) and a shorter duration of therapy. Patients with intracranial infection might have a longer survival time. A favorable 14-day clinical response was associated with the dose of SBT, and a longer treatment duration. However, the higher creatinine clearance (CrCl) associated with a worse clincal response. In addition, a higher SBT dosage was significantly correlated with a shorter time to clinical response. No adverse effects related were reported.
    CONCLUSIONS: The single-agent formulation of SBT emerges as a promising alternative for the treatment of XDR-AB infection, such as intracranial infection, particularly at high doses (≥ 6 g/day). Besides, longer duration of treatment correlates with higher survival rate and better favorable clinical response. Higher CrCl negatively correlates with favorable clinical response.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于可用的药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)数据有限,鲍曼不动杆菌感染的舒巴坦给药剂量尚未标准化。在这里,我们报道了氨苄西林-舒巴坦对鲍曼不动杆菌肺炎的全面PK/PD分析。
    方法:在中性粒细胞减少的鼠肺炎模型中测试了21株鲍曼不动杆菌临床分离株。对于剂量范围研究,各组小鼠给予递增剂量的氨苄西林-舒巴坦。评估log10cfu/肺相对于0h的变化。进行剂量分级研究。计算未结合的血浆舒巴坦浓度超过不同功效终点所需的MIC(%fT>MIC)的时间百分比的估计。在临床使用舒巴坦方案后,估计了1-log杀死血浆靶标的靶标达到(PTA)的概率。
    结果:剂量分级研究证明了时间依赖性杀伤。对舒巴坦和美罗培南均具有抗性的分离株需要三倍的暴露才能达到1-log的杀死;与其他表型(21.17[16.0-32.9]%fT>MIC)相比,中位数[IQR]%fT>MIC为60.37%[51.6-66.8]。舒巴坦标准剂量(1克q6h,0.5h输注)提供>90%PTA,达到4mg/L的MIC。舒巴坦3克q8h,4hinf为具有舒巴坦-中间敏感性的分离株提供了更高的PTA(8mg/L,100%对86%的标准剂量)。尽管3gq8h后暴露量较高,4hinf,在舒巴坦耐药/美罗培南耐药菌株中,PTA≤57%。
    结论:舒巴坦标准剂量是对舒巴坦敏感分离株有价值的治疗方案,而高剂量延长输注对舒巴坦中间分离株有额外的益处。鉴于大多数舒巴坦耐药鲍曼不动杆菌分离株对美罗培南耐药,预计大剂量延长输注方案作为单药治疗对这些分离株引起的感染无效.
    BACKGROUND: Sulbactam dosing for Acinetobacter baumannii infections has not been standardized due to limited available pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) data. Herein, we report a comprehensive PK/PD analysis of ampicillin-sulbactam against A. baumannii pneumonia.
    METHODS: Twenty-one A. baumannii clinical isolates were tested in the neutropenic murine pneumonia model. For dose-ranging studies, groups of mice were administered escalating doses of ampicillin-sulbactam. Changes in log10cfu/lungs relative to 0 h were assessed. Dose-fractionation studies were performed. Estimates of the percentage of of time during which the unbound plasma sulbactam concentrations exceeded the MIC (%fT > MIC) required for different efficacy endpoints were calculated. The probabilities of target attainment (PTA) for the 1-log kill plasma targets were estimated following clinically utilized sulbactam regimens.
    RESULTS: Dose-fractionation studies demonstrated time-dependent kill. Isolates resistant to both sulbactam and meropenem required three times the exposures to achieve 1-log kill; median [IQR] %fT > MIC of 60.37% [51.6-66.8] compared with other phenotypes (21.17 [16.0-32.9] %fT > MIC). Sulbactam standard dose (1 g q6h, 0.5 h infusion) provided >90% PTA up to MIC of 4 mg/L. Sulbactam 3 g q8h, 4 h inf provided greater PTA for isolates with sulbactam-intermediate susceptibility (8 mg/L, 100% versus 86% following the standard dose). Despite the higher exposure following 3 g q8h, 4 h inf, PTA was ≤57% among sulbactam-resistant/meropenem-resistant isolates.
