UNASSIGNED: Infantile café au lait spot is a brown macule with various sizes (diameter: 0.5 cm-30 cm). Infantile giant café au lait spot (IGCALS) is a huge (diameter >20cm) irregular-shaped benign hyperpigmented skin disorder that arises in infants. There has been no clearly established laser treatment consensus for the treatment of IGCALS because infants are too fragile to receive laser treatment with long hours and broad areas along with the possibility of undesirable cosmetic results.
UNASSIGNED: This study investigated the safety and efficacy of Golden Parameter Therapy (GPT) using a high fluence 1064-nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (QSNL) for IGCALS treatment.
UNASSIGNED: This study included 24 Korean patients with IGCALS. Twenty-one patients who were treated with a 1064-nm QSNL weekly for 30-50 treatment sessions with GPT. The parameters included a spot size of 7 mm, a fluence of 2.2 J/cm2 and a pulse rate of 10 Hz with one pass using a sliding-stacking technique over the IGCALS. In control group, three patients were treated with a 532-nm picosecond laser monthly for three treatment sessions with a spot size of 3 mm, a fluence of 1 J/cm2 and a pulse rate of 2 Hz.
UNASSIGNED: After the last treatment, 21 patients with IGCALS reached the complete removal of pigmented lesions, which can be considered optimal cosmetic results without any side effects such as purpura, crust, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, iatrogenic punctate leukoderma, and scarring. There are no recurrences in any patients after 6-21 months\' follow-up, but treatment failure occurred in three patients who were treated with 532 nm picosecond laser.
UNASSIGNED: Convincingly, we argue that early intervention before 12 months of age with GPT using a high fluence 1064 nm QSNL is a safe, applicable and effective treatment for IGCALS, minimizing side effects without any recurrences.

The social and behavioral sciences have been increasingly using automated text analysis to measure psychological constructs in text. We explore whether GPT, the large-language model (LLM) underlying the AI chatbot ChatGPT, can be used as a tool for automated psychological text analysis in several languages. Across 15 datasets (n = 47,925 manually annotated tweets and news headlines), we tested whether different versions of GPT (3.5 Turbo, 4, and 4 Turbo) can accurately detect psychological constructs (sentiment, discrete emotions, offensiveness, and moral foundations) across 12 languages. We found that GPT (r = 0.59 to 0.77) performed much better than English-language dictionary analysis (r = 0.20 to 0.30) at detecting psychological constructs as judged by manual annotators. GPT performed nearly as well as, and sometimes better than, several top-performing fine-tuned machine learning models. Moreover, GPT\'s performance improved across successive versions of the model, particularly for lesser-spoken languages, and became less expensive. Overall, GPT may be superior to many existing methods of automated text analysis, since it achieves relatively high accuracy across many languages, requires no training data, and is easy to use with simple prompts (e.g., \"is this text negative?\") and little coding experience. We provide sample code and a video tutorial for analyzing text with the GPT application programming interface. We argue that GPT and other LLMs help democratize automated text analysis by making advanced natural language processing capabilities more accessible, and may help facilitate more cross-linguistic research with understudied languages.

To evaluate the response capabilities, in a public healthcare system otolaryngology job competition examination, of ChatGPT 3.5 and an internet-connected GPT-4 engine (Microsoft Copilot) with the real scores of otolaryngology specialists as the control group. In September 2023, 135 questions divided into theoretical and practical parts were input into ChatGPT 3.5 and an internet-connected GPT-4. The accuracy of AI responses was compared with the official results from otolaryngologists who took the exam, and statistical analysis was conducted using Stata 14.2. Copilot (GPT-4) outperformed ChatGPT 3.5. Copilot achieved a score of 88.5 points, while ChatGPT scored 60 points. Both AIs had discrepancies in their incorrect answers. Despite ChatGPT\'s proficiency, Copilot displayed superior performance, ranking as the second-best score among the 108 otolaryngologists who took the exam, while ChatGPT was placed 83rd. A chat powered by GPT-4 with internet access (Copilot) demonstrates superior performance in responding to multiple-choice medical questions compared to ChatGPT 3.5.

