Internet-based intervention

基于互联网的干预
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    从患者的角度公开探索变化和促进变化的定性调查可能会对治疗的影响以及有益和阻碍方面提供有价值的见解。我们这项研究的目的是探索患者对基于互联网的诊断干预的观点,以了解(1)哪些变化(积极和消极的影响)反应者和非反应者经历过,(2)他们认为干预的哪些方面有助于或阻碍了这些变化。在基于统一协议进行为期10周的基于互联网的干预后,我们使用更改访谈时间表采访了21名对治疗有反应或无反应的患者。使用定性内容分析对访谈进行分析。响应者和非响应者都报告了积极的变化,很少提到负面变化。在这两个群体中,增加的积极影响是最常见的报告(81%)。两组都报告了有用的因素,在应答者和非应答者中提及最多的指导(85.7%)。主要是,具体框架的各个方面被认为是阻碍因素(例如缺乏个性化)(66.7%)。总的来说,患者报告大多产生积极影响,即使他们对治疗没有反应。结果强调,患者发现有帮助或有阻碍的是个体。
    Qualitative investigations that openly explore changes and facilitators of changes from the patient\'s perspective might offer valuable insights on impacts of therapy and helpful and hindering aspects. Our aim for this study was to explore the perspective of patients on a transdiagnostic Internet-based intervention to understand (1) which changes (positive as well as negative effects) responders and non-responders experienced, and (2) which aspects of the intervention they found helpful or hindering in facilitating those changes. We interviewed 21 patients that showed response or non-response to treatment using the Change Interview Schedule following a 10-week Internet-based intervention based on the Unified Protocol. Interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Both responders and non-responders reported positive changes, with few negative changes mentioned. Across both groups, increased positive affect was reported most frequently (81%). Both groups reported helpful factors, with guidance mentioned most frequently across both responders and non-responders (85.7%). Mainly, aspects of the specific framework were perceived as hindering (e.g. lack of personalization) (66.7%). Overall, patients reported mostly positive impacts, even if they did not respond to treatment. Results highlighted that what patients find helpful or hindering is individual.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估基于互联网的自助干预措施在治疗青少年和年轻人抑郁症中的有效性。
    方法:在六个数据库中进行了系统搜索,包括PubMed,确定符合特定纳入和排除标准的随机对照试验(RCT)。干预措施包括基于互联网的自助干预措施。
    结果:本分析共纳入23项随机对照试验(RCT)。荟萃分析表明,基于互联网的自助疗法显着降低了青少年和年轻人的抑郁评分。(OR=-0.68,95CI[-0.88,-0.47],P<0.001)。我们检查了来自不同地区的患者招募的影响,药物使用,治疗师参与,每周干预时间,和干预持续时间。从学校挑选的病人,初级保健中心,诊所和当地社区的效果更好。短期持续30至60分钟和每周60至180分钟的干预有效。
    结论:基于网络的自助干预可以有效治疗青少年和年轻人的抑郁症。然而,患者招募地点等因素,药物使用,治疗师的参与,每周干预时间,干预持续时间与结果相互作用。由于纳入研究的数据不足,无法对潜在不良反应和性别进行亚组分析。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of Internet-based self-help interventions in treating depression in adolescents and young adults.
    METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across six databases, including PubMed, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that satisfied the specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. The intervention measure consisted of Internet-based self-help interventions.
    RESULTS: A total of 23 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this analysis. Meta-analysis indicated that Internet-based self-help therapies significantly reduced depression scores in adolescents and young adults. (OR = -0.68, 95%CI [-0.88, -0.47], P < 0.001). We examined the effects of patient recruitment from various regions, medication usage, therapist involvement, weekly intervention time, and intervention duration. Patients selected from school, primary healthcare centers, clinics and local communities had better results. Intervention lasting 30 to 60 min and 60 to180 minutes per week were effective in the short term.
