BACKGROUND: We evaluated internet platforms for distributing HIV self-tests (HIVSTs) to Black or African American (Black) and Hispanic or Latino men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW).
METHODS: We recruited MSM and TGW from general interest, dating, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender platforms. Two HIVSTs were mailed to all MSM and TGW. Surveys (screening, baseline, 4-month, and results reporting) were completed online. After 4 months, participants were mailed another HIVST and a dried blood spot card. All HIVST interpretations and images of HIVST devices were reported online.
RESULTS: Of 2093 MSM and 102 TGW, most were recruited through general interest and dating platforms. Over 50% were 18-29 years old, most identified as gay or bisexual. Overall, 45% had not tested for HIV in the past 12 months, and 9.1% of MSM reported a positive (reactive for HIV antibodies) HIVST result, with the highest percentage among Black MSM (11.5%). Dating platforms recruited higher percentages of MSM who recorded positive results compared with MSM from general interest platforms during the intervention period (11.9% vs 5.5% (P < 0.0001)), and MSM who had never tested for HIV reported a greater percentage of positive HIVST results compared with MSM who had been tested for HIV before enrollment (16.1% vs. 7.1%; P < 0.0001). MSM were able to correctly interpret and report HIVST results. Of TGW, 7% reported a positive HIVST result.
CONCLUSIONS: Internet dating and general interest platforms can be key to increasing awareness of infection among BMSM, HMSM, and TGW persons, including those who do not use existing HIV services.
BACKGROUND: www.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04219878.

BACKGROUND: Peer-delivered HIV self-testing (HIVST) and sexually transmitted infection self-sampling (STISS) may promote adherence to oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), but no studies have analyzed this approach among transgender women (TGW) in sub-Saharan Africa.
METHODS: The Peer study was a cluster randomized trial in Uganda (October 2020-July 2022; NCT04328025).
METHODS: Ten TGW peer groups, each with 1 TGW peer and 8 TGW, were randomized 1:1 to receive quarterly in-clinic HIV testing with PrEP refills as standard-of-care (SOC) or SOC plus monthly peer delivery of oral-fluid HIVST, STISS, and PrEP refills (intervention). Participants were followed for 12 months. The primary outcome was PrEP adherence.
RESULTS: We screened 85 TGW and enrolled 82 (41 per arm). The median age was 22 years (interquartile range [IQR] 20-24). Twelve-month retention was 88% (72/82). At the 3, 6, 9, and 12-month clinic visits, 10%, 5%, 5%, and 0% of TGW in the intervention arm had TFV-DP levels ≥700 fmol/punch, versus 7%, 15%, 7%, and 2% in the SOC arm, respectively (P = 0.18). At all visits, any detectable TFV-DP levels were significantly higher in SOC than the peer delivery group (P < 0.04). PrEP adherence was associated with sex work (incidence rate ratio 6.93; 95% CI: 2.33 to 20.60) and >10 years of schooling (incidence rate ratio 2.35; 95% CI: 1.14 to 4.84). There was a strong correlation between tenofovir detection in dried blood spots and urine (P < 0.001). No HIV seroconversions occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Peer-delivered HIVST and STISS did not increase low levels of oral PrEP adherence among TGW in Uganda. Long-acting PrEP formulations should be considered for this population.

BACKGROUND: HIV self-testing (HIVST) offers an innovative and promising approach to increasing HIV testing among Black men in the United States, a population disproportionately affected by HIV. However, engaging Black men in traditional HIV prevention programs has been challenging due to stigma, medical mistrust, and limited access to preventive health services. This formative qualitative study aimed to explore the potential of utilizing barbershops as an example of a nontraditional healthcare venue to promote and distribute HIVST.
