Complications

并发症
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于关节固定术的可靠率,采用侧块螺钉的后颈椎融合术(PCF)是改善有症状的假关节的有利治疗选择;然而,这种技术增加了伤口感染和再入院的风险。涉及关节面固定器械的保留组织的PCF方法可降低术后并发症的发生率,同时稳定症状水平以实现关节固定术;然而,这些结局仅限于来自个别外科医生的小型研究队列,这些外科医生通常具有混合治疗适应症.
    150例病例来自美国6个地点的7名外科医生进行的回顾性图表审查。所有病例均在颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术(ACDF)后从C3到C7的一个或多个级别进行了PCF翻修。PCF是使用小平面器械的组织保留技术进行的。涉及额外补充固定的病例,如侧块螺钉,棒,电线,或其他硬件被排除在外。人口统计,操作注释,术后并发症,医院再入院,和随后的手术干预被总结为一个完整的队列,并根据以下风险因素:年龄,性别,修订的级别数,体重指数(BMI),和尼古丁使用史。
    PCF翻修时患者的平均年龄为55±11岁,63%为女性。平均BMI为29±6kg/m2,有19%的人报告有尼古丁使用史。术后随访的中位数为68天(四分位距=41-209天),从修订PCF开始。有91个1级,492级,83级,24±水平PCF翻修病例。平均手术时间为52±3分钟,估计失血量为14±1.5cc。参与者在手术后平均1±0.05天出院。多级治疗导致更长的手术时间(单次=45分钟,multi=59min,P=0.01),但不影响估计的失血量(P=0.94)。通过多级治疗,医院的总夜晚增加了0.2个夜晚(P=0.01)。性,年龄,尼古丁病史,BMI对记录的围手术期结局无影响.有一次因深静脉血栓而再次住院,用ACDF治疗的1例修订水平的持续性假关节,和四个相邻节段疾病的实例。在最初接受多水平ACDF治疗的患者中,修订最常见于尾部水平(修订水平的48%),其次是颅骨(43%),最不经常处于中等水平(9%)。
    此围手术期和安全性结果的图表回顾提供了证据,支持保留组织的PCF与小关节器械治疗ACDF后有症状的假关节。需要翻修的最常见位置是尾和颅骨水平。与开放式替代方案相比,手术持续时间和估计的失血量是有利的。术后没有伤口感染,大多数患者在手术后第二天出院。
    UNASSIGNED: Posterior cervical fusion (PCF) with lateral mass screws is a favorable treatment option to revise a symptomatic pseudarthrosis due to reliable rates of arthrodesis; however, this technique introduces elevated risk for wound infection and hospital readmission. A tissue-sparing PCF approach involving facet fixation instrumentation reduces the rates of postoperative complications while stabilizing the symptomatic level to achieve arthrodesis; however, these outcomes have been limited to small study cohorts from individual surgeons commonly with mixed indications for treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: One hundred and fifty cases were identified from a retrospective chart review performed by seven surgeons across six sites in the United States. All cases involved PCF revision for a pseudarthrosis at one or more levels from C3 to C7 following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). PCF was performed using a tissue-sparing technique with facet instrumentation. Cases involving additional supplemental fixation such as lateral mass screws, rods, wires, or other hardware were excluded. Demographics, operative notes, postoperative complications, hospital readmission, and subsequent surgical interventions were summarized as an entire cohort and according to the following risk factors: age, sex, number of levels revised, body mass index (BMI), and history of nicotine use.
    UNASSIGNED: The average age of patients at the time of PCF revision was 55 ± 11 years and 63% were female. The average BMI was 29 ± 6 kg/m2 and 19% reported a history of nicotine use. Postoperative follow-up visits were available with a median of 68 days (interquartile range = 41-209 days) from revision PCF. There were 91 1-level, 49 2-level, 8 3-level, and 2 4±-level PCF revision cases. The mean operative duration was 52 ± 3 min with an estimated blood loss of 14 ± 1.5cc. Participants were discharged an average of 1 ± 0.05 days following surgery. Multilevel treatment resulted in longer procedure times (single = 45 min, multi = 59 min, P = 0.01) but did not impact estimated blood loss (P = 0.94). Total nights in the hospital increased by 0.2 nights with multilevel treatment (P = 0.01). Sex, age, nicotine history, and BMI had no effect on recorded perioperative outcomes. There was one instance of rehospitalization due to deep-vein thrombosis, one instance of persistent pseudarthrosis at the revised level treated with ACDF, and four instances of adjacent segment disease. In patients initially treated with multilevel ACDF, revisions occurred most commonly on the caudal level (48% of revised levels), followed by the cranial (43%), and least often in the middle level (9%).
