Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction

非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死
  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前尚不清楚非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)和严重左心室(LV)功能障碍患者的最佳血运重建时机。全国共386例NSTEMI患者伴有严重的LV功能障碍,多中心,并纳入前瞻性韩国急性心肌梗死登记处V(KAMIR-V)。严重的LV功能障碍定义为LV射血分数≤35%。排除心源性休克患者。将患者分为两组:24小时内PCI(早期侵入组)和24小时内PCI(选择性侵入组)。主要终点是主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE),包括全因死亡,非致命性MI,重复血运重建,以及索引程序后12个月的中风。早期侵入性组的院内死亡发生率较高(9.4%vs3.3%,P=.036)和心源性休克(11.5%vs4.6%,P=.030)PCI术后。早期侵入组在入院期间也显示出更高的最大肌钙蛋白I水平(27.7±44.8ng/mLvs14.9±24.6ng/mL,P=.001),与选择性侵入组相比。早期侵入组有12个月MACCE的风险增加,与选择性侵入组相比(25.6%vs17.1%;校正后HR=2.10,95%CI1.17-3.77,P=.006)。在NSTEMI患者中,有严重的LV功能障碍,早期侵入性策略并未改善临床结局.该数据支持个性化方法可能使高风险NSTEMI患者受益,而不是常规的侵入性方法。
    Optimal timing of revascularization for patients who presented with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is unclear. A total of 386 NSTEMI patients with severe LV dysfunction from the nationwide, multicenter, and prospective Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry V (KAMIR-V) were enrolled. Severe LV dysfunction was defined as LV ejection fraction ≤ 35%. Patients with cardiogenic shock were excluded. Patients were stratified into two groups: PCI within 24 hours (early invasive group) and PCI over 24 hours (selective invasive group). Primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) including all-cause death, non-fatal MI, repeat revascularization, and stroke at 12 months after index procedure. Early invasive group showed higher incidence of in-hospital death (9.4% vs 3.3%, P = .036) and cardiogenic shock (11.5% vs 4.6%, P = .030) after PCI. Early invasive group also showed higher maximum troponin I level during admission (27.7 ± 44.8 ng/mL vs 14.9 ± 24.6 ng/mL, P = .001), compared with the selective invasive group. Early invasive group had an increased risk of 12-month MACCE, compared with selective invasive group (25.6% vs 17.1%; adjusted HR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.17-3.77, P = .006). Among NSTEMI patients with severe LV dysfunction, the early invasive strategy did not improve the clinical outcomes. This data supports that an individualized approach may benefit high-risk NSTEMI patients rather than a routine invasive approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们使用2016年至2022年西班牙国家医院出院数据,根据糖尿病(DM)状态(非糖尿病,非糖尿病,1-DM型或2-DM型)。
    方法:我们建立了STEMI/NSTEMI按DM状态分层的逻辑回归模型,以确定与住院死亡率(IHM)相关的变量。我们分析了DM对IHM的影响。
    结果:西班牙医院报告了201,950个STEMIs(72.7%非糖尿病,0.5%1型DM,和26.8%的2型糖尿病;26.3%的女性)和167,285NSTEMIs(61.6%的非糖尿病,0.6%类型1-DM,和37.8%的2型糖尿病;30.9%的女性)。在STEMI中,非糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的频率增加(60.4%vs.68.6%;p<0.001)和2型糖尿病患者(53.6%vs.66.1%;p<0.001)。在NSTEMI,非糖尿病患者的PCI频率增加(43.7%vs.45.7%;p<0.001)和2型糖尿病患者(39.1%vs.42.8%;p<0.001)。在NSTEMI,非糖尿病人群中冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的频率增加(2.8%vs.3.5%;p<0.001)和2型糖尿病患者(3.7%vs.5.0%;p<0.001)。在整个人口中,较低的IHM与PCI相关(STEMI的比值比[OR][95%置信区间]=0.34[0.32-0.35];NSTEMI的比值比为0.24[0.23-0.26])或CABG(STEMI的比值比为0.33[0.27-0.40];NSTEMI的比值比为0.45[0.38-0.53]).在STEMI中,IHM随时间降低(OR=0.86[0.80-0.93])。2型DM与STEMI患者较高的IHM相关(OR=1.06[1.01-1.11])。
    结论:PCI和CABG与STEMI/NSTEMI患者IHM降低相关。2型DM与STEMI患者的IHM相关。
    BACKGROUND: We used the Spanish national hospital discharge data from 2016 to 2022 to analyze procedures and hospital outcomes among patients aged ≥ 18 years admitted for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) according to diabetes mellitus (DM) status (non-diabetic, type 1-DM or type 2-DM).