    CONCLUSIONS: The internet-based self-help intervention can be effective in treating depression in adolescents and young adults. However, factors such as patient recruitment locations, medication usage, Therapists\' involvement, weekly intervention time, and intervention duration interacted with the outcome. Subgroup analysis on potential adverse effects and gender was impossible due to insufficient data from the included studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    每个月,大约3800人在荷兰自杀预防求助热线的网站上完成了自杀想法的匿名自我测试。尽管70%的人在自杀念头的严重程度上得分很高,<10%导航到有关联系帮助热线的网页。
    这项研究旨在测试简短的减少障碍干预(BRI)在激励有严重自杀念头的人联系预防自杀求助热线方面的有效性,特别是男性和中年人等高危人群。
    我们进行了全自动,基于网络的,随机对照试验。有严重自杀想法和很少联系求助热线的受访者被随机分配到简短的BRI,他们收到了一个简短的,根据他们自我报告的求助热线屏障量身定制的信息(n=610),或一般咨询文本(照常护理对照组:n=612)。使用行为和态度测量来评估有效性。主要结果指标是在完成干预或控制条件后使用直接链接联系求助热线。次要结果是自我报告的联系求助热线的可能性以及对接受的自我测试的满意度。
    总共,2124名网站访问者完成了自杀意念属性量表和条目筛选问卷中的人口统计问题。其中,1222人随机分为干预组和对照组。最终,772名受访者完成了随机对照试验(干预组:n=369;对照组:n=403)。两组中选择最多的障碍是“我认为我的问题不够严重。“在审判结束时,在干预组中,有33.1%(n=122)的受访者使用了与求助热线的直接链接。这与对照组的受访者没有显着差异(144/403,35.7%;比值比0.87,95%CI0.64-1.18,P=.38)。然而,接受BRI的受访者在自我报告的稍后时间点联系求助热线的可能性(B=0.22,95%CI0.12-0.32,P≤.001)和对自我测试的满意度(B=0.27,95%CI0.01-0.53,P=.04)方面得分较高.特别是对于男性和中年受访者,结果与全组相当.
    该试验是求助热线首次能够与不愿联系求助热线的高风险网站访问者联系。尽管BRI无法确保这些受访者在审判结束时立即使用与求助热线的直接链接,令人鼓舞的是,受访者表示他们更有可能在稍后的时间点联系求助热线。此外,这种低成本的干预措施使人们对所感知的服务障碍有了更深入的了解。后续研究应侧重于确定其他组件的附加值(例如,视频或照片材料)在BRI中,并提高其有效性,尤其是男性和中年人。
    UNASSIGNED: Every month, around 3800 people complete an anonymous self-test for suicidal thoughts on the website of the Dutch suicide prevention helpline. Although 70% score high on the severity of suicidal thoughts, <10% navigate to the web page about contacting the helpline.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to test the effectiveness of a brief barrier reduction intervention (BRI) in motivating people with severe suicidal thoughts to contact the suicide prevention helpline, specifically in high-risk groups such as men and middle-aged people.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a fully automated, web-based, randomized controlled trial. Respondents with severe suicidal thoughts and little motivation to contact the helpline were randomly allocated either to a brief BRI, in which they received a short, tailored message based on their self-reported barrier to the helpline (n=610), or a general advisory text (care as usual as the control group: n=612). Effectiveness was evaluated using both behavioral and attitudinal measurements. The primary outcome measure was the use of a direct link to contact the helpline after completing the intervention or control condition. Secondary outcomes were the self-reported likelihood of contacting the helpline and satisfaction with the received self-test.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 2124 website visitors completed the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale and the demographic questions in the entry screening questionnaire. Among them, 1222 were randomized into the intervention or control group. Eventually, 772 respondents completed the randomized controlled trial (intervention group: n=369; control group: n=403). The most selected barrier in both groups was \"I don\'t think that my problems are serious enough.\" At the end of the trial, 33.1% (n=122) of the respondents in the intervention group used the direct link to the helpline. This was not significantly different from the respondents in the control group (144/403, 35.7%; odds ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.64-1.18, P=.38). However, the respondents who received the BRI did score higher on their self-reported likelihood of contacting the helpline at a later point in time (B=0.22, 95% CI 0.12-0.32, P≤.001) and on satisfaction with the self-test (B=0.27, 95% CI 0.01-0.53, P=.04). For male and middle-aged respondents specifically, the results were comparable to that of the whole group.