    UNASSIGNED: This chart review of perioperative and safety outcomes provides evidence in support of tissue-sparing PCF with facet instrumentation as a treatment for symptomatic pseudarthrosis after ACDF. The most common locations requiring revision were the caudal and cranial levels. Operative duration and estimated blood loss were favorable when compared to open alternatives. There were no instances of postoperative wound infection, and the majority of patients were discharged the day following surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    烧伤是一种被低估的严重伤害,对幸存者的身体产生负面影响,心理上和经济上,因此是相当大的公共卫生负担。尽管烧伤治疗取得了重大进展,许多烧伤仍未愈合或出现严重的并发症/后遗症。核苷酸结合寡聚化结构域样受体(NLRs)家族含pyrin结构域3(NLRP3)炎性体是伤口愈合的关键调节因子,包括烧伤伤口愈合。更好地了解烧伤创面愈合的病理生理机制可能有助于找到促进烧伤创面愈合的最佳治疗靶点。减少烧伤后的并发症/后遗症,最大限度地恢复烧伤皮肤的结构和功能。本文旨在总结目前对NLRP3炎性体在烧伤创面愈合中的作用和调控机制的认识。以及NLRP3抑制剂参与烧伤治疗的临床前研究,强调NLRP3靶向治疗在烧伤创面中的潜在应用。
    Burns are an underestimated serious injury negatively impacting survivors physically, psychologically and economically, and thus are a considerable public health burden. Despite significant advancements in burn treatment, many burns still do not heal or develop serious complications/sequelae. The nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptors (NLRs) family pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome is a critical regulator of wound healing, including burn wound healing. A better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanism underlying the healing of burn wounds may help find optimal therapeutic targets to promote the healing of burn wounds, reduce complications/sequelae following burn, and maximize the restoration of structure and function of burn skin. This review aimed to summarize current understanding of the roles and regulatory mechanisms of the NLRP3 inflammasome in burn wound healing, as well as the preclinical studies of the involvement of NLRP3 inhibitors in burn treatment, highlighting the potential application of NLRP3-targeted therapy in burn wounds.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:描述临床实验室概况并分析与COVID-19严重程度相关的因素。
    方法:一项前瞻性队列研究,涉及累西腓一家三级医院收治的COVID-19患者,巴西。所有病例均通过RT-PCR确认,并根据严重程度标准进行分类。对人群特征进行了描述性统计分析。通过使用一般方程估计(GEE)模型计算比值比(OR),根据严重程度分析与病例结果相关的危险因素。
    结果:在纳入的75例中,64%是女性,62.7%年龄在65岁或以上。中位住院时间为9天(6-14天)。高血压(65.3%)和糖尿病(36%)是最常见的合并症。严重形式的COVID-19占样本的41.3%。与严重程度相关的因素是哮喘病史(OR=4.58,95CI:1.13-18.7),厌食症报告(OR=1,12,95CI:1.01-1.24),和实验室变化,包括血小板升高(OR=1.00,95%CI:1.00-1.01),D二聚体升高(OR=1,26,95%CI:1.04-1.52),天冬氨酸转氨酶升高(OR=1.00,95%CI:1.00-1.01),和γ-谷氨酰转移酶(OR=1.22,IC95%:0.98-1.51),高钠血症(OR=1.31,95CI:1.12-1.52),和高钾血症(OR=1.21,95%CI:1.04-1.41)。
    结论:多系统受累有血栓形成倾向,电解质干扰,和肝脏侵犯,反映在实验室的变化,是与COVID-19严重程度相关的因素。
    OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical-laboratory profile and analyze the factors associated with the severity of COVID-19.
