UNASSIGNED: Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) prevent heart failure (HF) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) but prescription rates are low. The effect of an electronic health record (EHR) alert notifying providers of patients\' estimated risk of developing HF on SGTL2i prescriptions is unknown.
UNASSIGNED: This was a pragmatic, randomized clinical trial that compared an EHR alert and usual care among patients with T2DM and no history of HF or SGLT2i use at a single center. The EHR alert notified providers of their patient\'s HF risk and recommended HF prevention strategies. Randomization was performed at the provider level across general and subspecialty internal medicine as well as family medicine outpatient clinics. The primary outcome was proportion of SGLT2i prescriptions within 30 days. Proportion of natriuretic peptide (NP) tests within 90 days was also assessed.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 1524 patients (median age 75 years, 45% women, 23% Black) were enrolled between September 28, 2021, and April 29, 2022 from 189 outpatient clinics. SGLT2i were prescribed to 1.2% (9/780) of patients in the EHR alert group and 0% (0/744) of those in the usual care group (P value = 0.009). Natriuretic peptide testing was performed within 90 days among 10.8% (84/780) of patients in the EHR alert group and 7.3% (54/744) of patients in the usual care group (P value = 0.02).
UNASSIGNED: In a single-center trial with low overall SGLT2i use, an EHR alert incorporating HF risk information significantly increased SGLT2i prescriptions and NP testing although the absolute rates were low.

UNASSIGNED: Cardiac remodeling is an adverse phenomenon linked to heart failure (HF) progression. Cardiac remodeling could represent the real therapeutic goal in the treatment of patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), being potentially reversed through different pharmacotherapies. Currently, there are well-established drugs such as ACEi/ARBs and β-blockers with anti-remodeling effects. More recently, ARNI effects on cardiac remodeling were also demonstrated; additional potential benefits of gliflozins remain non clearly demonstrated.
UNASSIGNED: To evaluate possible changes in cardiac remodeling in patients with HFrEF/HFmrEF in treatment with ARNI or ARNI plus SGLT2i and the potential benefit on cardiac remodeling of adding SGLT2i to ARNI.
UNASSIGNED: Between June 2021 and August 2023, 100 consecutive patients with HFrEF/HFmrEF underwent conventional and advanced echocardiography (TDI, 2DSTE): patients were therefore divided into three groups according to therapy with neither ARNI nor SGLT2i, just ARNI or both. After 3 months, all patients underwent echocardiographic follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: After a 3 months of therapy, significant improvements were observed for LVEF, LVEDD, LVEDV, LVESV, LV mass, E/e\', LV GLS, TAPSE (ANOVA p< 0.01 in all cases), RV S\' velocity (ANOVA p< 0.001).The trend in favor of additional treatment with SGTL2i over ARNI remained statistically significant even after multivariable analysis (p< 0.001 for LVEF, LVEDD; p< 0.01 for LV GLS, TAPSE, TRVS; p< 0.05 for LV mass).
UNASSIGNED: SGLT2i therapy when added to the standard treatment for HFrEF and HFmrEF is associated with an improved biventricular function and ventricular dimensions at follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Vericiguat has demonstrated efficacy in improving the prognosis of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) following recent clinical deterioration. However, its real-world impact on reducing N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels and improving ventricular remodeling remains uncertain in stable HFrEF patients receiving guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) over the short term.
METHODS: This multicenter, observational cohort study included 200 HFrEF patients. Patients were grouped based on their preference for vericiguat use. We evaluated the impact of vericiguat on HFrEF patients by analyzing the difference in the proportion of patients with NT-proBNP levels ≤1000 pg/ml between two groups after a 6-month follow-up, using logistic regression and covariance analysis. Changes in echocardiographic parameters, left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) ratio, and safety outcomes were also evaluated.
RESULTS: During the 6-month follow-up, 105 patients (82.68 %) in the vericiguat group and 46 patients (63.01 %) in the control group reached the primary endpoint. Multivariate logistic regression confirmed vericiguat as a significant factor in reducing NT-proBNP levels (Model 2: odds ratio (OR) = 2.67, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.24-5.77, P = 0.013), but it showed no significant association with LVRR (Model 2: OR = 0.52, 95 % CI: 0.24-1.13, P = 0.097). The safety analysis indicated a higher incidence of mild to moderate gastrointestinal symptoms in the vericiguat group compared to the control group (23.62 % vs. 2.74 %, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Vericiguat significantly reduced NT-proBNP levels in patients with chronic HErEF under GDMT but was ineffective for LVRR during the 6-month follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: Body fat distribution plays a significant role in the cardiometabolic consequences of obesity. We review the impact of visceral and hepatic fat and highlight important interventions.
RESULTS: Several epidemiologic studies have established a clear association between visceral fat and cardiovascular disease. The association between hepatic fat and cardiovascular disease is less clear with discordant results. Novel evidence demonstrates sodium glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors facilitate modest weight loss and reductions in ectopic fat depots in patient with type 2 diabetes. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have been associated with decreased visceral/hepatic fat and reductions in MACE in populations with type 2 diabetes and with overweight/obesity. Clear associations between visceral fat and cardiometabolic outcomes have been established, whereas the impact of hepatic fat remains less clear. Lifestyle modification and pharmacologic interventions remain the initial therapies, while surgical intervention is associated with improved long-term outcomes. Emerging therapies have demonstrated a profound impact on body fat distribution and cardiometabolic risk.