The availability of data from profiling of cancer patients with multiomics is rapidly increasing. However, integrative analysis of such data for personalized target identification is not trivial. Multiomics2Targets is a platform that enables users to upload transcriptomics, proteomics, and phosphoproteomics data matrices collected from the same cohort of cancer patients. After uploading the data, Multiomics2Targets produces a report that resembles a research publication. The uploaded matrices are processed, analyzed, and visualized using the tools Enrichr, KEA3, ChEA3, Expression2Kinases, and TargetRanger to identify and prioritize proteins, genes, and transcripts as potential targets. Figures and tables, as well as descriptions of the methods and results, are automatically generated. Reports include an abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, conclusions, and references and are exportable as citable PDFs and Jupyter Notebooks. Multiomics2Targets is applied to analyze version 3 of the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC3) pan-cancer cohort, identifying potential targets for each CPTAC3 cancer subtype. Multiomics2Targets is available from https://multiomics2targets.maayanlab.cloud/.

OBJECTIVE: To develop an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based anomaly detection model as a complement of an \"astute physician\" in detecting novel disease cases in a hospital and preventing emerging outbreaks.
METHODS: Data included hospitalized patients (n = 120,714) at a safety-net hospital in Massachusetts. A novel Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT)-based clinical anomaly detection system was designed and further trained using Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM), which can model a hospitalized patient\'s Electronic Health Records (EHR) and detect atypical patients. Methods and performance metrics, similar to the ones behind the recent Large Language Models (LLMs), were leveraged to capture the dynamic evolution of the patient\'s clinical variables and compute an Out-Of-Distribution (OOD) anomaly score.
RESULTS: In a completely unsupervised setting, hospitalizations for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection could have been predicted by our GPT model at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, with an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) of 92.2 %, using 31 extracted clinical variables and a 3-day detection window. Our GPT achieves individual patient-level anomaly detection and mortality prediction AUC of 78.3 % and 94.7 %, outperforming traditional linear models by 6.6 % and 9 %, respectively. Different types of clinical trajectories of a SARS-CoV-2 infection are captured by our model to make interpretable detections, while a trend of over-pessimistic outcome prediction yields a more effective detection pathway. Furthermore, our comprehensive GPT model can potentially assist clinicians with forecasting patient clinical variables and developing personalized treatment plans.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that an emerging outbreak can be accurately detected within a hospital, by using a GPT to model patient EHR time sequences and labeling them as anomalous when actual outcomes are not supported by the model. Such a GPT is also a comprehensive model with the functionality of generating future patient clinical variables, which can potentially assist clinicians in developing personalized treatment plans.

Demographics, social determinants of health, and family history documented in the unstructured text within the electronic health records are increasingly being studied to understand how this information can be utilized with the structured data to improve healthcare outcomes. After the GPT models were released, many studies have applied GPT models to extract this information from the narrative clinical notes. Different from the existing work, our research focuses on investigating the zero-shot learning on extracting this information together by providing minimum information to the GPT model. We utilize de-identified real-world clinical notes annotated for demographics, various social determinants, and family history information. Given that the GPT model might provide text different from the text in the original data, we explore two sets of evaluation metrics, including the traditional NER evaluation metrics and semantic similarity evaluation metrics, to completely understand the performance. Our results show that the GPT-3.5 method achieved an average of 0.975 F1 on demographics extraction, 0.615 F1 on social determinants extraction, and 0.722 F1 on family history extraction. We believe these results can be further improved through model fine-tuning or few-shots learning. Through the case studies, we also identified the limitations of the GPT models, which need to be addressed in future research.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, 1 in 5 adults currently serves as a family caregiver for an individual with a serious illness or disability. Unlike professional caregivers, family caregivers often assume this role without formal preparation or training. Thus, there is an urgent need to enhance the capacity of family caregivers to provide quality care. Leveraging technology as an educational tool or an adjunct to care is a promising approach that has the potential to enhance the learning and caregiving capabilities of family caregivers. Large language models (LLMs) can potentially be used as a foundation technology for supporting caregivers. An LLM can be categorized as a foundation model (FM), which is a large-scale model trained on a broad data set that can be adapted to a range of different domain tasks. Despite their potential, FMs have the critical weakness of \"hallucination,\" where the models generate information that can be misleading or inaccurate. Information reliability is essential when language models are deployed as front-line help tools for caregivers.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) develop a reliable caregiving language model (CaLM) by using FMs and a caregiving knowledge base, (2) develop an accessible CaLM using a small FM that requires fewer computing resources, and (3) evaluate the model\'s performance compared with a large FM.
METHODS: We developed a CaLM using the retrieval augmented generation (RAG) framework combined with FM fine-tuning for improving the quality of FM answers by grounding the model on a caregiving knowledge base. The key components of the CaLM are the caregiving knowledge base, a fine-tuned FM, and a retriever module. We used 2 small FMs as candidates for the foundation of the CaLM (LLaMA [large language model Meta AI] 2 and Falcon with 7 billion parameters) and adopted a large FM (GPT-3.5 with an estimated 175 billion parameters) as a benchmark. We developed the caregiving knowledge base by gathering various types of documents from the internet. We focused on caregivers of individuals with Alzheimer disease and related dementias. We evaluated the models\' performances using the benchmark metrics commonly used in evaluating language models and their reliability for providing accurate references with their answers.
RESULTS: The RAG framework improved the performance of all FMs used in this study across all measures. As expected, the large FM performed better than the small FMs across all metrics. Interestingly, the small fine-tuned FMs with RAG performed significantly better than GPT 3.5 across all metrics. The fine-tuned LLaMA 2 with a small FM performed better than GPT 3.5 (even with RAG) in returning references with the answers.
CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that a reliable and accessible CaLM can be developed using small FMs with a knowledge base specific to the caregiving domain.