    CONCLUSIONS: Sulbactam standard dose is a valuable regimen across sulbactam-susceptible isolates while the high-dose extended-infusion provides additional benefit against sulbactam-intermediate isolates. Given that most of the sulbactam-resistant A. baumannii isolates are meropenem-resistant, high-dose prolonged-infusion regimens are not expected to be effective as monotherapy against infections due to these isolates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌(CRAB)是一种优先级1(关键)病原体,迫切需要新的抗生素。多粘菌素是对抗CRAB相关感染的最后一线选择。这项转录组学研究利用CRAB菌株来研究多粘菌素B杀死细菌的机制,粘菌素,粘菌素B,粘菌素/舒巴坦联合治疗。2mg/L多粘菌素单药治疗4小时后,所有多粘菌素都表现出共同的转录组反应,主要涉及氨基酸和脂肪酸代谢的破坏。在三种单一疗法中,多粘菌素B诱导最大数量的差异表达基因(DEGs),包括与脂肪酸代谢有关的基因。粘菌素和粘菌素B的基因紊乱高度相似(粘菌素B的常见基因为89%),尽管粘菌素对基因表达的影响通常较低(在大多数情况下为0-1.5倍)。单独使用粘菌素(2mg/L)或与舒巴坦(64mg/L)联合使用可导致早于1小时的快速膜破坏。这种组合的转录组学分析显示,这种作用是由粘菌素驱动的,其中包括脂肪酸合成和分解代谢的紊乱,和抑制营养吸收。联合治疗在72%的DEG中产生了明显更高的倍数变化,导致脂肪酸生物合成的大幅减少和生物膜的增加,细胞壁,和磷脂合成。这表明粘菌素/舒巴坦组合的协同细菌杀死是由于与细菌代谢相关的许多基因的扰动的系统性增加。这些机制的见解增强了我们对多粘菌素单一和联合治疗的细菌反应的理解,并将有助于优化患者多粘菌素的使用。
    Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is a Priority 1 (Critical) pathogen urgently requiring new antibiotics. Polymyxins are a last-line option against CRAB-associated infections. This transcriptomic study utilized a CRAB strain to investigate mechanisms of bacterial killing with polymyxin B, colistin, colistin B, and colistin/sulbactam combination therapy. After 4 h of 2 mg/L polymyxin monotherapy, all polymyxins exhibited common transcriptomic responses which primarily involved disruption to amino acid and fatty acid metabolism. Of the three monotherapies, polymyxin B induced the greatest number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), including for genes involved with fatty acid metabolism. Gene disturbances with colistin and colistin B were highly similar (89 % common genes for colistin B), though effects on gene expression were generally lower (0-1.5-fold in most cases) with colistin B. Colistin alone (2 mg/L) or combined with sulbactam (64 mg/L) resulted in rapid membrane disruption as early as 1 h. Transcriptomic analysis of this combination revealed that the effects were driven by colistin, which included disturbances in fatty acid synthesis and catabolism, and inhibition of nutrient uptake. Combination therapy produced substantially higher fold changes in 72 % of DEGs shared with monotherapy, leading to substantially greater reductions in fatty acid biosynthesis and increases in biofilm, cell wall, and phospholipid synthesis. This indicates synergistic bacterial killing with the colistin/sulbactam combination results from a systematic increase in perturbation of many genes associated with bacterial metabolism. These mechanistic insights enhance our understanding of bacterial responses to polymyxin mono- and combination therapy and will assist to optimize polymyxin use in patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:使用头孢哌酮/舒巴坦(CPZ/SAM)通常可引起维生素K依赖性凝血功能紊乱,有时甚至出血。然而,缺乏估计风险的预测工具。本研究旨在开发和内部验证预测中国住院患者CPZ/SAM相关凝血障碍的模型。
    方法:对2020年至2021年在中国综合医院接受CPZ/SAM治疗的11,092例成人住院患者进行了病例对照研究。通过药物不良事件主动监测和评估系统-II和随后的手动评估来鉴定患有CPZ/SAM相关凝血障碍的患者。对照组选自CPZ/SAM治疗后未出现凝血功能紊乱的合格患者,1:1的倾向得分匹配。通过单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析获得最终预测因子。使用1000次自举重新采样进行模型的内部验证和校准。
    结果:在符合纳入和排除的2184例患者中,258例患者被确定为CPZ/SAM相关凝血障碍,发生率为11.8%。最终包括252个病例和252个对照的群体用于模型开发和验证。营养不良(OR=2.41(1.56-3.77)),近期出血病史(OR=1.95(1.32-2.90)),治疗持续时间(OR=1.10(1.07-1.14)),与碳青霉烯类抗生素组合(OR=4.43(1.85-11.88)),和血清肌酐(OR=1.01(1.00-1.01))被确定为最终预测因子。该模型显示出良好的鉴别力,校准,和临床实用性,接收器工作特性曲线下的验证面积为0.723(0.683-0.770)。
    结论:性能良好的模型量化了CPZ/SAM相关凝血障碍的风险,并可能支持个人评估和干预措施,以减轻外部验证后的风险。
    OBJECTIVE: The use of cefoperazone/sulbactam (CPZ/SAM) could commonly cause vitamin K-dependent coagulation disorders and even hemorrhage sometimes. However, there is a lack of prediction tools estimating the risk for this. This study aimed at developing and internally validating a model for predicting CPZ/SAM-associated coagulation disorders in Chinese inpatients.