    METHODS: We built logistic regression models for STEMI/NSTEMI stratified by DM status to identify variables associated with in-hospital mortality (IHM). We analyzed the effect of DM on IHM.
    RESULTS: Spanish hospitals reported 201,950 STEMIs (72.7% non-diabetic, 0.5% type 1-DM, and 26.8% type 2-DM; 26.3% female) and 167,285 NSTEMIs (61.6% non-diabetic, 0.6% type 1-DM, and 37.8% type 2-DM; 30.9% female). In STEMI, the frequency of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) increased among non-diabetic people (60.4% vs. 68.6%; p < 0.001) and people with type 2-DM (53.6% vs. 66.1%; p < 0.001). In NSTEMI, the frequency of PCI increased among non-diabetic people (43.7% vs. 45.7%; p < 0.001) and people with type 2-DM (39.1% vs. 42.8%; p < 0.001). In NSTEMI, the frequency of coronary artery by-pass grafting (CABG) increased among non-diabetic people (2.8% vs. 3.5%; p < 0.001) and people with type 2-DM (3.7% vs. 5.0%; p < 0.001). In the entire population, lower IHM was associated with undergoing PCI (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval] = 0.34 [0.32-0.35] in STEMI; 0.24 [0.23-0.26] in NSTEMI) or CABG (0.33 [0.27-0.40] in STEMI; 0.45 [0.38-0.53] in NSTEMI). IHM decreased over time in STEMI (OR = 0.86 [0.80-0.93]). Type 2-DM was associated with higher IHM in STEMI (OR = 1.06 [1.01-1.11]).
    CONCLUSIONS: PCI and CABG were associated with lower IHM in people admitted for STEMI/NSTEMI. Type 2-DM was associated with IHM in STEMI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)是一种冠心病(CHD),占35岁以上人群总死亡人数的三分之一。尽管心肌肌钙蛋白是心肌坏死的金标准,但它对于没有坏死的缺血是盲目的。研究表明,与心肌肌钙蛋白T和心电图相比,缺血修饰白蛋白(IMA)在诊断缺血性胸痛中更敏感。它与这些测试的结合显着增加了诊断不稳定型心绞痛的敏感性,非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI),或ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI),具有较高的阳性和阴性预测值,使其成为在急诊科诊断不确定的患者中排除ACS的有价值的工具。
    方法:这项前瞻性队列研究,在教学医院进行,Peradeniya,斯里兰卡,从2015年到2019年,调查了330例急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者的缺血修饰白蛋白(IMA)水平。不包括患有各种慢性病的人和服用特定药物的人,基于钴(II)与受心肌缺血影响的人血清白蛋白的结合,采用比色法分析血清IMA.测量血清IMA水平,和统计分析,包括非参数检验和相关性分析,进行评估IMA水平与各种人口统计学和临床因素之间的关联。
    结果:发现IMA浓度是非正态分布的,平均浓度为0.252±0.123AU。没有观察到IMA水平的总体显着性别差异,虽然在较年轻的年龄组(<59岁),男性的IMA浓度高于女性。在年轻年龄组观察到显著的性别差异,男性的IMA水平高于女性(p=0.033)。在不同种族(p=0.217)或BMI类别(p=0.056)之间,IMA水平没有显着差异。与对照受试者相比,ACS患者的IMA水平显着增加(p<0.001)。相关分析显示IMA水平与总胆固醇(r=0.262,p=0.009)和低密度脂蛋白(LDL)水平(r=0.280,p=0.006)之间存在显着关联。值得注意的是,肥胖患者的IMA水平存在显著的性别差异,提示肥胖反应的生理差异。该研究还显示,与不稳定型心绞痛患者相比,NSTEMI和STEMI患者的IMA浓度更高。
    结论:研究证实ACS患者IMA水平升高,支持其诊断潜力。它揭示了人口影响,例如年轻男性的IMA水平较高,肥胖患者的性别差异显著。考虑人口统计学和血脂管理的个性化方法对于降低ACS风险和IMA在管理中的作用至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a type of coronary heart disease (CHD), which is responsible for one-third of total deaths in people older than 35 years. Even though cardiac troponin is the gold standard for myocardial necrosis it is blind for ischemia without necrosis. Studies demonstrate that Ischaemia Modified Albumin (IMA) is more sensitive in diagnosing ischemic chest pain compared to cardiac troponin T and electrocardiogram, and its combination with these tests significantly increases the sensitivity for diagnosing unstable angina, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), or ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), with high positive and negative predictive values, making it a valuable tool for ruling out ACS in patients with inconclusive diagnoses in the emergency department.
