Background The placement of postoperative drains after spine surgery is a contentious issue, and its application has changed over time. Obesity itself is an independent risk factor for postoperative complications. Hematomas in the surgical wound are a complication that may necessitate revision surgery. Orthopaedic surgeons frequently use closed drainage in orthopaedic surgery to prevent the formation of a hematoma. It remains unclear whether drains reduce postoperative complications and improve clinical outcomes, especially in obese patients who are already at risk of such complications. Objectives To assess the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) after lumbar discectomy in obese and morbidly obese patients with or without postoperative wound drainage and compare functional outcomes between both groups. Methodology A hospital-based retrospective study was conducted among 84 patients with obesity who underwent single-level lumbar discectomy at R. L. Jalappa Hospital and Research Centre, Kolar, India from May 2022 to April 2023. Drains were used for patients in Group A and avoided for patients in Group B. Results Postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in the non-drainage group were much higher than in the drainage group and were statistically significant. There was a statistically significant association found between body mass index (BMI) and postoperative SSI. In Group A, only three patients had SSI while in Group B, eight patients suffered from SSI. Conclusion Closed suction drains were shown to have a positive impact in reducing SSI in patients with obesity. Drain tip culture may be beneficial in detecting SSI at the earliest. Hence, we believe that closed suction drainage can be considered as a standard protocol in obese patients.

UNASSIGNED: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a collection of blood, blood degradation products, and fluid that accumulate on the surface of the brain between its arachnoid and dural coverings. This study is to evaluate the efficacy of subgaleal drain (SGD) versus subgaleal dissection without drainage as adjuncts to burr-hole evacuation of CSDH.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective study was conducted utilizing the data of 60 patients operated for symptomatic CSDH. Patients were divided into two groups, each thirty consecutive patients: Group I, in which a SGD was inserted after CSDH evacuation through a burr-hole; and Group II, the hematoma was evacuated as in the Group I, but with no SGD insertion but instead a subgaleal pocket was created for drainage.
UNASSIGNED: The neurological improvement at 24 h, discharge, 2 weeks, and 6 months after surgery was comparable in both groups. The overall recurrence was 4 cases (4/60, 6.7%). The rate of recurrence and surgical infection rate were comparable in both groups. Both groups showed similar incidences of postoperative seizures, bleeding, rates of medical complications, and neurological deficits. The overall postoperative mortality was five cases (5/60, 8.3%) with no significant difference between groups.
UNASSIGNED: Blunt dissection to open the subgaleal space and closure without a drain is a safe and efficient alternative to the insertion of a drain after the burr-hole evacuation of CSDH.

Renal transplantation is common worldwide, with >25,000 procedures performed in 2022. Usage of prophylactic perinephric drains is variable in renal transplantation; drains are associated with risks, and there is a lack of consensus regarding benefit of routine drain placement in these patients. This meta-analysis assessed whether prophylactic drainage reduced need for reintervention postoperatively. This systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out using the Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis, and prospectively registered on PROSPERO. Summary statistics for outcomes of interest underwent meta-analyses to a confidence interval (CI) of 95% and are presented as Forest Plots for Odds Ratio (OR). A systematic literature search in June 2023 revealed 1,540 unique articles across four databases. Of these, four retrospective cohort studies were selected. Meta-analysis of three studies showed no significant reduction in reintervention rate with pre-emptive drain placement, OR = 0.59 (95% CI: 0.16-2.23), p = 0.44. Meta-analysis did not show a significant reduction in perinephric collections with prophylactic drain insertion OR = 0.55 (95% CI: 0.13-2.37), p = 0.42. Finally, there is not good evidence that drain placement reduces superficial wound complications or improves 12-month graft survival. Further work is needed, including well-designed, prospective studies to assess the risks and benefits of drain placement in these patients. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023422685, Identifier PROSPERO CRD42021255795.