UNASSIGNED: Previous studies evaluated the ability of large language models (LLMs) in medical disciplines; however, few have focused on image analysis, and none specifically on cardiovascular imaging or nuclear cardiology.
UNASSIGNED: This study assesses four LLMs - GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-4omni (GPT-4o) (Open AI), and Gemini (Google Inc.) - in responding to questions from the 2023 American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Board Preparation Exam, reflecting the scope of the Certification Board of Nuclear Cardiology (CBNC) examination.
UNASSIGNED: We used 168 questions: 141 text-only and 27 image-based, categorized into four sections mirroring the CBNC exam. Each LLM was presented with the same standardized prompt and applied to each section 30 times to account for stochasticity. Performance over six weeks was assessed for all models except GPT-4o. McNemar\'s test compared correct response proportions.
UNASSIGNED: GPT-4, Gemini, GPT4-Turbo, and GPT-4o correctly answered median percentiles of 56.8% (95% confidence interval 55.4% - 58.0%), 40.5% (39.9% - 42.9%), 60.7% (59.9% - 61.3%) and 63.1% (62.5 - 64.3%) of questions, respectively. GPT4o significantly outperformed other models (p=0.007 vs. GPT-4Turbo, p<0.001 vs. GPT-4 and Gemini). GPT-4o excelled on text-only questions compared to GPT-4, Gemini, and GPT-4 Turbo (p<0.001, p<0.001, and p=0.001), while Gemini performed worse on image-based questions (p<0.001 for all).
UNASSIGNED: GPT-4o demonstrated superior performance among the four LLMs, achieving scores likely within or just outside the range required to pass a test akin to the CBNC examination. Although improvements in medical image interpretation are needed, GPT-4o shows potential to support physicians in answering text-based clinical questions.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the consistency of Chatbot Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT)-4 in the analysis of clinical pictures of common laryngological conditions.
METHODS: Prospective uncontrolled study.
METHODS: Multicenter study.
METHODS: Patient history and clinical videolaryngostroboscopic images were presented to ChatGPT-4 for differential diagnoses, management, and treatment(s). ChatGPT-4 responses were assessed by 3 blinded laryngologists with the artificial intelligence performance instrument (AIPI). The complexity of cases and the consistency between practitioners and ChatGPT-4 for interpreting clinical images were evaluated with a 5-point Likert Scale. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to measure the strength of interrater agreement.
RESULTS: Forty patients with a mean complexity score of 2.60 ± 1.15. were included. The mean consistency score for ChatGPT-4 image interpretation was 2.46 ± 1.42. ChatGPT-4 perfectly analyzed the clinical images in 6 cases (15%; 5/5), while the consistency between GPT-4 and judges was high in 5 cases (12.5%; 4/5). Judges reported an ICC of 0.965 for the consistency score (P = .001). ChatGPT-4 erroneously documented vocal fold irregularity (mass or lesion), glottic insufficiency, and vocal cord paralysis in 21 (52.5%), 2 (0.05%), and 5 (12.5%) cases, respectively. ChatGPT-4 and practitioners indicated 153 and 63 additional examinations, respectively (P = .001). The ChatGPT-4 primary diagnosis was correct in 20.0% to 25.0% of cases. The clinical image consistency score was significantly associated with the AIPI score (rs = 0.830; P = .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The ChatGPT-4 is more efficient in primary diagnosis, rather than in the image analysis, selecting the most adequate additional examinations and treatments.