    METHODS: This prospective cohort study, conducted at the Teaching Hospital, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, from 2015 to 2019, investigated ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) levels in 330 acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Excluding those with various chronic conditions and those on specific medications, serum IMA was analyzed using a colorimetric assay based on cobalt (II) binding to human serum albumin affected by myocardial ischemia. Serum IMA levels were measured, and statistical analyses, including non-parametric tests and correlation analyses, were conducted to evaluate the association between IMA levels and various demographic and clinical factors.
    RESULTS: IMA concentrations were found to be non-normally distributed, with an average concentration of 0.252 ± 0.123 AU. No overall significant gender-based difference in IMA levels was observed, though within the younger age group (< 59 years), males exhibited higher IMA concentrations than females. Significant gender differences were observed in the younger age group, with males showing higher IMA levels than females (p = 0.033). No significant differences in IMA levels were found across different ethnicities (p = 0.217) or BMI categories (p = 0.056). A significant increase in IMA levels was noted in ACS patients compared to control subjects (p < 0.001). Correlation analysis revealed significant associations between IMA levels and total cholesterol (r = 0.262, p = 0.009) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels (r = 0.280, p = 0.006). Notably, a significant gender difference in IMA levels was found in obese patients, suggesting physiological differences in response to obesity. The study also revealed higher IMA concentrations in NSTEMI and STEMI patients compared to those with unstable angina.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms elevated IMA levels in ACS patients, supporting its diagnostic potential. It reveals demographic influences, such as higher IMA levels in younger males and significant gender-specific differences in obese patients. Personalized approaches considering demographics and lipid management are essential for ACS risk reduction and IMA\'s role in management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    循环D-二聚体水平升高已被证明是多种疾病住院死亡率的预测指标;然而,D-二聚体与非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者院内预后的关系尚不清楚.这项回顾性研究包括662例非糖尿病NSTEMI患者。通过多变量分析确定了独立的危险因素,受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析比较D-二聚体的预测值,白蛋白(ALB),和D-二聚体与白蛋白比值(DAR)用于NSTEMI住院死亡。采用限制性三次样条(RCS)Logistic回归模型进一步探讨D-二聚体与死亡风险的线性或非线性关系。38例(5.7%)患者发生院内死亡。多因素分析显示,D-二聚体(每增加500ng)是非糖尿病NSTEMI患者住院死亡率的独立预测因子(OR=1.19,95%CI:1.03-1.40,P=0.036)。D-二聚体对院内死亡率表现出良好的预测性能,ROC曲线下面积(AUC)值为0.75(95%CI:0.66-0.83),D-二聚体的预测能力差异无统计学意义,ALB(AUC=0.70,95%CI:0.61-0.79)和DAR(AUC=0.75,95%CI:0.66-0.84)。此外,RCS分析显示D-二聚体与院内死亡风险呈线性关系(非线性P=0.747)。D-二聚体可以作为一种简单的,用于预测NSTEMI非糖尿病患者院内死亡率的可靠且有价值的生物标志物与死亡风险呈线性关系.
