Marijuana

大麻
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,关于大麻消费的文化观点经历了重大改革,大麻的非刑事化和合法化现在是一个辩论的问题。决定因素的条件在社会之间是不同的;因此,每个社会都应该独立决定。在这里,伊朗在大麻合法化之前应该考虑的因素得到了解决。全球趋势,社会地位,对司法机构的影响,成本,对健康的影响,质量控制,改变物质使用模式,社会超脱,患病率的变化是讨论的决定因素。现在宗教,文化,法律地位抑制了患病率的增加,娱乐使用合法化导致消费大幅增加是不可取的。然而,医用大麻的合法化和生产应该列入议程,因为任何妨碍娱乐性大麻合法化的项目都不适用于医用大麻。研究应该继续减少不确定性,特别是通过将娱乐性大麻使用合法化的地区的销售系统中的大数据与社交媒体等大数据源相结合。
    Cultural perspectives on marijuana consumption have undergone substantial reforms in recent years, and the decriminalization and legalization of cannabis are a matter of debate now. The conditions of determining factors are not the same among societies; therefore, each society should decide independently. Herein, the considerations that Iran should contemplate before legalizing cannabis were addressed. Global trends, social status, influence on the judiciary, costs, health effects, quality control, shifting substance use patterns, societal detachment, and changes in prevalence were the discussed determinant factors. Now that religious, cultural, and legal status has suppressed the increase in prevalence, legalization of recreational use that leads to a significant increase in consumption is not advisable. However, the legalization and production of medical cannabis should be on the agenda, as none of the items that hinder the legalization of recreational cannabis do not apply to medical cannabis. Research should continue to reduce uncertainties, especially by combining big data from sale systems of areas where recreational cannabis use has been legalized with big data sources like social media.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:需要关于居住在社区中的双相情感障碍(BP)人群在对研究的信任和获得护理方面的差异的数据。我们通过双相情感障碍的终生病史来表征社区成员。我们假设那些有BP的人对研究的信任度会降低,少拜访健康提供者,与没有血压的人相比,参与研究的次数更少。我们还假设那些有BP的人更有可能有大麻(MJ)使用史。
    方法:本分析采用横截面设计。研究人群由来自HealthStreet社区参与计划的12,489名成员(78.0%)组成,他们接受了社区卫生工作者关于健康史和人口统计的采访。
    结果:在样本中,血压率为10.6%(n=1326)。那些报告BP的人比没有报告BP的人更有可能(n=11,163),报告肌肉,骨头,和心理健康问题,更年轻,女性,在过去的12个月里去看了医生,有兴趣参与研究,成为当前的MJ用户。BP组之间的信任没有差异。
    结论:我们的分析发现,患有BP的人更容易获得护理,对研究更感兴趣,因此,我们的主要假设被拒绝。我们的次要假设,有BP的人更有可能有使用MJ的历史。这些发现很重要,因为它们解决了围绕BP的文献中的关键空白,并为未来的社区水平研究奠定了基础。
    BACKGROUND: Data are needed on differences in community-dwelling populations with bipolar disorder (BP) regarding trust in research and access to care. We characterized community members by lifetime history of bipolar disorder. We hypothesized that those with BP would have less trust in research, visit a health provider less, and participate less in research than those without BP. We also hypothesized that those with BP would be more likely to have a history of marijuana (MJ) use.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional design was used for this analysis. The study population consisted of 12,489 members (78.0%) from the HealthStreet community engagement program who were interviewed by a Community Health Worker about health history and demographics.