    UNASSIGNED: This trial was the first time the helpline was able to connect with high-risk website visitors who were hesitant to contact the helpline. Although the BRI could not ensure that those respondents immediately used the direct link to the helpline at the end of the trial, it is encouraging that respondents indicated that they were more likely to contact the helpline at a later point in time. In addition, this low-cost intervention provided greater insight into the perceived barriers to service. Follow-up research should be focused on identifying the added value of other components (eg, video or photo material) in the BRI and increasing its effectiveness, especially for men and middle-aged people.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    数字干预措施可以有效预防和治疗大学生的常见心理健康状况。在这些计划的设计和实施中结合学生的经验和观点可以提高吸收和参与度。这项定性研究探索了大学生对低强度基于视频的心理健康干预的观点,他们在大学环境中实施该计划的建议,以及他们解决参与障碍的观点和建议。
    参与者(N=115)是学生(平均值=20.63岁,SD=2.10),从UniVirtualClinic-Lite(UVC-Lite)的随机对照试验中得出的来自31所澳大利亚大学的痛苦升高。通过半结构化访谈(n=12)和干预后调查中的开放式问题(n=103)收集随机分配到干预条件的学生的数据。使用内容分析对数据进行分析。
    参与者普遍报告对干预的积极看法,大多数人认为它应该作为一种普遍的干预措施提供给学生。提出了多种传播干预措施的方法,包括通过大学咨询,官方平台(如学生支持服务)和非正式渠道(如口碑推广)。很难将节目融入日常生活,对心理健康和技术相关因素的预先存在的信念被强调为参与的障碍.
    基于视频的低强度心理健康干预通常被认为是可以接受的,适用于轻度至中度困扰的学生。参与者提供了一些建议,以鼓励采取干预措施以及向学生传播干预措施的可能途径。这些的有效性应在未来的试验中进行检查。
    UNASSIGNED: Digital interventions can be effective in preventing and treating common mental health conditions among university students. Incorporating student experiences and perspectives in the design and implementation of these programmes may improve uptake and engagement. This qualitative study explored university students\' perspectives of a low-intensity video-based mental health intervention, their recommendations for implementing the programme in university settings, and their views and recommendations to address barriers to engagement.
    UNASSIGNED: Participants (N = 115) were students (mean = 20.63 years, SD = 2.10) with elevated distress from 31 Australian universities drawn from a randomised controlled trial of the Uni Virtual Clinic-Lite (UVC-Lite). Data from students randomised to the intervention condition were collected via semi-structured interviews (n = 12) and open-ended questions during post-intervention surveys (n = 103). Data were analysed using content analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Participants generally reported positive views of the intervention, and most felt it should be offered to students as a universal intervention. Multiple methods of disseminating the intervention were suggested, including through university counselling, official platforms (e.g. student support services) and informal channels (e.g. word-of-mouth promotion). Difficulty integrating the programme into everyday life, pre-existing beliefs about mental health and technology-related factors were highlighted as barriers to engagement.
    UNASSIGNED: A low-intensity video-based mental health intervention was generally considered to be acceptable and appropriate for students with mild to moderate distress. Participants provided several suggestions to encourage uptake of the intervention and possible pathways to disseminate the intervention to students. The effectiveness of these should be examined in future trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:叙利亚的战争使680多万人流离失所,比第二次世界大战以来的任何其他冲突都要多。因此,叙利亚寻求庇护者和难民经历了几次改变生活的事件,导致高焦虑率,抑郁症,创伤后应激障碍,自杀意念(SI)。解决待遇差距,减轻求助负担,为一般人群制定的减少SI的网络干预措施在文化上适用于英国的叙利亚寻求庇护者和难民。研究表明,了解他们的迁徙经历和适应过程在为SI提供治疗方面的重要性。这项研究现在将评估针对该人群的文化适应干预措施的可行性和可接受性。
    目的:研究的第一阶段将包括招募参与者并提供基于网络的干预措施(1)评估实现招募目标和招募率的可行性,以及(2)评估结果措施的可行性。研究的第二阶段将包括一对一的半结构化访谈(1),以评估文化适应的干预措施在招聘和遵守率以及参与的障碍和促进者方面的适用性,以及(2)评估干预措施的可接受性在文化相关性和适当性方面。
    方法:这是一个单组协议,非控制,混合方法的可行性和可接受性研究文化适应的基于网络的干预措施,以减少在英国的叙利亚寻求庇护者和难民的SI。研究将评估招聘目标的可行性,招聘率,坚持率,和使用个体参与者跟踪表格的结果测量,将进行定量分析。将通过对12名完成干预的参与者进行一对一的半结构化访谈来评估干预措施的适用性和可接受性。将进行定性分析。
    结果:招募于2024年2月开始,将持续到30名参与者被招募参加研究或直到2024年7月底。到目前为止,19名参与者提供了知情同意书,16人符合条件并注册,12人完成了干预后的采访。尚未分析任何数据。这项研究,包括撰写期,预计将于2024年12月结束。
    结论:尽管经历了一些与被迫流离失所和心理健康问题高发有关的压力源,在英国的叙利亚寻求庇护者和难民获得治疗的机会仍然有限。解决待遇差距,减轻求助负担,与英国的叙利亚寻求庇护者和难民合作,在文化上调整了基于网络的干预措施,以减少SI。这项研究现在将评估干预措施和文化上适当的招聘策略的可行性和可接受性。
    背景:ISRCTNISRCTN11417025;https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN11417025.