    Elevated circulating D-dimer levels have been shown to be a predictor of in-hospital mortality in a variety of diseases; however, the relationship between D-dimer and the in-hospital prognosis of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) remains unclear. This retrospective study included 662 non-diabetic patients with NSTEMI. Independent risk factors were identified by multivariate analyses, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to compare the predictive value of D-dimer, albumin (ALB), and D-dimer to albumin ratio (DAR) for in-hospital death in NSTEMI. Logistic regression model with restricted cubic spline (RCS) was used to further explore the linear or nonlinear relationship between D-dimer and the risk of death. In-hospital mortality occurred in 38 (5.7%) patients. Multivariate analysis showed that D-dimer (per increase of 500 ng) was identified as an independent predictor for in-hospital mortality in non-diabetic patients with NSTEMI (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.03-1.40, P = 0.036). D-dimer demonstrated good predictive performance for in-hospital mortality with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) value of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.66-0.83), and there was no significant difference in the predictive ability of D-dimer, ALB (AUC = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.61-0.79) and DAR (AUC = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.66-0.84). In addition, RCS analysis showed a linear relationship between D-dimer and the risk of in-hospital mortality (P for nonlinear = 0.747). D-dimer can be used as a simple, reliable and valuable biomarker for predicting in-hospital mortality in non-diabetic patients with NSTEMI and is linearly associated with the risk of death.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非ST段抬高急性心肌梗死(NSTEMI)是一种危及生命的临床急症,预后不良。然而,没有个性化的列线图模型来识别可能发生死亡的NSTEMI高危患者.这项研究的目的是开发NSTEMI患者住院死亡率的列线图,以促进患者的快速风险分层。本研究共纳入774例非糖尿病NSTEMI患者。最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归用于初步筛选潜在的预测因子。进行单变量和多变量逻辑回归(反向逐步选择)分析以确定预测模型的最佳预测因子。基于这些预测因子构建相应的列线图。接收机工作特性曲线,GiViTI校准图,和决策曲线分析(DCA)用于评估列线图的性能。由六个预测因子组成的列线图模型:年龄(OR=1.10;95%CI:1.05-1.15),血尿素氮(OR=1.06;95%CI:1.00-1.12),白蛋白(OR=0.93;95%CI:0.87-1.00),甘油三酯(OR=1.41;95%CI:1.09-2.00),D-二聚体(OR=1.39;95%CI:1.06-1.80),和阿司匹林(OR=0.16;95%CI:0.06-0.42)。列线图具有良好的鉴别性(曲线下面积(AUC)=0.89,95%CI:0.84-0.94),校准,和临床有用性。在这项研究中,我们建立了基于常用临床指标预测NSTEMI患者院内死亡率的列线图模型.建议的列线图具有良好的性能,允许快速对NSTEMI患者进行风险分层。
    Non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is a life-threatening clinical emergency with a poor prognosis. However, there are no individualized nomogram models to identify patients at high risk of NSTEMI who may undergo death. The aim of this study was to develop a nomogram for in-hospital mortality in patients with NSTEMI to facilitate rapid risk stratification of patients. A total of 774 non-diabetic patients with NSTEMI were included in this study. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression was used to initially screen potential predictors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression (backward stepwise selection) analyses were performed to identify the optimal predictors for the prediction model. The corresponding nomogram was constructed based on those predictors. The receiver operating characteristic curve, GiViTI calibration plot, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the performance of the nomogram. The nomogram model consisting of six predictors: age (OR = 1.10; 95% CI: 1.05-1.15), blood urea nitrogen (OR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.00-1.12), albumin (OR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.87-1.00), triglyceride (OR = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.09-2.00), D-dimer (OR = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.06-1.80), and aspirin (OR = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.06-0.42). The nomogram had good discrimination (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.94), calibration, and clinical usefulness. In this study, we developed a nomogram model to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with NSTEMI based on common clinical indicators. The proposed nomogram has good performance, allowing rapid risk stratification of patients with NSTEMI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:与年轻患者相比,老年人接受NSTEMI侵入性冠状动脉造影(ICA)的频率较低。我们描述护理,ICA数据,在当代和地理上不同的队列中,按年龄划分的NSTEMI的住院和30天结局。
    方法:前瞻性队列研究,包括来自59个国家287个中心的2947例NSTEMI患者,按年龄分层(≥75岁,n=761)。基于12项指南推荐的护理干预措施评估了护理质量,以及在ICA上收集的数据。结果包括在医院急性心力衰竭,心源性休克,重复心肌梗死,中风/短暂性脑缺血发作,BARC≥3型出血和死亡,以及30天的死亡率。
    结果:年龄≥75岁的患者,与年轻患者相比,报告中合并症和口服抗凝处方的患病率较高(22.4%vs7.6%,p<0.001)。老年患者接受ICA的频率低于年轻患者(78.6%vs90.6%,p<0.001),记录的原因更多是高龄,合并症或虚弱。在那些接受了ICA的人中,老年患者更频繁地表现出3血管,与年轻患者相比,4血管和/或左主干冠状动脉疾病(49.7%vs34.1%,p<0.001),但接受血运重建的频率较低(63.6%对76.9%,p<0.001)。老年患者院内急性心力衰竭的发生率较高(15.0%vs8.4%,p<0.001)和出血(2.8%vs1.3%,p=0.006),以及住院和30天死亡率(3.4%和1.3%,p<0.001;4.8%对1.7%,p<0.001;分别),比年轻患者。
    结论:年龄≥75岁的NSTEMI患者,与年轻患者相比,不太频繁地接受ICA和指南推荐的护理,短期结果更差。
    BACKGROUND: Older people less frequently receive invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for NSTEMI than younger patients. We describe care, ICA data, and in-hospital and 30-day outcomes of NSTEMI by age in a contemporary and geographically diverse cohort.