    RESULTS: Among the sample, the rate of BP was 10.6% (n = 1326). Those reporting BP were more likely than those who did not (n = 11,163), to report muscle, bone, and mental health problems, to be younger, female, to have visited the doctor in the past 12 months, to be interested in participating in research, and be current MJ users. Trust did not differ between BP groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis found that persons with BP had higher access to care and more interest in research, thus our primary hypothesis was rejected. Our secondary hypothesis, that persons with BP were more likely to have a history of MJ use was upheld. These findings are important because they address a crucial gap in the literature surrounding BP and lay the groundwork for future community-level research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在分析认定为双性恋的中学生和高中生的烟草和大麻使用情况,同性恋,拉拉,或异性恋者使用2020年至2022年全国青年烟草调查(NYTS)的数据。通过比较不同性取向群体的物质使用模式,这项研究试图找出影响这些行为的差异和潜在的社会经济因素。
    分析了2020年至2022年NYTS的数据,关注关于曾经使用香烟的反应,电子烟,和不同性取向的学生的大麻。采用描述性统计和卡方检验来分析性取向组之间物质使用和社会经济指标的差异。
    在分析中包括的37541名学生中,在双性恋者中观察到物质使用的显著差异,同性恋,拉拉,异性恋学生。双性恋和同性恋学生的香烟使用率更高,电子烟,和大麻与异性恋学生相比。此外,社会经济差异,例如家庭车辆拥有率降低和休假机会减少,在双性恋和同性恋学生中被注意到。
    这些发现强调了青少年基于性取向在烟草和大麻使用方面的显著差异,反映了在LGBTQ成年人中观察到的差异。这些结果突出了有针对性的干预措施的重要性,教育举措,和适合LGBTQ青年独特需求的支持系统。解决社会经济差异和促进包容性环境是促进LGBTQ青少年健康和福祉的关键步骤。持续的研究和合作努力对于减轻健康差距和为所有青少年创造公平的环境至关重要。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to analyze tobacco and marijuana use by middle and high school students identifying as bisexual, gay, lesbian, or heterosexual using data from the National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS) spanning from 2020 to 2022. By comparing substance use patterns among different sexual orientation groups, the study sought to identify disparities and potential socioeconomic factors influencing these behaviors.
    UNASSIGNED: Data from the 2020 to 2022 NYTS were analyzed, focusing on responses regarding ever use of cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and marijuana by students of varying sexual orientations. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were employed to analyze differences in substance use and socioeconomic indicators between sexual orientation groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 37 541 students included in the analysis, significant differences in substance use were observed among bisexual, gay, lesbian, and heterosexual students. Bisexual and gay/lesbian students exhibited higher rates of ever use of cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and marijuana compared to heterosexual students. In addition, socioeconomic differences, such as lower rates of family vehicle ownership and reduced access to vacations, were noted among bisexual and gay/lesbian students.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings underscore significant differences in tobacco and marijuana use by adolescents based on sexual orientation, mirroring differences observed in LGBTQ adults. These results highlight the importance of targeted interventions, educational initiatives, and support systems tailored to the unique needs of LGBTQ youth. Addressing socioeconomic disparities and fostering inclusive environments are crucial steps in promoting the health and well-being of LGBTQ adolescents. Continued research and collaborative efforts are essential in mitigating health disparities and creating equitable environments for all adolescents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着获取大麻的增加,一种叫做大麻素剧吐综合征(CHS)的疾病有所增加。这项研究估计了北加州11年期间在急诊科就诊(ED)中可疑CHS的年度患病率。
    方法:这项回顾性观察性队列研究使用了来自北加州KaiserPermanente的电子健康记录。从2009年至2019年,使用两个CHS病例定义构建了两个成人队列(18+),其中CHS访视≥1次。主要定义使用基于过去研究的狭窄定义(CHS组1)和允许更广泛代码范围的探索性定义(CHS组2);两种定义都需要呕吐的初步诊断。每组报告使用对数链接泊松模型估计的CHS的年患病率和CHS访问的年计数率。
    结果:CHS组1包括57,227例CHS访视≥1例患者,CHS组2包括65,645例患者。十一年来,CHS在各组间增加,CHS第1组上升最快(患病率=2.75,95%置信区间[CI]2.65-2.85,p<0.0001,2009年至2019年与患病率=2.34,95%CI2.27-2.43)。CHS组1在ED访视中也表现出最大的增加(比率=2.35,95%CI2.27-2.43,p<0.0001)。
    结论:在大量的加利福尼亚人口中,可疑CHS随着时间的推移在不同的定义中增加。年患病率增加134-175%,取决于CHS定义。CHS组2的定义可能过于宽泛,并且ICD-10-CM编码中的变化可能影响估计。
    BACKGROUND: As access to cannabis has increased, there has been a rise in a condition called cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS). This study estimates annual prevalence of suspected CHS at emergency department visits (ED) over an 11-year period in Northern California.
    METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study used electronic health records from Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Two CHS case definitions were used to construct two cohorts of adults (18+) with ≥1 CHS visits from 2009 to 2019. The primary definition used a narrow definition based on past studies (CHS group 1) and an exploratory definition allowed for a broader range of codes (CHS group 2); both definitions required a primary diagnosis of vomiting. Annual prevalence of CHS and annual rates of counts of CHS visits estimated using a log-link Poisson model are reported per group.