BACKGROUND: The use of drains after primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has shown little benefit. Few studies have investigated drain usage after revision TJA. The purpose of this study was to determine whether utilizing suction drains is beneficial for patients undergoing revision arthroplasty.
METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature review utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines from the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria of this review were all original articles written in English investigating the efficacy and safety of closed suction drainage in revision TKA or THA, reporting at least one of the following outcome measures: (1) estimated blood loss (EBL), (2) perioperative hemoglobin change, (3) needs for transfusion, (4) postoperative infection, and (5) wound complications. Articles were excluded if they are not available in English or they included case reports, systematic reviews, comments, editorials, surveys, or animal studies prior to July 22, 2023. A total of six studies met inclusion criteria. In total, 655 patients had a drain while 1765 patients did not have a drain after revision total hip or knee arthroplasty. Primary outcomes included for meta-analysis included estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative hemoglobin, need for transfusion. Other data extracted includes postoperative infections, and wound complications.
RESULTS: Six studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, 655 patients had drains, while 1765 patients did not after revision total hip or knee arthroplasty. The average age of the patients was 66.1+/- 3.4 years, and the average BMI was 30.3 +/-0.8. There was no difference in postoperative infections (p = 0.14), wound complications (p = 0.621) or need for transfusion (p = 0.521) between the two groups. There was also no difference in EBL (Hedges\' g CI[-3.52, 2.77]) or postoperative Hb (Hedges\' g CI[-1.65, 2.41]) between patients with and without drains.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not show any benefit from drain placement after revision total hip or knee arthroplasty. With the increased cost, time and need for drain removal, this is likely an unnecessary intervention.
METHODS: Level III, systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) are inflammatory cytokines produced in response to biological invasion or infection. Their levels are elevated in the blood and locally. We examined whether measuring IL-6 and TNF-α levels in serum or drainage fluid on postoperative day (POD) 1 could detect infectious complications after minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer.
METHODS: This cohort study included 205 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer between November 2020 and July 2023. We measured serum and drainage fluid IL-6 and TNF-α levels on POD 1 after gastrectomy. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created to compare the diagnostic values of each cytokine and serum C-reactive protein levels for detecting postoperative infectious complications.
RESULTS: IL-6 and TNF-α levels in the serum or drainage fluid were significantly higher in patients with an infectious complication. In addition, drainage fluid IL-6 levels were significantly different in patients with versus without intra-abdominal abscess. In the ROC curve analysis, serum and drainage fluid IL-6 had the highest AUC values for any infectious complication and intra-abdominal abscess, respectively. POD 1 serum IL-6 level above 47 pg/mL could detect any infectious complication with sensitivity of 74.1 % and specificity of 71.8 %. POD 1 drainage fluid IL-6 level above 14,750 pg/mL had 100 % sensitivity for detecting intra-abdominal abscess with specificity of 56.0 %.
CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of IL-6 levels in blood and drainage fluid on POD 1 is valuable for early detection of postoperative infectious complications or intra-abdominal abscess after gastric cancer surgery.

Testing for dispersal of fluorescent gel from sink drains was sensitive for detection of sinks that dispersed gram-negative bacilli outside the bowl. Reducing the flow rate of sinks with rapid water inflow and/or elimination of obstruction leading to slow outflow was effective in preventing dispersal of fluorescence and gram-negative bacilli.

With increasing interest in swift postoperative recovery, there has been a trend toward omitting drains in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap-based breast reconstruction, ideally aiming to avoid drains in the breasts and abdomen. This study evaluated our transition toward total drainless reconstruction, focusing specifically on the safety of omitting drains in the breasts. Patients who underwent breast reconstruction with DIEP flap from 2018 to 2023 were reviewed. They were divided into 3 groups: group A (with drains in the abdomen and breast), group B (drains only in the breast), and group C (total drainless). For group C, routine ultrasound examinations were performed to check for fluid accumulation. Complication profiles were compared among the groups. In total, 294 cases were included, comprising 77 in group A, 112 in group B, and 105 in group C. Chronologically, a gradual increase in the proportion of cases in group C was observed, with the complication rates remaining stable. On comparing the complication profiles of the recipient and donor sites among the 3 groups, no significant differences were found. Breast seroma, persisting 1 month postoperatively, was exclusively detected in 6 (5.7%) cases within group C, all of whom were treated with outpatient clinic-based aspiration. When restricting the analysis to group C, a greater weight of mastectomy specimen and axillary lymph node dissections exhibited an independent association with breast seroma development. Smooth transition to total drainless DIEP breast reconstruction appears safe, without significantly increasing the risks of complication.