    METHODS: Prospective cohort study including 2947 patients with NSTEMI from 287 centres in 59 countries, stratified by age (≥75 years, n = 761). Quality of care was evaluated based on 12 guideline-recommended care interventions, and data collected on ICA. Outcomes included in hospital acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, repeat myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, BARC Type ≥3 bleeding and death, as well as 30-day mortality.
    RESULTS: Patients aged ≥75 years, compared with younger patients, at presentation had a higher prevalence of comorbidities and oral anticoagulation prescription (22.4% vs 7.6%, p < 0.001). Older patients less frequently received ICA than younger patients (78.6% vs 90.6%, p < 0.001) with the recorded reason more often being advanced age, comorbidities or frailty. Of those who underwent ICA, older patients more frequently demonstrated 3-vessel, 4-vessel and/or left main stem coronary artery disease compared to younger patients (49.7% vs 34.1%, p < 0.001) but less frequently received revascularisation (63.6% vs 76.9%, p < 0.001). Older patients experienced higher rates of in-hospital acute heart failure (15.0% vs 8.4%, p < 0.001) and bleeding (2.8% vs 1.3%, p = 0.006), as well as in-hospital and 30-day mortality (3.4% vs 1.3%, p < 0.001; 4.8% vs 1.7%, p < 0.001; respectively), than younger patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients aged ≥75 years with NSTEMI, compared with younger patients, less frequently received ICA and guideline-recommended care, and had worse short-term outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:糖尿病(DM)和冠状动脉微血管功能障碍(CMD)会增加非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者发生不良心脏事件的风险。本研究旨在评估DM和CMD的综合风险估计,通过血管造影得出的微循环阻力指数(血管IMR)评估,NSTEMI患者。
    方法:回顾性纳入3个中心2212例成功经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的NSTEMI患者。主要结局是心脏死亡或心力衰竭再入院2年随访的复合结果。
    结果:DM组和非DM组之间的PCI后血管IMR没有显着差异(20.13[17.91-22.70]vs.20.19[18.14-22.77],P=0.530)。与非DM患者相比,DM患者在2年内表现出明显更高的心源性死亡或心力衰竭再入院的风险(9.5%vs.5.4%,P<0.001)。同时患有DM和CMD的NSTEMI患者在2年时心源性死亡或心力衰竭再入院的累积发生率最高(24.0%,P<0.001)。在NSTEMI患者中,DM和CMD的组合被确定为2年时心脏死亡或心力衰竭再入院的最有力的独立预测因子(调整后的HR:7.894,[95%CI,4.251-14.659],p<0.001)。
    结论:在NSTEMI患者中,DM和CMD的组合是心源性死亡或心力衰竭再入院的独立预测因子.Angio-IMR可用作治疗NSTEMIDM患者的额外评估工具。
    背景:URL:https://www。
    结果:gov;唯一标识符:NCT05696379。
    BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) and coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) increase the risk of adverse cardiac events in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). This study aimed to evaluate the combined risk estimates of DM and CMD, assessed by the angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (angio-IMR), in patients with NSTEMI.
    METHODS: A total of 2212 patients with NSTEMI who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were retrospectively enrolled from three centers. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death or readmission for heart failure at a 2-year follow-up.
    RESULTS: Post-PCI angio-IMR did not significantly differ between the DM group and the non-DM group (20.13 [17.91-22.70] vs. 20.19 [18.14-22.77], P = 0.530). DM patients exhibited a notably higher risk of cardiac death or readmission for heart failure at 2 years compared to non-DM patients (9.5% vs. 5.4%, P < 0.001). NSTEMI patients with both DM and CMD experienced the highest cumulative incidence of cardiac death or readmission for heart failure at 2 years (24.0%, P < 0.001). The combination of DM and CMD in NSTEMI patients were identified as the most powerful independent predictor for cardiac death or readmission for heart failure at 2 years (adjusted HR: 7.894, [95% CI, 4.251-14.659], p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NSTEMI, the combination of DM and CMD is an independent predictor of cardiac death or readmission for heart failure. Angio-IMR could be used as an additional evaluation tool for the management of NSTEMI patients with DM.
    BACKGROUND: URL: https://www.