METHODS: Four virtual focus group discussions (FGDs) consisting of 19 participants in North Carolina were conducted with Black men, including barbershop business owners, barbers, and their customers, to assess perceptions of HIVST and the acceptability of partnering with barbershop businesses to promote HIVST. FGDs were digitally recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a deductive coding approach to thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Participants reported that the trusting relationship between barbers and their customers, which may not exist between Black men and health care providers, is a facilitator of collaborating with barbershop businesses to reach Black men for HIVST distribution. Participants recommended providing education for barbers on the use of HIVST, as well as how to inform self-testers about linkage to care following HIVST to build the credibility of the barbers in delivering the intervention. Participants also raised the issue of the cost of HIVST to barbershop customers as a potential barrier to implementation, as well as the possibility that the implementation of such interventions could be seen as out of place in a barbershop business venue. Participants also expressed a strong belief that compensation to barbershops and their employees should accompany any intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that barbershop business venues may provide an appropriate venue for HIVST promotion and distribution, though factors like cost, training, and incentivization of implementers are necessary to consider in implementation planning. Furthermore, partnerships between public health actors and the business community must be built on equitable engagement to ensure the long-term viability of these critical initiatives.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men living with HIV (GBMSM-LWH) in the United States bear a heavy burden of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Timely diagnosis and treatment are key to prevention. Only a few studies have combined home specimen self-collection for bacterial STI screening with live audio and video (AV) conferencing. None have focused on GBMSM-LWH or incorporated motivational interviewing (MI), a client-centered, strengths-based counseling approach that seeks to support individuals to create positive behavioral change.
OBJECTIVE: Our study seeks to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of an MI-based telehealth intervention that integrates home specimen self-collection from different anatomical sites of possible exposure and MI delivered via live AV conferencing to engage sexually active GBMSM-LWH in bacterial STI screening.
METHODS: Participants are being recruited from across the United States via advertising on mobile dating apps and social networking sites and via peer referral. Phase 1 involves piloting the delivery of an innovative telehealth intervention for bacterial STI screening to 75 GBMSM-LWH. Our intervention includes three components: (1) a pretest live AV conferencing session involving an MI-guided discussion to elicit awareness of bacterial STIs; fill any knowledge gaps; bolster the perceived importance of regularly testing for gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis; and build self-efficacy for specimen self-collection; (2) home self-collection and return via mail of a urine sample (for gonorrhea and chlamydia testing), a throat swab (for gonorrhea and chlamydia testing), a rectal swab (for gonorrhea and chlamydia testing), and a finger-stick blood sample (for syphilis testing); and (3) a posttest live AV conferencing session involving an MI-guided discussion to prepare participants for receiving test results and formulate personalized action plans for seeking treatment (if warranted) and repeat testing. Descriptive statistics and progression ratios will be calculated, and potential variations in our intervention\'s feasibility and acceptability will be numerically summarized and graphically visualized. Phase 2 involves elucidating attitudes, facilitators, and barriers related to engaging in each intervention component via semistructured in-depth interviews with a purposive subsample of 20 participants who complete progressively smaller subsets of the pretest session, specimen return for bacterial STI testing, and the posttest session. Thematic analysis will be used to identify, analyze, and report patterns in the data. Quantitative and qualitative data will be integrated at the design, methods, interpretation, and reporting levels.
RESULTS: Study procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Michigan in September 2023. Participant recruitment began in April 2024.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study will advance multiple goals of the STI National Strategic Plan for the United States for 2021 to 2025, specifically those pertaining to preventing new STIs; accelerating progress in STI research, technology, and innovation; and reducing STI-related health disparities.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06100250; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06100250.
UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/64433.

OBJECTIVE: To review HIV testing services (HTS) costs in sub-Saharan Africa.
METHODS: A systematic literature review of studies published from January 2006 to October 2020.
METHODS: We searched ten electronic databases for studies that reported estimates for cost per person tested ($pptested) and cost per HIV-positive person identified ($ppositive) in sub-Saharan Africa. We explored variations in incremental cost estimates by testing modality (health facility-based, home-based, mobile-service, self-testing, campaign-style, and stand-alone), by primary or secondary/index HTS, and by population (general population, people living with HIV, antenatal care male partner, antenatal care/postnatal women and key populations). All costs are presented in 2019US$.
