暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Utilization of low-volume preparation agents is crucial to improve patient willingness to undergo repeat colonoscopies. However, gastric safety data on preparation agents are limited. This study evaluated the acute gastropathy associated with bowel preparation agents.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study enrolled healthy subjects who underwent both esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy screening. Baseline patient characteristics, bowel preparation success, acute gastropathy, and polyp and adenoma detection rates were evaluated for 1 L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid (1 L PEG/Asc) and oral sulfate tablet (OST) groups.
UNASSIGNED: Comparison of the OST group (n=2,463) with the 1 L PEG/Asc group (n=2,060) revealed that the rates of successful cleansing and high-quality cleansing were similar between the two groups. Polyp and adenoma detection rates were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 1 L PEG/Asc group (p<0.001 and p=0.013), while the incidence of acute gastric mucosal lesion-like blood stain/clot, erosions at greater curvature side of antrum/body, multiple erosions, and overlying mucosal erythema or edema were all significantly higher in the OST group than in the 1 L PEG/Asc group (all p<0.001). Additionally, high and indeterminate probability scores of preparation agent-induced gastropathy (p=0.001) and mean Lanza scores were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 1 L PEG/Asc group (1.3 vs. 0.4, p<0.001).
UNASSIGNED: Compared with 1 L PEG/Asc, OSTs were significantly associated with acute gastropathy during bowel preparation, thus requiring careful consideration from physicians for the simultaneous screening of EGD and colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of esophageal cancers is increasing in many Western countries and the rate of missed esophageal cancers (MEC) at upper endoscopy is of concern. We aimed to calculate the MEC rate and identify factors associated with MEC.
METHODS: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study including 613 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer in Central Norway 2004-2021. MEC was defined as esophageal cancer diagnosed 6-36 months after a non-diagnostic upper endoscopy. Patient characteristics, tumor localization, histological type and cTNM stage were recorded. Symptoms, endoscopic findings, use of sedation and endoscopists experience at the endoscopy prior to esophageal cancer diagnosis and at the time of diagnosis were recorded. The association between these factors and MEC was assessed.
RESULTS: Forty-nine (8.0%) of 613 cancers were MEC. There was a significant increase in annual numbers of esophageal cancer (p < 0.001) as well as of MEC (p = 0.009), but MEC rate did not change significantly (p = 0.382). The median time from prior upper endoscopy to MEC diagnosis was 22.9 (12.1-28.6) months. MEC patients were older and were diagnosed with disease with a lower cTNM stage and cT category than non-missed cancers, whereas tumor localization and histological type were similar between the groups. The use of sedation or endoscopist experience did not differ between the endoscopy prior to esophageal cancer diagnosis and at the time of diagnosis. High proportions of MEC patients had Barrett\'s esophagus (n = 25, 51.0%), hiatus hernia (n = 26, 53.1%), esophagitis (n = 10, 20.4%) or ulceration (n = 4, 8.2%). Significant proportions of MECs were diagnosed after inappropriate follow-up of endoscopic Barrett\'s esophagus, histological dysplasia or ulcerations.
CONCLUSIONS: The annual number of MEC increased during the study period, while the MEC rate remained unchanged. Endoscopic findings related to gastroesophageal reflux disease such as esophagitis and Barrett\'s esophagus were identified in a high proportion of patients with subsequent MECs. Cautious follow-up of these patients could potentially reduce MEC-rate.

BACKGROUND: While bidirectional endoscopy is recognized as the standard approach for investigating iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in men older than 45 and postmenopausal women, evidence supporting the application of this approach in younger men and premenopausal women is scarce in the absence of symptoms. Our primary aim is to identify the diagnostic yield of bidirectional endoscopy in men younger than 45 and premenopausal women, and describe the clinical characteristics of those with significant endoscopic and pathology-proven findings.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review including patients younger than age 45 with IDA who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and/or colonoscopy at the Brooklyn VA Hospital between 2009 and 2023. Demographic, clinical, and endoscopic patient data was all collected, stratified, analyzed, and interpreted.