Integrating sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) into the treatment for chronic kidney disease (CKD) has marked a significant therapeutic advance in nephrology. Clinical trials such as DAPA-CKD and EMPA-KIDNEY have demonstrated the beneficial effects of SGLT2i in slowing CKD progression and reducing proteinuria. However, the applicability of these results to patients with glomerulonephritis is still unresolved due to various limitations. This manuscript combines the evidence supporting the use of SGLT2i in glomerular diseases, highlights the limitations and strikes a conclusive balance on their role in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Despite sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi) being cost-effective evidenced-based therapies for the management of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF), research shows that less than 30% of patients with HFrEF are prescribed these agents.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to understand clinician-perceived barriers and facilitators to prescribing ARNi and SGLT2i in patients with HFrEF.
METHODS: We conducted virtual and in-person semi-structured interviews in a large integrated healthcare delivery system in the United States. Twenty cardiology clinicians managing patients with HFrEF were recruited using purposeful sampling to target providers across professions and practice sites. The interview guide was developed based on a literature review and insights from a practicing cardiologist. It inquired about perceived prescribing behaviors, focusing on factors affecting the use of ARNi and SGLT2i. We identified key themes using rapid qualitative analysis.
RESULTS: Twenty clinicians were interviewed: 13 physicians, five advanced practitioners, and two clinic-based pharmacists. Eighteen interviews were analyzed; we excluded two as the clinicians interviewed did not meet the inclusion criteria. Three major themes were identified: 1) clinician-reported prescribing patterns don\'t always align with the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for the use of SGLT2i and ARNi due to clinical inertia, lack of familiarity, knowledge, and comfort with use, and concerns over polypharmacy or adverse events, 2) clinician-perceived and actual out-of-pocket cost reduced prescribing of ARNi or SGLT2i to patients, exacerbated by a lack of visibility into patients\' prescription coverage, denials of coverage by insurance, and navigating prior authorization related workflows, and 3) incorporation of a clinic-based pharmacist increased the prescribing of these medications.
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing cost transparency, implementing interventions to overcome clinical inertia and cost hurdles, and increasing clinic-based pharmacist support may improve evidenced-based prescribing in patients with HFrEF, especially for comparatively novel classes such as ARNi and SGLT2i.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represents a major comorbidity in the elderly and is associated with cognitive impairment (CoI) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In this context, there is an increase in oxidative stress and platelet activation biomarkers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of 6 months\' treatment with SGLT2i on functional, mood-related, and cognitive aspects, assessed by performing a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), and on oxidative stress and platelet activation biomarkers, in a cohort of HFpEF elderly patients with T2DM. We recruited 150 elderly outpatients (mean age 75.8 ± 7.4 years).
RESULTS: At six-month follow-up, there was a significant improvement in MMSE (p < 0.0001), MoCA (p < 0.0001), GDS score (p < 0.0001), and SPPB (p < 0.0001). Moreover, we observed a significant reduction in Nox-2 (p < 0.0001), 8-Isoprostane (p < 0.0001), Sp-Selectin (p < 0.0001), and Gp-VI (p < 0.0001). Considering ΔMMSE as the dependent variable, ΔE/e\', ΔNox-2, ΔHOMA, Δ8-Isoprostane, and ΔUricemia were associated for 59.6% with ΔMMSE. When ΔMoCA was considered as the dependent variable, ΔHOMA, ΔE/e\', Δ8-Isoprostane, ΔNox-2 and ΔUricemia were associated for 59.2%. Considering ΔGDS as the dependent variable, ΔHOMA, ΔNox-2, Δ8-Isoprostane, and ΔUricemia were associated with 41.6% of ΔGDS variation. Finally, ΔHOMA was the main predictor of ΔSPPB, which was associated with 21.3% with ΔSPPB, Δ8-Isoprostane, ΔNox-2, ΔE/e\', and ΔUricemia added another 24.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of SGLT2i in elderly patients with T2DM and HFpEF significantly contributes to improving CGA scales and biomarkers of OS and PA.