    RESULTS: There were 57,227 patients with ≥1 CHS visits included in CHS group 1 and 65,645 patients included in CHS group 2. Over eleven years, CHS increased across groups with the fastest rise in CHS group 1 (prevalence ratio = 2.75, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.65-2.85, p<.0001 from 2009 to 2019 vs. prevalence ratio = 2.34, 95 % CI 2.27-2.43). CHS group 1 also exhibited the largest increase in ED visits (rate ratio = 2.35, 95 % CI 2.27-2.43, p<.0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: In a large California population, suspected CHS increased over time across definitions. Annual prevalence increased by 134-175 %, depending on CHS definition. CHS group 2\'s definition may have been too broad and changes in ICD-10-CM coding may have impacted estimates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    青少年和年轻人使用大麻的人数有所增加,然而,关于农村地区青少年使用大麻的研究很少。目前的文献认为,与城市和郊区的年轻人相比,农村地区的青少年倾向于使用更少的大麻和大麻相关产品。然而,地理特征可能会导致农村青年经历的独特压力源,导致先前未探索的使用差异。本研究的目的是通过研究不同地理背景的12年级学生一生使用大麻的模式,探索农村与地理区域之间的关系。使用来自监测未来研究数据库的数据,参与者是根据乡村分类的(农村,中等郊区/城市,大型郊区/城市)和地理区域(东北部,中西部,南,West),并对数据进行了分析,以调查终生大麻和哈希用法的差异。结果表明,东北和西部的农村青少年报告的终生大麻和哈希产品使用水平与城市/郊区的青少年相同;但是,中西部和南部地区的乡村存在差异。这些结果表明,农村青少年终生使用大麻在地理区域之间并不一致,这表明在制定预防性和教育性大麻计划时,应认真考虑地理因素。
    Marijuana use among adolescents and young adults has increased, however, there is a paucity of research concerning marijuana use among adolescents in rural areas. Current literature holds the assumption that adolescents in rural areas tend to use less marijuana and marijuana associated products compared with youth from urban and suburban areas. However, geographical features may contribute to unique stressors experienced by rural youth, resulting in distinct differences in usage that have been previously unexplored. The purpose of the current study was to explore the relationship between rurality and geographic region by examining patterns of lifetime marijuana use in 12th graders across various geographical backgrounds. Using data from the Monitoring the Future Study database, participants were classified based on rurality (rural, medium suburban/urban, large suburban/urban) and geographic region (Northeast, Midwest, South, West) and data was analyzed to investigate the differences in lifetime marijuana and hash usage. Results demonstrated that rural adolescents in the Northeast and West reported lifetime marijuana and hash product use at the same level as their urban/suburban counterparts; however, there were differences across rurality among Midwest and Southern regions. These results suggest that lifetime marijuana use among rural adolescents is not uniform across geographic regions, indicating that geography should be heavily considered when formulating preventative and educational marijuana programs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    衡量大麻需求的行为经济方法代表了一个经过充分验证的,评估危险大麻使用风险的低成本方法。一种广泛使用的大麻需求衡量标准是大麻购买任务(MPT),在多个样本中显示出良好的心理测量特性。然而,初步数据表明,变化可以提高任务生态有效性和可接受性。使用以白人为主的便利样本,这项研究旨在开发经修订的MPT,该MPT使用现代药房方案来更好地反映国家大麻使用趋势(例如,多种形式的大麻消费)。由于任务时间增加和难以估计下个月的购买,参与者的注意力不集中可能会影响需求指标。讨论了经验教训,以更好地反映自然使用的方式为未来评估大麻需求的努力提供信息:包括最大程度地减少参与者的负担,设置更高的价格上限以增加任务效用,并考虑可能影响需求的人层面因素。
    Behavioral economic approaches to measuring cannabis demand represent a well-validated, low-cost method of assessing risk for hazardous cannabis use. One widely used measure of cannabis demand is the Marijuana Purchase Task (MPT), which has shown good psychometric properties across multiple samples. However, preliminary data suggest that changes could improve task ecological validity and acceptability. Using a predominantly White convenience sample, this study aimed to develop a revised MPT that uses a modern dispensary scenario to better reflect national trends in cannabis use (e.g., multiple forms of cannabis consumption). Participant inattentiveness due to increased task length and difficulty estimating purchases for the next month may have impacted demand measures. Lessons learned are discussed to inform future efforts to assess cannabis demand in a manner that is more reflective of naturalistic use: including minimizing participant burden, setting higher price ceilings to increase task utility, and considering person-level factors that may influence demand.