    RESULTS: gov ; Unique identifier: NCT05696379.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)是否可以改善急性胸痛和不确定的高敏肌钙蛋白(hs-肌钙蛋白)患者的诊断检查。
    方法:我们进行了前瞻性,失明,观察,多中心研究。纳入了30-80岁到急诊科就诊的急性胸痛和hs-肌钙蛋白升高的患者,并接受了CCTA。主要结果是CCTA狭窄≥50%的诊断准确性,以识别1型非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者。
    结果:共纳入106例患者(平均年龄65±10岁,29%为女性),其中20例(19%)确诊为1型NSTE-ACS。在45名患者中,CCTA显示非阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)或无CAD。灵敏度,特异性,负预测值(NPV),CCTA上≥50%狭窄的阳性预测值和曲线下面积(AUC),以识别1型NSTE-ACS患者,为95%(95%置信区间:74-100),56%(45-68),98%(87-100),35%(29-41)和0.83(0.73-0.94),分别。当仅考虑直径≥2mm的冠状动脉节段进行1型NSTE-ACS的裁定时,灵敏度和净现值增加到100%。在8名患者中,CCTA能够检测临床相关的非冠状动脉发现。
    结论:CCTA没有≥50%的冠状动脉狭窄可用于排除hs-肌钙蛋白不确定升高的急性胸痛患者的1型NSTE-ACS。此外,CCTA可以通过检测引起急性胸痛和不确定的hs-肌钙蛋白升高的其他相关疾病来帮助改善诊断工作。
    结论:冠状动脉CTA(CCTA)可以安全地排除1型非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者出现急性胸痛和高质肌钙蛋白升高,同时还检测其他相关的非冠状动脉状况。
    背景:Clinicaltrials.gov(NCT03129659)。2017年4月26日登记要点:急性胸部不适是急诊科常见的投诉。在该人群中,CCTA对1型NSTE-ACS的阴性预测值非常高。CCTA可以作为评估模棱两可的ACS和评估其他病理的辅助手段。
    OBJECTIVE: To determine whether coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can improve the diagnostic work-up of patients with acute chest pain and inconclusively high-sensitivity troponins (hs-troponin).
    METHODS: We conducted a prospective, blinded, observational, multicentre study. Patients aged 30-80 years presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain and inconclusively elevated hs-troponins were included and underwent CCTA. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of ≥ 50% stenosis on CCTA to identify patients with type-1 non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).
    RESULTS: A total of 106 patients (mean age 65 ± 10, 29% women) were enrolled of whom 20 patients (19%) had an adjudicated diagnosis of type-1 NSTE-ACS. In 45 patients, CCTA revealed non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) or no CAD. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value and area-under-the-curve (AUC) of ≥ 50% stenosis on CCTA to identify patients with type 1 NSTE-ACS, was 95% (95% confidence interval: 74-100), 56% (45-68), 98% (87-100), 35% (29-41) and 0.83 (0.73-0.94), respectively. When only coronary segments with a diameter ≥ 2 mm were considered for the adjudication of type 1 NSTE-ACS, the sensitivity and NPV increased to 100%. In 8 patients, CCTA enabled the detection of clinically relevant non-coronary findings.
    CONCLUSIONS: The absence of ≥ 50% coronary artery stenosis on CCTA can be used to rule out type 1 NSTE-ACS in acute chest pain patients with inconclusively elevated hs-troponins. Additionally, CCTA can help improve the diagnostic work-up by detecting other relevant conditions that cause acute chest pain and inconclusively elevated hs-troponins.
    CONCLUSIONS: Coronary CTA (CCTA) can safely rule out type 1 non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) in patients presenting to the ED with acute chest pain and inconclusively elevated hs-troponins, while also detecting other relevant non-coronary conditions.
    BACKGROUND: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03129659). Registered on 26 April 2017 KEY POINTS: Acute chest discomfort is a common presenting complaint in the emergency department. CCTA achieved very high negative predictive values for type 1 NSTE-ACS in this population. CCTA can serve as an adjunct for evaluating equivocal ACS and evaluates for other pathology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肾动脉梗阻为顽固性高血压的常见原因,一些合并肾动脉梗阻的患者发作闪烁性肺水肿常被忽视。该文报道了1例急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的患者发作闪烁性肺水肿,择期行冠状动脉球囊扩张后病情稳定出院,门诊随访时表现为舒张性心力衰竭及顽固性高血压,最终诊断为肾动脉梗阻,给予肾动脉支架置入,术后3个月随访,舒张性心力衰竭好转,血压控制良好。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号