RESULTS: Sixty-five studies reported 167 cost estimates. Most reported only $pptested (90%), while (10%) reported the $ppositive. Costs were highly skewed. The lowest mean $pptested was self-testing at $12.75 (median = $11.50); primary testing at $16.63 (median = $10.68); in the general population, $14.06 (median = $10.13). The highest costs were in campaign-style at $27.64 (median = $26.70), secondary/index testing at $27.52 (median = $15.85), and antenatal male partner at $47.94 (median = $55.19). Incremental $ppositive was lowest for home-based at $297.09 (median = $246.75); primary testing $352.31 (median = $157.03); in the general population, $262.89 (median: $140.13).
CONCLUSIONS: While many studies reported the incremental costs of different HIV testing modalities, few presented full costs. Although the $pptested estimates varied widely, the costs for stand-alone, health facility, home-based, and mobile services were comparable, while substantially higher for campaign-style HTS and the lowest for HIV self-testing. Our review informs policymakers of the affordability of various HTS to ensure universal access to HIV testing.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization has recommended a new method for HIV self-testing (HIVST) using oral fluid, intending to increase HIV testing rates, and linking individuals to medical care. Healthcare workers are chief health advocates in the community who need adequate knowledge and intention to use the newly recommended HIVST approach. However, studies on awareness and the intention to use oral fluid for HIV self-testing among Ethiopian healthcare workers are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to assess healthcare workers\' knowledge of and intentions to use oral fluid for HIV self-testing in Hadiya Zone public hospitals in southern Ethiopia in 2022.
METHODS: We conducted a facility-based cross-sectional study among a sample of 352 healthcare workers from 1 to 30 June 2022. The data were entered into Epidata version 4.2 and exported to SPSS version 23 for analysis. We used a logistic regression model with a 95% confidence interval for the interpretation of adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with P < 0.05.
RESULTS: Of the total participants, 40.3% had good knowledge, and 63.1% intended to use oral fluid (HIVST). Approximately 92% of healthcare workers had not received training, and 48.3% had heard about HIVST. Only 12.3% knew about the availability of the kit in hospitals, and 19.9% had ever used HIVST. Being male (AOR = 2.28; 95% CI 1.33-3.95), receiving support for the implementation of HIVST (AOR = 2.07; 95% CI 1.21-3.56), hearing about HIVST (AOR = 5.05; 95% CI 2.89-8.81), having prior experience using HIVST (AOR = 2.94; 95% CI 1.71-5.05), having a spouse or partner (AOR = 2.78; 95% CI 1.14-6.82), and having multiple sexual partners (AOR = 2.76; 95% CI 1.13-6.78) were associated with good knowledge of oral HIVST. Being aged 25-29 years (AOR = 2.54; 95% CI 1.18, 5.41), perceiving the high cost of the HIVST kit (AOR = 0.37; 95% CI 0.16-0.84), and having poor knowledge (AOR = 1.91; 95% CI 1.13-3.23) were significantly associated with the intention to use the oral fluid for HIVST.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need for technical updating training for healthcare workers to increase their knowledge of and intention to use oral fluid for HIVST. Promoting oral fluid HIVST through targeted education, supporting initiatives, and addressing cost concerns related to the testing kit may increase the uptake of oral fluid HIVST among healthcare workers.

HIV self-testing (HIVST) has the potential to reduce barriers associated with clinic-based preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) delivery. We conducted a substudy nested in a prospective, pilot implementation study evaluating patient-centered differentiated care services. Clients chose either a blood-based or oral fluid HIVST kit at the first refill visit. Data were abstracted from program files and surveys were administered to clients. We purposively sampled a subset of PrEP clients and their providers to participate in in-depth interviews. We surveyed (n = 285). A majority (269/285, 94%) reported HIV risk. Blood-based HIVST was perceived as easy to use (76/140, 54%), and (41/140, 29%) perceived it to be more accurate. Oral fluid-based HIVST was perceived to be easy to use (95/107, 89%), but almost all (106/107, 99%) perceived it as less accurate. HIVST improved privacy, reduced workload, and saved time. HIVST demonstrates the potential to streamline facility-based PrEP care in busy African public health facilities.