    PRR1-10.2196/56957。
    BACKGROUND: The war in Syria has displaced over 6.8 million people, more than any other conflict since the Second World War. As a result, Syrian asylum seekers and refugees have experienced several life-changing events, resulting in high rates of anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, and suicidal ideation (SI). To address the treatment gap and reduce the burden of help-seeking, a web-based intervention to reduce SI developed for general populations was culturally adapted for and with Syrian asylum seekers and refugees in the United Kingdom. The study revealed the importance of understanding their lived experience with migration and the acculturative process in providing treatment for SI. This study will now assess the feasibility and acceptability of the culturally adapted intervention for this population.
    OBJECTIVE: The first phase of the study will include recruiting participants and delivering the web-based intervention (1) to assess the feasibility of meeting recruitment goals and recruitment rates and (2) to assess the feasibility of outcome measures. The second phase of the study will include one-to-one semistructured interviews (1) to assess the suitability of the culturally adapted intervention in terms of recruitment and adherence rates and barriers and facilitators to engagement and (2) to assess the acceptability of the intervention in terms of its cultural relevance and appropriateness.
    METHODS: This is a protocol for a single-group, noncontrolled, mixed methods feasibility and acceptability study of a culturally adapted web-based intervention to reduce SI for Syrian asylum seekers and refugees in the United Kingdom. The study will assess the feasibility of recruitment goals, recruitment rates, adherence rates, and outcome measures using individual participant tracking forms, which will be analyzed quantitatively. The suitability and acceptability of the intervention will be assessed using one-to-one semistructured interviews with 12 participants who completed the intervention, which will be analyzed qualitatively.
    RESULTS: Recruitment began in February 2024 and will run until 30 participants are recruited to the study or until the end of July 2024. Thus far, 19 participants have provided informed consent, 16 were eligible and enrolled, and 12 have completed a postintervention interview. No data have been analyzed. The study, including the write-up period, is expected to end in December 2024.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite experiencing several stressors related to forced displacement and high rates of mental health issues, access to treatment is still limited for Syrian asylum seekers and refugees in the United Kingdom. To address the treatment gap and reduce the burden of help-seeking, a web-based intervention to reduce SI was culturally adapted in collaboration with Syrian asylum seekers and refugees in the United Kingdom. This study will now assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and culturally appropriate recruitment strategies.
    BACKGROUND: ISRCTN ISRCTN11417025; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN11417025.
    UNASSIGNED: PRR1-10.2196/56957.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    全球人口中的心理健康素养(MHL)差极大地导致了与精神障碍相关的治疗差距。在数字时代,利用基于互联网的MHL干预措施提供了可扩展性和更广泛的可访问性。这项荟萃分析旨在评估基于互联网的干预措施在改善MHL和心理健康方面的效果。
    截至2024年2月,在七个数据库中搜索了基于互联网的MHL干预措施(知识,污名,寻求帮助的态度和意图)和精神障碍(一般痛苦,焦虑,和抑郁症状)。在干预后和长期随访评估中进行随机效应荟萃分析。
    纳入了29项符合条件的研究,涉及11,582名参与者。在各个领域观察到显着的积极影响:知识增加(立即:g=0.459,95CI:0.285至0.634;随访:g=0.487,95CI:0.348至0.626),立即减少柱头(g=-0.332,95CI:-0.479至-0.186),立即增强寻求帮助的态度(g=0.168,95CI:0.046至0.3291)和寻求帮助的意图(g=0.135,95CI:0.072至0.198),以及立即改善心理健康(g=-0.074,95CI:-0.115至-0.033)。
    总的来说,这些发现强调了基于互联网的干预措施在改善MHL和心理健康方面的积极作用,虽然随着时间的推移保持这些影响仍然具有挑战性,特别是在减少污名和促进长期寻求帮助的行为。解决方法上的局限性,采用更具互动性的方法,和实施有针对性的干预措施对于最大限度地提高有效性和在全球范围内推进精神卫生保健至关重要。
    UNASSIGNED: Poor mental health literacy (MHL) in the global population significantly contributes to the treatment gap associated with mental disorders. In the digital age, leveraging Internet-based MHL interventions offers scalability and broader accessibility. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of Internet-based interventions in improving MHL and mental health.