    METHODS: A prospective cohort study involving patients with COVID-19 admitted to a tertiary hospital in Recife, Brazil. All cases were confirmed by RT-PCR and classified according to severity criteria. A descriptive statistical analysis of the population\'s characteristics was conducted. Risk factors associated with the outcome of the case according to severity were analyzed by calculating the odds ratio (OR) using the general equation estimation (GEE) model.
    RESULTS: Among the 75 cases included, 64% were female, and 62.7% were aged 65 years or older. The median length of stay was 9 days (6 - 14). Hypertension (65.3%) and Diabetes Mellitus (36%) were the most frequent comorbidities. Severe forms of COVID-19 constituted 41.3% of the sample. The factors associated with severity were a history of asthma (OR=4.58, 95%CI:1.13 - 18.7), report of anorexia (OR=1, 12, 95%CI:1.01-1.24), and laboratory changes that included elevated platelets (OR=1.00, 95% CI:1.00-1.01), elevated D\'Dimer (OR=1, 26, 95% CI:1.04-1.52), elevated aspartate aminotransferase (OR=1.00, 95% CI:1.00-1.01), and gamma-glutamyl transferase (OR=1.22, IC95 %:0.98-1.51), hypernatremia (OR=1.31, 95%CI:1.12-1.52), and hyperkalemia (OR=1.21, 95% CI:1.04-1.41).
    CONCLUSIONS: Multisystemic involvement with a tendency for thrombophilia, electrolyte disturbances, and hepatic aggression, reflected by laboratory changes, were factors associated with the severity of COVID-19.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    方法:本研究为回顾性多中心比较队列研究。
    方法:采用回顾性的成人脊柱畸形手术患者的机构数据库。包括骶骨/骨盆在内的所有>5个椎体水平的融合均符合纳入条件。修订,3柱截骨术,临床随访<2年的患者被排除在外。根据手术入路将患者分为3组:1)后路无椎间融合术(PSF),2)带椎体间的PSF(PSF-IB),和3)前后路(AP)融合(前路腰椎椎体间融合或后路螺钉固定的外侧腰椎椎体间融合)。术中,射线照相,和临床结果,以及并发症,组间比较采用方差分析和χ2检验。
    结果:纳入了118名患者进行研究(PSF,n=37;PSF-IB,n=44;AP,n=57)。术中,两组间估计的失血量相似(p=0.171).然而,与PSF(385.1)和PSF-IB(370.7)相比,AP组手术时间更长(547.5min)(p<0.001).此外,与AP(13.6)和PSF(12.9)相比,PSF-IB(11.4)的融合长度较短(p=0.004).从术前到术后2年,两组之间的对齐变化没有差异。临床结果无差异。虽然术后并发症在各组之间基本相似,与PSF(5.4%)和PSF-IB(9.1)组相比,AP组(31.6%)的手术并发症较高(p<0.001).
    结论:虽然术中结果(手术时间和融合长度)存在差异,术后临床或影像学结局无差异.AP融合与较高的手术并发症发生率相关。
    METHODS: This study was a retrospective multi-center comparative cohort study.
    METHODS: A retrospective institutional database of operative adult spinal deformity patients was utilized. All fusions > 5 vertebral levels and including the sacrum/pelvis were eligible for inclusion. Revisions, 3 column osteotomies, and patients with < 2-year clinical follow-up were excluded. Patients were separated into 3 groups based on surgical approach: 1) posterior spinal fusion without interbody (PSF), 2) PSF with interbody (PSF-IB), and 3) anteroposterior (AP) fusion (anterior lumbar interbody fusion or lateral lumbar interbody fusion with posterior screw fixation). Intraoperative, radiographic, and clinical outcomes, as well as complications, were compared between groups with ANOVA and χ2 tests.