Pathological tissues release a variety of factors, including extracellular vesicles (EVs) shed by activated or apoptotic cells. EVs trapped within the native pathological valves may act as key mediators of valve thrombosis. Human aortic stenosis EVs promote activation of valvular endothelial cells, leading to endothelial dysfunction, and proadhesive and procoagulant responses.

BACKGROUND: The impact of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence outcomes and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients after AF ablation is unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether SGLT2i reduces the risk of AF recurrence and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in HF patients after AF ablation.
METHODS: HF patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation between January 2017 and December 2022 from the China-AF Registry were included. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on the use of SGLT2i at discharge and were 1:1 matched by propensity score, with SGLT2i using (n=368) and non-SGLT2i using (n=368) in each group. The primary outcome was AF recurrence after a 3-month blanking period.
RESULTS: During a total of 1315 person-year follow-ups, AF recurrence occurred in 83 patients (22.6%) in the SGLT2i group and 132 patients (35.8%) in the non-SGLT2i group. SGLT2i was associated with a lower risk of AF recurrence (adjusted HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.43-0.74, P<0.001). The composite risk of cardiovascular death, thrombotic events, or cardiovascular hospitalization was significantly lower in the SGLT2i group compared with those without SGLT2i (adjusted HR = 0.58, 95%CI: 0.41-0.80, p = 0.001). Although there was a trend toward benefits, the differences in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, or thrombotic events were insignificant between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of SGLT2i was associated with a lower risk of AF recurrence and the composite outcome of cardiovascular death, thrombotic events, or cardiovascular hospitalization after catheter ablation for AF in patients with HF.

UNASSIGNED: From 2008 and following the withdrawal of rosiglitazone, obligatory cardiovascular outcomes trials are performed for glucose lowering drugs introduced to the market to ensure their cardiovascular (CV) safety. Paradoxically, these studies have demonstrated CV safety but also shown additional cardio-reno-vascular protection of some therapeutic agents. Additionally, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (ns-MRA) have emerged as novel drugs for cardio - and renoprotection in type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). In addition to atherosclerotic CV disease, heart failure (HF) and CKD are important clinical problems in T2D leading to poor quality of life and premature death as such cardio-reno-vascular protection is an important clinical issue.
UNASSIGNED: We provide new insights into pharmacotherapeutic cardio-reno-vascular protection in T2D based on the new glucose lowering drugs and ns-MRA. PUB MED/CINAHL/Web of Science/Scopus were searched (May 2024).
UNASSIGNED: The conventional glucose lowering approach alone which was implemented for decades is now replaced by the use of disease modifying drugs which lower the rates of CV events, HF decompensation, hospitalization due to HF, slow progression of CKD and all-cause mortality. Indeed, the choice of medications in T2D should be focused on underlying co-morbidities with cardio-reno-vascular protection rather than a gluco-centric approach.