    UNASSIGNED: Up to Feb 2024, seven databases were searched for Internet-based interventions on MHL (knowledge, stigma, help-seeking attitudes and intentions) and mental disorders (general distress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms). The random-effects meta-analyses at post-intervention and long-term follow-up assessments were performed.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-nine eligible studies involving 11,582 participants were included. Significant positive effects were observed across various domains: knowledge increase (immediate: g = 0.459, 95 %CI: 0.285 to 0.634; follow-up: g = 0.487, 95 %CI: 0.348 to 0.626), immediate stigma reduction (g = -0.332, 95 %CI: -0.479 to -0.186), immediate enhancement of help-seeking attitudes (g = 0.168, 95 %CI: 0.046 to 0.3291) and help-seeking intentions (g = 0.135, 95 %CI: 0.072 to 0.198), as well as immediate mental health improvements (g = -0.074, 95 %CI: -0.115 to -0.033).
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, these findings underscore the promising effects of internet-based interventions in improving MHL and mental health, while maintaining these effects over time remains challenging, particularly in reducing stigma and promoting long-term help-seeking behaviors. Addressing methodological limitations, adopting a more interactive approach, and implementing targeted interventions are crucial to maximizing the effectiveness and advancing mental health care worldwide.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:在全球范围内,15-24岁的女性遭受性暴力伤害的风险更高,不良精神的危险因素,物理,和行为健康结果。性暴力在大学很常见,最常见的是男性,然而,在低收入和中等收入国家,针对男性的循证预防策略很少得到检验.GlobalConsent是一个六模块,基于网络的教育计划改编自有效的美国计划。在越南的一项随机试验中,治疗后9个月,与注意力控制相比,GlobalConsent降低了男性的性暴力行为(比值比[OR]=0.71,95CI0.50-1.00),并增加了亲社会干预行为(OR=1.51,1.00-2.28)。需要有关扩大规模的最佳实施策略的证据。
    方法:我们将随机分配北部的六所医科大学,中央,和南越使用两种不同的实施策略包提供全球同意。更高强度的战略将包括(1)与大学领导和教职员工的实施前和实施后接触,以及(2)更大的实施前外展,后续行动,以及激励学生促进参与和完成全球同意。强度较高的大学将获得额外的培训和支持,以支持其增加的活动。我们将比较实施驱动因素和结果,干预效果,以及两个实施包的成本效益。我们的混合方法比较中断时间序列设计包括(1)与大学领导者和实施团队进行定性访谈和定量调查,以评估实施障碍和促进者;(2)与领导者和教职员工进行重复调查,实施团队,和男学生评估多层次的实施驱动因素和结果;(3)与男学生重复调查,以评估行为结果(性暴力和干预行为)和中介变量(知识,态度,影响,和能力);和(4)时间日记和成本跟踪,以评估两个实施战略捆绑包的成本效益。
    结论:该项目是第一个评估一揽子实施策略的项目,旨在为越南所有地区的本科生提供有效的基于网络的性暴力预防计划,并与暴力预防培训计划(D43TW012188)。这种方法将为如何在全国范围内传播全球同意提供严格的证据,随着全球同意的扩大,这有望减少与性暴力相关的基于性别的健康不平等。
    背景:NCT06443541。在ClinicalTrials.gov上回顾性注册2024年6月5日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Globally, women 15-24 years are at heightened risk of sexual violence victimization, a risk factor for adverse mental, physical, and behavioral health outcomes. Sexual violence is common at universities and most often perpetrated by men, yet few evidence-based prevention strategies targeting men have been tested in low- and middle-income countries. GlobalConsent is a six-module, web-based educational program adapted from an efficacious U.S.-based program. Nine months post-treatment in a randomized trial in Vietnam, GlobalConsent reduced men\'s sexually violent behavior (odds ratio [OR] = 0.71, 95%CI 0.50-1.00) and increased prosocial intervening behavior (OR = 1.51, 1.00-2.28) relative to an attention-control. Evidence regarding optimal implementation strategies for scale up is needed.