    RESULTS: One-hundred and thirty-eight patients were included for study (PSF, n = 37; PSF-IB, n = 44; AP, n = 57). Intraoperatively, estimated blood loss was similar between groups (p = 0.171). However, the AP group had longer operative times (547.5 min) compared to PSF (385.1) and PSF-IB (370.7) (p < 0.001). Additionally, fusion length was shorter in PSF-IB (11.4) compared to AP (13.6) and PSF (12.9) (p = 0.004). There were no differences between the groups in terms of change in alignment from preoperative to 2 years postoperative. There were no differences in clinical outcomes. While postoperative complications were largely similar between groups, operative complications were higher in the AP group (31.6%) compared to the PSF (5.4%) and PSF-IB (9.1) groups (p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: While there were differences in intraoperative outcomes (operative time and fusion length), there were no differences in postoperative clinical or radiographic outcomes. AP fusion was associated with a higher rate of operative complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为了避免最令人讨厌的硬脑膜撕裂手术器械,我们开发了一种用于单侧双孔内窥镜(UBE)脊柱手术的“无穿孔”减压技术。
    方法:这项回顾性研究连续纳入68例退行性腰椎管狭窄患者。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评价腰腿痛的治疗效果,日本骨科协会(JOA)评分,和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)。使用术前和术后磁共振成像评估放射学结果。
    结果:这项研究包括36名男性和32名女性患者,他们接受了109段减压,平均年龄为68.7岁(37-90岁)。平均手术时间为52.2分钟。平均住院时间为3.1天。没有硬脑膜撕裂,但有3次轻微的手术并发症,都被保守对待。腰腿痛的VAS从4.6和7.0提高到0.8和1.2。JOA评分由16.2分提高至26.8分,改善率为82.0%。ODI从50.1提高到18.7。所有这些改善都具有统计学意义。硬膜截面积由61.1mm2提高到151.3mm2,平均增加90.2mm2和205.3%。保留了同侧小关节的87.1%和对侧小关节的84.7%。在61%的解压缩段中,同侧小关节的保存效果优于对侧小关节。
    结论:UBE“无穿孔”减压技术有效避免了硬膜撕裂。它提供了有效的神经减压,出色的小关节保护,和良好的治疗效果。
    OBJECTIVE: To avoid the most offending surgical instrument for dural tears, we develop a \"no-punch\" decompression technique for unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) spine surgery.
    METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 68 consecutive patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis segments. The treatment results were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) for low back and leg pain, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Radiological outcomes were evaluated using the preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.
    RESULTS: This study included 36 male and 32 female patients who received 109 segments of decompression, with an average age of 68.7 (37-90 years). The average operation time was 52.2 minutes. The average hospital stay was 3.1 days. There were no dural tears but 3 minor surgical complications, all treated conservatively. The VAS for low back and leg pain improved from 4.6 and 7.0 to 0.8 and 1.2. The JOA score improved from 16.2 to 26.8, with an improvement rate of 82.0%. The ODI improved from 50.1 to 18.7. All these improvements were statistically significant. The cross-sectional dural area improved from 61.1 to 151.3 mm2, with an average increase of 90.2 mm2 and 205.3%. 87.1% of the ipsilateral facet joints and 84.7% of the contralateral facet joints were preserved. In 61% of the decompressed segments, the ipsilateral facet joints were preserved better than the contralateral facet joints.