    METHODS: A case-control study was conducted in 11,092 adult inpatients admitted to a Chinese general hospital between 2020 and 2021 and treated with CPZ/SAM. Patients with CPZ/SAM-associated coagulation disorders were identified through the Adverse Drug Events Active Surveillance and Assessment System-II and subsequent manual evaluation. Controls were selected from eligible patients who didn\'t develop coagulation disorders after CPZ/SAM therapy, with a 1:1 propensity score matching. The final predictors were obtained by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Internal validation and calibration for the model were performed using 1000 bootstrap resamplings.
    RESULTS: 258 patients were identified as CPZ/SAM-associated coagulation disorders in 2184 patients eligible for inclusions and exclusions and the incidence was 11.8%. A final population of 252 cases and 252 controls was included for model development and validation. Malnutrition (OR = 2.41 (1.56-3.77)), history of recent bleeding (OR = 1.95 (1.32-2.90)), treatment duration (OR = 1.10 (1.07-1.14)), combination with carbapenems (OR = 4.43 (1.85-11.88)), and serum creatinine (OR = 1.01 (1.00-1.01)) were identified as final predictors. The model showed good discrimination, calibration, and clinical practicality, with the validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve being 0.723 (0.683-0.770).
    CONCLUSIONS: The model with good performance quantifies the risk for CPZ/SAM-associated coagulation disorders, and may support individual assessment and interventions to mitigate the risk after external validation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们评估了两种临床使用的舒巴坦方案的模拟人方案(HSR)的疗效:1gq6h0.5h输注(FDA批准的最大剂量)和3gq8h4h输注(高剂量,延长输注方案),在转化鼠模型中对抗鲍曼不动杆菌。
    方法:对32株临床鲍曼不动杆菌进行研究,其中16例为舒巴坦耐药(MIC≥16mg/L),6为舒巴坦中间体(MIC=8mg/L),10为舒巴坦敏感(MIC≤4mg/L)。在中性粒细胞减少的鼠肺炎模型中评估了两种舒巴坦HSR的功效。与0h对照组相比,24h时log10cfu/肺的变化被测量,功效定义为相对于基线达到1个对数杀伤。进行分离物的WGS和生物信息学分析以探索基因组背景和体内反应之间的潜在关联。
    结果:11株分离株携带blaOXA-23,其中10株对舒巴坦耐药,1为中间的舒巴坦,而没有敏感的舒巴坦。两种舒巴坦HSR对舒巴坦敏感的分离株均达到>1个对数的杀伤。针对舒巴坦-中间和舒巴坦-抗性分离株,缺乏与blaOXA-23基因的存在相关的功效;舒巴坦1gHSR和3gHSR未显示对11/11和9/11blaOXA-23阳性分离株的功效,分别,而对所有11株blaOXA-23阴性舒巴坦中间株和舒巴坦耐药株(即携带其他耐药基因)均有疗效。
    结论:舒巴坦高剂量延长输注方案对目前认为舒巴坦敏感的分离株具有与标准剂量相当的活性。然而,通过检测blaOXA-23可以预测对具有中等和抗性敏感性的分离株的活性。增强包括OXA-23的常见诊断方式的检测能力可以改善患者结果。
    OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the efficacies of human-simulated regimens (HSRs) of two clinically utilized sulbactam regimens: 1 g q6h 0.5 h infusion (maximum FDA-approved dosage) and 3 g q8h 4 h infusion (high-dose, prolonged-infusion regimen), against Acinetobacter baumannii in a translational murine model.
    METHODS: Thirty-two clinical A. baumannii isolates were investigated, of which 16 were sulbactam resistant (MIC ≥ 16 mg/L), 6 were sulbactam intermediate (MIC = 8 mg/L) and 10 were sulbactam susceptible (MIC ≤ 4 mg/L). Efficacies of the two sulbactam HSRs were assessed in the neutropenic murine pneumonia model. Changes in log10 cfu/lungs at 24 h compared with 0 h controls were measured, and efficacy was defined as achieving 1 log kill relative to baseline. WGS of the isolates and bioinformatics analysis were performed to explore potential associations between the genomic backgrounds and the in vivo responses.
    RESULTS: Eleven isolates harboured blaOXA-23, of which 10 were sulbactam resistant, 1 was sulbactam intermediate while none was sulbactam susceptible. Both sulbactam HSRs achieved >1 log kill against sulbactam-susceptible isolates. Against sulbactam-intermediate and sulbactam-resistant isolates, lack of efficacy correlated with the presence of the blaOXA-23 gene; sulbactam 1 g HSR and 3 g HSR did not show efficacy against 11/11 and 9/11 blaOXA-23-positive isolates, respectively, while efficacy was observed against all 11 blaOXA-23-negative sulbactam-intermediate and sulbactam-resistant isolates (i.e. harbouring other resistance genes).
    CONCLUSIONS: A sulbactam high-dose prolonged-infusion regimen provides comparable activity to the standard dose against isolates currently considered sulbactam susceptible. However, the activity against isolates with intermediate and resistant susceptibility could be predicted by the detection of blaOXA-23. Enhancing detection capabilities of common diagnostic modalities to include OXA-23 can improve patient outcome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号