    METHODS: We will randomize six medical universities in North, Central, and South Vietnam to deliver GlobalConsent using two different packages of implementation strategies that vary in intensity. Higher-intensity strategies will include greater (1) pre- and post-implementation engagement with university leaders and faculty and (2) greater pre-implementation outreach, follow-up, and incentives for students to promote engagement and completion of GlobalConsent. Higher intensity universities will receive additional training and support for their added activities. We will compare implementation drivers and outcomes, intervention effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness across the two implementation bundles. Our mixed-methods comparative interrupted time series design includes (1) qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys with university leaders and implementation teams to assess implementation barriers and facilitators; (2) repeated surveys with leaders and faculty, implementation teams, and male students to assess multilevel implementation drivers and outcomes; (3) repeated surveys with male students to assess behavioral outcomes (sexual violence and intervening behavior) and mediating variables (knowledge, attitudes, affect, and capacities); and (4) time diaries and cost tracking to assess cost-effectiveness of the two implementation-strategies bundles.
    CONCLUSIONS: This project is the first to assess packages of implementation strategies to deliver an efficacious web-based sexual violence prevention program for undergraduate men across all regions of Vietnam and synergizes with a violence-prevention training initiative (D43TW012188). This approach will produce rigorous evidence about how to disseminate GlobalConsent nationally, which holds promise to reduce gender-based health inequities linked to sexual violence as GlobalConsent is brought to scale.
    BACKGROUND: NCT06443541. Retrospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov. Registered on June 05, 2024.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:与患有酒精使用障碍(AUD)的伴侣一起生活的人比没有患有AUD的伴侣的人可能会经历严重的心理困扰并更多地使用医疗保健。然而,目前的治疗系统对伴侣和个人障碍的关注限制了这些人自己获得帮助。关于自我指导的初步工作,基于网络的应对技能培训计划,停止旋转我的车轮(SSMW),在扩大这一人群的可用治疗方面显示出希望。在这项研究中,我们对SSMW主要结局进行了稳健评估.
    目的:该研究旨在测试是否有伴侣AUD分配给SSMW的女性在负面影响(抑郁和愤怒)方面的减少(1)比通常的网络护理(UWC)控制和(2)有简短的电话教练支持(SSMW教练)而不是没有(仅SSMW),以及(3)基线负面影响是否影响适度的治疗效果。
    方法:女性(平均年龄45.7,SD10.8岁;黑人:17/456,3.7%;白人:408/456,89.5%)仅随机分为SSMW,SSMW+教练,或UWC。在基线时评估抑郁(贝克抑郁量表-II)和愤怒(状态特征愤怒表达量表2-状态愤怒),12周后测,以及6个月和12个月的随访。
    结果:所有情况下的参与者从基线到测后,从基线到随访,抑郁都有所下降;仅SSMW和SSMW+教练参与者的愤怒有所下降,但UWC参与者没有。与UWC参与者相比,仅SSMW的参与者经历了更大的愤怒减少(P=0.03),和SSMW+教练参与者经历了更大的抑郁症(P<.001)从基线到后测。然而,从基线到随访,只有更大的,但无统计学意义(P=.052),与UWC相比,SSMW+教练的愤怒减少。尽管SSMW条件在负面影响结果方面没有差异(P=.06-.57),SSMW+教练有更高的项目参与度和满意度(所有P<.004)。基线负面影响并没有缓和影响,尽管基线临床相关抑郁症状的缓解(贝克抑郁量表≥14)仅在SSMW(33/67,49%;比值比2.13,95%CI1.05-4.30;P=.03)和SSMW+教练(46/74,62%;比值比3.60,95%CI1.79-7.23;P<.001)高于UMW(21WC/67,31%);
    结论:结果部分支持假设。SSMW条件比UWC有更早的影响,但是UWC的积极变化减轻了假设的长期SSMW-UWC差异。结果突出了在基于网络的临床试验中纳入主动对照的重要性。尽管SSMW+教练仅在参与和满意度措施以及需要治疗的数量上显示出优于SSMW的优势(仅SSMW为5.6;SSMW+教练为3.2),在抑郁症状缓解水平上,SSMW条件与UWC相当且优于UWC。总的来说,有或没有教练的SSMW可以减少临床上有意义的痛苦,并为这个大的,服务不足的群体。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT02984241;https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/研究/NCT02984241。
    BACKGROUND: Individuals living with a partner with an alcohol use disorder (AUD) can experience significant psychological distress and use health care more than those without a partner with an AUD. However, the prevailing treatment system\'s focus on the partner and personal barriers limit these individuals from getting help for themselves. Preliminary work on a self-directed, web-based coping skills training program, Stop Spinning My Wheels (SSMW), shows promise in broadening available treatments for this population. In this study, we conducted a robust evaluation of SSMW primary outcomes.