BACKGROUND: Chlamydia remains prevalent worldwide and is considered a global public health problem. However, testing rates among young sexually active people remain low. Effective clinical management relies on screening asymptomatic patients. However, attending face-to-face consultations of testing for sexually transmitted infections is associated with stigmatization and anxiety. Self-testing technology (STT) allows patients to test themselves for chlamydia and gonorrhea without the presence of health care professionals. This may result in wider access to testing and increase testing uptake. Therefore, the sexual health clinic at Odense University Hospital has designed and developed a technology that allows patients to get tested at the clinic through self-collected sampling without a face-to-face consultation.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) pilot-test STT used in clinical practice and (2) investigate the experiences of patients who have completed a self-test for chlamydia and gonorrhea.
METHODS: The study was conducted as a qualitative study inspired by the methodology of participatory design. Ethnographic methods were applied in the feasibility study and the data analyzed were inspired by the action research spiral in iterative processes using steps, such as plan, act, observe, and reflect. The qualitative evaluation study used semistructured interviews and data were analyzed using a qualitative 3-level analytical model.
RESULTS: The findings from the feasibility study, such as lack of signposting and adequate information, led to the final modifications of the self-test technology and made it possible to implement it in clinical practice. The qualitative evaluation study found that self-testing was seen as more appealing than testing at a face-to-face consultation because it was an easy solution that both saved time and allowed for the freedom to plan the visit independently. Security was experienced when the instructions balanced between being detail-oriented while also being simple and illustrative. The anonymity and discretion contributed to preserving privacy and removed the fear of an awkward conversation or being judged by health care professionals thus leading to the reduction of intrusive feelings.
CONCLUSIONS: Accessible health care services are crucial in preventing and reducing the impact of sexually transmitted infections and STT may have the potential to increase testing uptake as it takes into account some of the barriers that exist. The pilot test and evaluation have resulted in a fully functioning implementation of STT in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Primary Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) testing offers higher sensitivity and specificity over Visual Inspection using Acetic acid (VIA) in cervical cancer screening. Self-sampling is a promising strategy to boost participation and reduce disparities. However, concerns about the initial costs hinder HPV testing adoption in low and middle-income countries. This study assesses the cost-utility of home-based HPV self-sampling versus VIA for cervical cancer screening in India.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in East district, Sikkim, India, comparing the costs and utility outcomes of population-based cervical cancer screening through VIA and primary HPV screening through self-sampling. Cost-related data were collected from April 2021 to March 2022 using the bottom-up micro-costing method, while utility measures were collected prospectively using the EuroQoL-5D-5L questionnaire. The utility values were converted into quality-adjusted life days (QALDs) for an 8-day period. The willingness to pay threshold (WTP) was based on per capita GDP for 2022. If the calculated Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) value is lower than the WTP threshold, it signifies that the intervention is cost-effective.
RESULTS: The study included 95 women in each group of cervical cancer screening with VIA & HPV self-sampling. For eight days, the QALD was found to be 7.977 for the VIA group and 8.0 for the HPV group. The unit cost per woman screened by VIA and HPV self-testing was ₹1,597 (US$ 19.2) and ₹1,271(US$ 15.3), respectively. The ICER was ₹-14,459 (US$ -173.6), which was much below the WTP threshold for eight QALDs, i.e. ₹ 4,193 (US$ 50.4).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings support HPV self-sampling as a cost-effective alternative to VIA. This informs policymakers and healthcare providers for better resource allocation in cervical cancer screening in Sikkim.