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    青少年和年轻人的大麻使用率正在上升。Further,使用各种形式的大麻(烟熏或vaped)和尼古丁(双重用途)在年轻人中越来越普遍。双重用途对健康的影响鲜为人知,特别是在高效大麻产品和不同给药途径的情况下,这在预测未来的健康结果方面是不祥的。大麻的使用与活动减少和零食增加有关的悠久历史,两者都可能预示着代谢和心血管疾病的风险增加,特别是当这些习惯在形成年开始。然而,现代形式的大麻可能没有这些相同的效果。这里,我们评估单独使用大麻和同时使用含尼古丁的大麻是否会影响年轻人的饮食和运动习惯。一个匿名的,基于社交媒体的调查是根据UCSanDiego吸入性问卷和已发布的饮食和运动问卷设计的。共完成了457项调查。年轻的大麻使用者占响应者的29%,16%是大麻和尼古丁的双重使用者,55%的人没有使用这两种药物。尽管单独使用大麻与相对于非使用者的饮食或活动差异无关,大麻和尼古丁的双重使用者报告说,不健康糖的消费量更高。这种双重用途的新发现与年轻人的糖摄入量增加有关,这引起了人们对该人群代谢综合征和心血管疾病风险增加的担忧。
    Rates of cannabis initiation among teenagers and young adults are increasing. Further, the use of various forms of cannabis (smoked or vaped) with nicotine (dual use) is increasingly common among young people. The health effects of dual use are lesser known, particularly in the context of high-potency cannabis products and across different routes of administration, which is ominous in terms of predicting future health outcomes. There is a long history of cannabis use being associated with decreased activity and increased snacking, both of which could portend an increased risk of metabolic and cardiovascular disease, particularly when these habits begin during formative years. However, modern forms of cannabis may not have these same effects. Here, we assess whether cannabis use alone and dual use of cannabis with nicotine impact dietary and exercise habits in young people. An anonymous, social media-based survey was designed based on the UC San Diego Inhalant Questionnaire and published diet and exercise questionnaires. A total of 457 surveys were completed. Young sole cannabis users represented 29% of responders, 16% were dual users of cannabis and nicotine, and 55% were non-users of either drug. Although the sole use of cannabis was not associated with dietary or activity differences relative to non-users, dual users of cannabis and nicotine reported higher consumption of unhealthy sugars. This novel finding of dual use being associated with increased sugar intake in young people raises concerns for an increased risk of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着医疗和休闲大麻合法化的增加,患者和提供者对大麻素在治疗炎症性肠病中的作用越来越感兴趣.先前的荟萃分析显示,大麻素的功效尚无定论。我们试图产生最新的荟萃分析,汇集新的数据来评估大麻素在克罗恩病(CD)和溃疡性结肠炎(UC)中的治疗效果。
    方法:PubMed,Embase,对CENTRAL和CINAHL进行了随机对照试验,以评估大麻素对CD或UC的影响。随机效应建模用于计算风险差异的汇总估计。使用I2评估异质性。
    结果:八项研究,包括4项CD研究,3UC的研究,1项两种疾病的研究均符合纳入标准。在5项CD研究中,观察到干预后临床疾病活动有统计学意义的下降(风险比[RR],-0.91;95%CI,CI:1.54toCI:0.28,I2=71.9%)。在汇总分析中,UC的临床疾病活动没有显着降低(RR,-2.13;95%CI,-4.80至0.55;I2=90.3%)。在CD和UC合并中观察到生活质量(QoL)的改善(RR,1.79;95%CI,0.92-0.2.66;I2=82.8%),以及个别。在内镜疾病活动性和炎症标志物的分析中没有观察到差异。
    结论:这项临床试验的荟萃分析表明,大麻素与改善CD和UC患者的生活质量有关。以及改善疾病活动而不是炎症。
    这项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析表明,用于炎症性肠病的大麻可以改善生活质量和疾病活动,但不能改善炎症。
    BACKGROUND: With the increasing legalization of medical and recreational cannabis, patients and providers have growing interest in the role of cannabinoids in treating inflammatory bowel disease. Prior meta-analysis has shown inconclusive evidence for efficacy of cannabinoids. We sought to produce an up-to-date meta-analysis that pools new data to evaluate the therapeutic effects of cannabinoids in both Crohn\'s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).