    OBJECTIVE: The study aims to test whether women with a partner with an AUD assigned to SSMW experienced a greater reduction in negative affect (depression and anger) (1) than a usual web care (UWC) control and (2) with brief phone coach support (SSMW+coach) rather than without (SSMW only) and (3) whether baseline negative affect moderated treatment effects.
    METHODS: Women (mean age 45.7, SD 10.8 years; Black: 17/456, 3.7%; White: 408/456, 89.5%) were randomized to SSMW only, SSMW+coach, or UWC. Depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II) and anger (State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory 2-State Anger) were assessed at baseline, 12-week posttest, and 6- and 12-month follow-ups.
    RESULTS: Participants in all conditions decreased in depression from baseline to posttest and from baseline to follow-up; SSMW-only and SSMW+coach participants decreased in anger, but UWC participants did not. Compared to UWC participants, SSMW-only participants experienced greater anger reduction (P=.03), and SSMW+coach participants experienced a greater reduction in depression (P<.001) from baseline to posttest. However, from baseline to follow-up, only a greater, but not statistically significant (P=.052), reduction in anger occurred in SSMW+coach compared to UWC. Although the SSMW conditions did not differ from each other in negative affect outcomes (P=.06-.57), SSMW+coach had higher program engagement and satisfaction (all P<.004). Baseline negative affect did not moderate effects, although remission from baseline clinically relevant depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory≥14) was higher in SSMW only (33/67, 49%; odds ratio 2.13, 95% CI 1.05-4.30; P=.03) and SSMW+coach (46/74, 62%; odds ratio 3.60, 95% CI 1.79-7.23; P<.001) than in UWC (21/67, 31%); remission rates did not differ between the SSMW conditions (P=.12).
    CONCLUSIONS: The results partially supported the hypotheses. The SSMW conditions had earlier effects than UWC, but positive change in UWC mitigated the hypothesized long-term SSMW-UWC differences. The results highlight the importance of incorporating active controls in web-based clinical trials. Although SSMW+coach showed benefits over SSMW only on engagement and satisfaction measures and in the number needed to treat (5.6 for SSMW only; 3.2 for SSMW+coach), the SSMW conditions were comparable and superior to UWC on depressive symptom remission levels. Overall, SSMW with or without a coach can reduce clinically meaningful distress and add to available treatment options for this large, underserved group.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02984241; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02984241.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    饮食行为失调,包括亚阈值和临床暴食症(BED)和神经性贪食症(BN),在普通人群中正在增加,从而对一个人的健康和福祉产生负面影响。尽管这些结果很严重,患有BED和BN的人通常会延迟接受诊断或治疗,通常是由于难以获得护理。因此,需要对饮食症状进行基于证据和可持续的干预.本研究旨在评估基于BED和BN的辩证行为疗法(DBT)的基于网络的10次多学科小组干预的有效性,旨在减少饮食行为失调患者的心理困扰和与暴饮暴食相关的症状,并包括一次营养治疗教育。共有65名参与者(84.6%F;年龄M=38.5±13.2;实验组,N=43;照常治疗组,TAU,N=22)参加了这项研究。结果显示,在每周九次会议之后,与照常治疗组相比,实验组与暴饮暴食相关的症状学和一般精神病理学显着降低,在社会环境中自尊和饮食自我效能感增加(T0vs.T1).在暴饮暴食症状方面,从干预结束(T2)一个月后,实验组的改善显着维持,一般精神病理学,在社会环境中吃自我效能感。这项研究支持了简短的基于网络的多学科小组干预在减少饮食症状和心理困扰以及增强饮食行为失调的人群中的自尊和饮食自我效能感方面的有效性。简短的基于网络的干预措施可以代表可访问和可持续的资源,以解决公共临床环境中与暴食相关的症状。
    Dysregulated eating behaviors, comprising subthreshold and clinical binge-eating disorder (BED) and bulimia nervosa (BN), are increasing among the general population, with a consequent negative impact on one\'s health and well-being. Despite the severity of these outcomes, people with BED and BN often face a delay in receiving a diagnosis or treatment, often due to difficulties in accessing care. Hence, evidence-based and sustainable interventions for eating symptomatology are needed. The present study aims to assess the effectiveness of a web-based 10-session multidisciplinary group intervention based on Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) for BED and BN, aimed at reducing psychological distress