RESULTS: In 143 patients younger than age 45 with IDA, 28.6% were found to have positive upper gastrointestinal (GI) findings, of which 70.3% were pathology-proven H. pylori cases. 57.9% of patients reported upper GI symptoms, while 42.9% of patients were asymptomatic. In total, 18.2% of symptomatic patients were found to have clinically significant findings on EGD as compared with 42.9% of asymptomatic patients. Additionally, 9.1% of symptomatic patients were found to have biopsy proven H. pylori-associated gastritis or duodenitis as compared with 33.9% of asymptomatic patients. Of the patients who underwent colonoscopy, 8.3% were found to have lower GI lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: We found the diagnostic yield of EGD to be significantly higher than that of colonoscopy in younger IDA patients. Our findings suggest current guidelines are clinically relevant to the young patient cohort. Our study also found asymptomatic IDA patients below age 45 to have a significantly higher diagnostic yield of EGD as compared to symptomatic IDA patients within the same age cohort. The differences in diagnostic yields may be a result of symptomatic patients being more likely to have been prescribed proton pump inhibitors or histamine receptor antagonists prior to endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: In Tanzania, triphasic abdominal Computed Tomography (CT) is a more accessible and non-invasive alternative for diagnosing esophageal varices, though its accuracy has not been thoroughly evaluated, therefore this study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of triphasic abdominal CT in detecting esophageal varices using esophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) as the gold standard among patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding at Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH).
METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at MNH from January 2021 to May 2023. We sampled upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients who underwent both OGD and triphasic abdominal CT using non-probability consecutive sampling. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy of triphasic abdominal CT were assessed against OGD findings.
RESULTS: In a study of 200 participants, esophageal varices were detected in 54% by OGD and 53.5% by CT. We observed 105 true positives, 2 false positives, 90 true negatives, and 3 false negatives. Triphasic abdominal CT demonstrated a sensitivity of 97.2%, specificity of 97.8%, PPV of 98.1%, NPV of 96.8%, and an accuracy of 97.5%. Extraluminal findings included portal venous thrombosis in (22%), splenic collateral (51.5%), ascites (32%), hepatocellular carcinoma (13%), and periportal fibrosis (32%).
CONCLUSIONS: Triphasic abdominal Computed Tomography can be used as a reliable and non-invasive alternative modality for diagnosing and screening esophageal varices in resource-limited settings.

BACKGROUND: Theoretically, a rapid urease test (RUT) using a swab of the gastric wall (Swab-RUT) for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is safe. However, the validity and utility of Swab-RUT remain unclear. Therefore, we assessed the validity and utility of Swab-RUT compared to RUT using mucosal forceps of the gastric wall (Forceps-RUT) and 13C-urea breath test (UBT).
METHODS: This study was a multicenter prospective observational study. When the examinees were suspected of H. pylori infection during esophagogastroduodenoscopy, we performed Swab-RUT and Forceps-RUT continuously. When the examinees were not suspected of H. pylori infection, we performed Swab-RUT alone. We validated the status of H. pylori infection using UBT.
RESULTS: Ninety-four examinees were enrolled from four institutions between May 2016 and December 2020 (median age [range], 56.5 [26-88] years). In this study, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Swab-RUT to UBT were 0.933 (95% confidence interval: 0.779-0.992), 0.922 (0.827-0.974), and 0.926 (0.853-0.970), respectively. The Kappa coefficient of Swab-RUT to UBT was 0.833, and that of Swab-RUT to forceps-RUT was 0.936. No complications were observed in this study.
CONCLUSIONS: Swab-RUT is a valid examination for the status of H. pylori infection compared to the conventional Forceps-RUT.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Biliary stone disease is a highly prevalent condition and a leading cause of hospitalization worldwide. Hepatolithiasis with associated strictures has high residual and recurrence rates after traditional multisession percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotripsy (PTCSL).
OBJECTIVE: To study one-step PTCSL using the percutaneous transhepatic one-step biliary fistulation (PTOBF) technique guided by three-dimensional (3D) visualization.
METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center study analyzing, 140 patients who, between October 2016 and October 2023, underwent one-step PTCSL for hepatolithiasis. The patients were divided into two groups: The 3D-PTOBF group and the PTOBF group. Stone clearance on choledochoscopy, complications, and long-term clearance and recurrence rates were assessed.
RESULTS: Age, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, Child-Pugh class, and stone location were similar between the 2 groups, but there was a significant difference in bile duct strictures, with biliary strictures more common in the 3D-PTOBF group (P = 0.001). The median follow-up time was 55.0 (55.0, 512.0) days. The immediate stone clearance ratio (88.6% vs 27.1%, P = 0.000) and stricture resolution ratio (97.1% vs 78.6%, P = 0.001) in the 3D-PTOBF group were significantly greater than those in the PTOBF group. Postoperative complication (8.6% vs 41.4%, P = 0.000) and stone recurrence rates (7.1% vs 38.6%, P = 0.000) were significantly lower in the 3D-PTOBF group.
CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional visualization helps make one-step PTCSL a safe, effective, and promising treatment for patients with complicated primary hepatolithiasis. The perioperative and long-term outcomes are satisfactory for patients with complicated primary hepatolithiasis. This minimally invasive method has the potential to be used as a substitute for hepatobiliary surgery.