    METHODS: PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL and CINAHL were queried for randomized-controlled trials evaluating the impact cannabinoids in CD or UC. Random effects modeling was used to compute pooled estimates of risk difference. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2.
    RESULTS: Eight studies, including 4 studies of CD, 3 studies of UC, and 1 study of both diseases met inclusion criteria. Among 5 studies of CD, a statistically significant decrease in clinical disease activity following intervention was observed (risk ratios [RR],  -0.91; 95% CI, CI:1.54 to CI:0.28, I2 = 71.9%). Clinical disease activity in UC was not significantly lower in the pooled analysis (RR, -2.13; 95% CI, -4.80 to 0.55; I2 = 90.3%). Improvement in quality of life (QoL) was observed in both CD and UC combined (RR, 1.79; 95% CI, 0.92-0.2.66; I2 = 82.8%), as well as individually. No differences were observed in the analysis on endoscopic disease activity and inflammatory markers.
    CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of clinical trials suggests that cannabinoids are associated with improved quality of life in both CD and UC, as well as improved disease activity but not inflammation.
    This updated systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that cannabis for inflammatory bowel disease may improve quality of life and disease activity but not inflammation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    二手烟与儿童哮喘症状恶化有关。然而,二手烟与青少年哮喘症状之间的关系尚未研究。这项研究比较了二手烟和大麻烟雾暴露的患病率,总体和哮喘状态,在初中和高中学生中。
    该研究评估了2019-2020年加州学生烟草调查的参与者:第八的横截面随机抽样,第十,和12年级学生(N=158,937)。描述性分析检查了学生哮喘状况和社会人口统计学特征对可燃烟草和大麻二手烟的暴露。
    与没有哮喘的学生相比,更多的哮喘学生暴露于可燃烟草二手烟(13.4%)和大麻二手烟(12.0%),分别)。12年级学生的二手烟暴露率较高(12.2%),而8年级学生(13.4%)和居住在农村地区的学生(15.4%)的二手烟暴露率较高。
    加州学生暴露于大麻二手烟的比例与可燃烟草二手烟相似,更多患有哮喘的学生暴露于大麻二手烟。这些结果通过强调需要检查大麻二手烟,扩大了哮喘儿童中二手烟暴露的公共卫生问题。鉴于美国大麻法律的快速变化,接触二手大麻烟雾可能会增加。因此,弱势群体,比如哮喘儿童,应优先考虑旨在减轻二手大麻暴露的干预措施。
    UNASSIGNED: Secondhand tobacco smoke is associated with worsening asthma symptoms among children. However, the relationship between secondhand marijuana smoke and asthma symptoms among youth has not been examined. This study compares the prevalence of secondhand tobacco and marijuana smoke exposure, overall and by asthma status, among middle and high school students.
    UNASSIGNED: The study assessed participants of the 2019-2020 California Student Tobacco Survey: a large, cross-sectional random sample of 8th, 10th, and 12th graders (N = 158,937). Descriptive analyses examined exposure to combustible tobacco and marijuana secondhand smoke by students\' asthma status and sociodemographic characteristics.
    UNASSIGNED: More students with asthma were exposed to combustible tobacco secondhand smoke (13.4 %) and marijuana secondhand smoke (12.0 %) than students without asthma (10.9 % and 9.3 %, respectively). The prevalence of secondhand marijuana smoke exposure was higher among 12th grade students (12.2 %) while the prevalence of secondhand tobacco smoke exposure was higher among 8th grade students (13.4 %) and those who lived in rural locations (15.4 %).
    UNASSIGNED: California students are exposed to marijuana secondhand smoke at similar proportions to combustible tobacco secondhand smoke and more students with asthma are exposed to marijuana secondhand smoke. These results expand the public health issue of secondhand smoke exposure among children with asthma by highlighting the need to examine marijuana secondhand smoke. Given the rapid shift in marijuana laws across the US, exposure to secondhand marijuana smoke is likely to increase. Therefore, vulnerable populations, such as children with asthma, should be prioritized for interventions that aim to alleviate secondhand marijuana exposure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号