and binge-eating-related symptomatology in a sample of patients with dysregulated eating behaviors and including one session of nutritional therapeutic education. A total of 65 participants (84.6% F; age M = 38.5 ± 13.2; experimental group, N = 43; treatment-as-usual group, TAU, N = 22) took part in the study. The results show, after the 9 weekly sessions, a significant reduction in binge-eating-related symptomatology and general psychopathology and an increased self-esteem and eating self-efficacy in social contexts in the experimental group compared to the treatment-as-usual group (T0 vs. T1). Improvements in the experimental group were significantly maintained after one month from the end of the intervention (T2) in terms of binge-eating symptoms, general psychopathology, and eating self-efficacy in social contexts. This study supports the effectiveness of a brief web-based multidisciplinary group intervention in reducing eating symptomatology and psychological distress and enhancing self-esteem and eating self-efficacy in a group of people with dysregulated eating behaviors. Brief web-based interventions could represent an accessible and sustainable resource to address binge-eating-related symptomatology in public clinical settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Study
    自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童的照顾者经常报告更高水平的压力和心理健康问题。支持服务和家长培训计划可能有助于缓冲照顾ASD儿童的影响。然而,由于全国缺乏训练有素的ASD提供者和农村地区ASD支持资源的差距,看护者往往得不到支持。联系农村地区护理人员的一个可能的解决方案是基于网络的干预措施。本文描述了一项正在进行的试点研究,研究了可行性,可接受性,以及针对农村地区自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)幼儿(2-11岁)的基于网络的家长培训计划(AttendBehavior)对照顾者幸福感和破坏性儿童行为的初步影响(试验注册NCT05554198)。干预措施可在互联网上以及可下载的手机应用程序上使用。参与者将被邀请使用干预计划12周。在使用该程序之前,参与者将被要求进行评估抑郁症状的基线调查(PROMIS抑郁简表-6a),照顾者压力(育儿压力指数-简表),儿童破坏性行为(家庭情况问卷-ASD和异常行为清单)。12周后,参与者将被要求以相同的测量量表完成干预后调查,以及有关干预可接受性的问题,适当性,和可行性(干预的可接受性,干预适当性措施,以及干预措施的可行性)。还邀请参与者参加与研究小组成员的简短1:1访谈,以提供有关干预的进一步反馈。将检查研究保留和参与者应用程序使用数据。从这项初步研究中产生的信息将用于为未来更大规模的参与行为随机对照试验提供信息。
    Caregivers of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often report higher levels of stress and mental health issues. Support services and parent training programs may help buffer the effects of caring for a child with ASD. However, due to the national lack of trained ASD providers and disparity of ASD support resources available in rural areas, caregivers often go without support. A possible solution to reach caregivers in rural areas is web-based interventions. This paper describes an ongoing pilot study examining the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects on caregiver well-being and disruptive child behaviors for a web-based parent training program (Attend Behavior) for caregivers of young children (ages 2-11 years old) with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) living in rural areas (trial registration NCT05554198). The intervention is available on the internet as well as a downloadable app for mobile phones. Participants will be invited to use the intervention program for 12-weeks. Prior to using the program, participants will be asked to take a baseline survey assessing depressive symptoms (PROMIS Depression Short Form-6a), caregiver stress (Parenting Stress Index-Short Form), child disruptive behaviors (Home Situations Questionnaire-ASD and Aberrant Behavior Checklist). After 12-weeks, participants will be asked to complete a post-intervention survey with the same measurement scales plus questions regarding intervention acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility (Acceptability of Intervention, Intervention Appropriateness Measure, and the Feasibility of Intervention Measure). Participants are also invited to partake in a brief 1:1 interview with a study team member to give further feedback regarding the intervention. Study retention and participant app usage data will be examined. Information generated from this pilot study will be used to inform a future larger scale randomized control trial of Attend Behavior.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号