BACKGROUND: Ventral hernia repair (VHR) is one of the most common procedures in the United States, and drains are used in over 50% of mesh repairs. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of drains on surgical site occurrences (SSO) and infection (SSI) after open and minimally invasive retromuscular VHR with mesh.
METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from the ACHQC was performed to include adult patients who underwent elective VHR with retromuscular mesh placement. Univariate analysis was performed comparing drain and no-drain groups. A logistic regression was performed to identify factors independently associated with increased SSO, SSI, readmission, and length of stay (LOS).
RESULTS: 6945 patients underwent elective VHR with sublay mesh. Most patients had M2 and M3 hernias in both groups (with Drain and no-drain). The median LOS was 4.7 (SD 8.3) in the drain group and 1.6 (SD 8.4) in the no-drain group (p < 0.001). 30-day SSI was higher in the drain group (176; 3.8% vs 25; 1.1%; p < 0.001). Despite lower SSO overall in the drain group (470; 10.0% vs 286; 12.7%; p < 0.001), SSO or SSI requiring intervention (SSOPI) was higher in the drain group (240; 5.1% vs 44; 1.9%; p < 0.001). Logistic regression identified diabetes (OR 1.3, CI 1.1-1.6; p < 0.001) and BMI (OR 1.04, CI 1.03-1.05; p < 0.001) as predictors of SSO, while the use of a drain was protective (OR 0.61; CI 0.5-0.8; p < 0.001). For SSI, logistic regression showed diabetes (OR 1.6, CI 1.2-2.3; p = 0.004) and open approach (OR 3.5, CI 2.1-5.9; p < 0.001) as predictors.
CONCLUSIONS: Drain placement during retromuscular VHR with mesh was predictive of decreased postoperative SSO occurrence but associated with increased LOS. Diabetes and open approach, but not drain use, were predictors of SSI.

BACKGROUND: Owing to limited outpatient support for drain management, delayed discharge after mastectomy is more prevalent in developing countries. Utilising half-vacuum (HV) suction drains for routine drainage after mastectomy could lead to a reduced incidence of seroma and a shorter hospital stay. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the outcomes of HV against full-vacuum (FV) suction drains in patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer.
METHODS: Differences between the two groups in length of hospital stay, total volume of drain effluent and incidence of seroma were assessed. RevMan 5.4 was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and relative risk (RR) for dichotomous data, and the mean difference (MD) for continuous data.
RESULTS: Nine randomised controlled trials were included in this review. Using HV drains reduced both the mean length of hospital stay (MD: -2.30 days, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -4.10 to -0.49 days, I2=97%) and the mean total volume of effluent (MD: -132.61ml, 95% CI: -207.32ml to -57.91ml, I2=88%) compared with FV drains. However, there was no statistically significant difference in incidence of seroma between the two groups (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.30 to 1.46, I2=65%). Likewise, there was no difference in rate of seroma occurrence on sensitivity analysis (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 0.72 to 2.33, I2=74%).
CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the incidence of seroma between HV and FV suction drainage. Conversely, a reduction in the length of hospital stay and the total volume of drain effluent was observed for mastectomy patients with a HV drain.

UNASSIGNED: Surgical-site infections (SSIs) are the most common complication after stoma closure. We propose a new method for wound closure using the subcutaneous large-bite buried suture (SLBS) technique and a closed suction drain (CSD). In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of a combination of the SLBS technique and a CSD to prevent superficial SSIs following stoma closure.
UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent stoma closure between January 2019 and July 2022. Primary closure of the stomal site was performed using the SLBS technique and a CSD for wound closure. The CSD was placed until postoperative day 7. The occurrence of superficial postoperative SSIs was also evaluated.
UNASSIGNED: In total, 67 patients were included in the study. Within 30 days postoperatively, nine patients (13%) developed superficial SSIs. Considering the type of stoma, only 1 (2%) of 45 patients with ileostomy showed superficial SSIs, whereas 8 (36%) of 22 patients with colostomy showed superficial SSIs. Univariate analysis of the risk factors associated with the occurrence of superficial SSIs revealed that colostomy (p < 0.001) and hand-sewn anastomosis were significant risk factors (p = 0.019). Multivariate analysis of the risk factors associated with the occurrence of superficial SSIs revealed that colostomy was significant risk factor (p = 0.003).
UNASSIGNED: This new method of stoma closure is feasible for preventing superficial SSIs, especially in ileostomy closure.