    CONCLUSIONS: The UBE \"no-punch\" decompression technique effectively avoids the dural tears. It provides effective neural decompression, excellent facet joint preservation, and good treatment outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:教科书结果(TOs)的概念作为评估复杂手术后结果的质量和成功的关键指标得到了越来越多的关注。开发并验证了一种简单而有效的评分系统,以预测肝细胞癌(HCC)肝切除术后未达到教科书结果(非TOs)的风险。
    方法:使用多中心前瞻性收集的数据库,在接受HCC肝切除术的患者中,发现与非TO相关的危险因素.基于从多变量回归分析中确定的因素的预测评分系统用于相对于非TO患者的风险分层。该评分是使用整个队列的70%开发的,并在剩余的30%中进行了验证。
    结果:在3681名患者中,1458(39.6%)未能体验到TO。根据派生队列,肥胖,美国麻醉医师协会评分(ASA评分),Child-Pugh年级,肿瘤大小,和肝切除术的程度被确定为非TO的独立预测因素。评分系统范围从0到10分。患者分为低(0-3分),中级(4-6分),和非TO的高风险(7-10分)。在验证队列中,发生非TOs的预测风险为39.0%,这与观察到的39.9%的风险密切相关。在不同的风险类别中,预测和观察到的风险之间没有差异。
    结论:一种新的评分系统能够准确预测HCC肝切除术后的非TO风险。该评分可以早期识别有不良后果风险的个体,并为手术决策提供信息。和质量改进举措。
    OBJECTIVE: The concept of textbook outcomes (TOs) has gained increased attention as a critical metric to assess the quality and success of outcomes following complex surgery. A simple yet effective scoring system was developed and validated to predict risk of not achieving textbook outcomes (non-TOs) following hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
    METHODS: Using a multicenter prospectively collected database, risk factors associated with non-TO among patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC were identified. A predictive scoring system based on factors identified from multivariate regression analysis was used to risk stratify patients relative to non-TO. The score was developed using 70 % of the overall cohort and validated in the remaining 30 %.
    RESULTS: Among 3681 patients, 1458 (39.6 %) failied to experience a TO. Based on the derivation cohort, obesity, American Society of Anaesthesiologists score(ASA score), Child-Pugh grade, tumor size, and extent of hepatectomy were identified as independent predictors of non-TO. The scoring system ranged from 0 to 10 points. Patients were categorized into low (0-3 points), intermediate (4-6 points), and high risk (7-10 points) of non-TO. In the validation cohort, the predicted risk of developing non-TOs was 39.0 %, which closely matched the observed risk of 39.9 %. There were no differences among the predicted and observed risks within the different risk categories.
    CONCLUSIONS: A novel scoring system was able to predict risk of non-TO accurately following hepatectomy for HCC. The score may enable early identification of individuals at risk of adverse outcomes and inform surgical decision-making, and quality improvement initiatives.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估不同水泥类型对骨水泥在种植体基台上的氧化锆和金属陶瓷单冠(SC)失效和保留损失的发生率的影响。
    方法:我们在358例患者中放置了567个植入支持的SCs,并回顾性评估了长达12.8年的长期保留。框架由金属合金(n=307)或氧化锆(n=260)制成。在标准化(n=446)或定制(n=121)基台上,用永久性(玻璃离聚物水泥;n=376)或半永久性水泥(氧化锌非丁香酚水泥;n=191)胶结SC。Kaplan-Meier曲线用于计算消除的发生率。用对数秩检验评估存活曲线之间的差异。采用Cox回归分析评价多危险因素。
    结果:在567个SCs中,22例由于技术并发症而失败,4例由于植入物丢失而失败。在50个SC中观察到保留的损失。分析显示10年后,氧化锆保留率损失的概率为7%,金属陶瓷SC保留率损失的概率为16%(p=0.011)。五年后,标准化桥台的保留损失高于定制桥台(p=.014)。半永久性水泥的保留率损失的可能性高于永久性水泥(p=.001)。Cox回归分析显示半永久性水泥是SC失效的唯一重要风险因素(p=.026)。
    结论:与半永久水泥相比,永久性骨水泥提供了可接受的长期保留骨水泥植入物支持的SCs。定制基台的这些可能的积极影响必须用更大的样本量来控制。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of different cement types on the incidence of failure and loss of retention of zirconia and metal-ceramic single crowns (SCs) cemented on implant abutments.
    METHODS: We placed 567 implant-supported SCs in 358 patients and retrospectively evaluated long-term retention for up to 12.8 years. The frameworks were made from metal alloy (n = 307) or zirconia (n = 260). SCs were cemented with permanent (glass-ionomer cement; n = 376) or semipermanent cement (zinc oxide non-eugenol cement; n = 191) on standardized (n = 446) or customized (n = 121) abutments. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to calculate the incidence of decementation. Differences between survival curves were assessed with log-rank tests. Cox-regression analysis was performed to evaluate multiple risk factors.
    RESULTS: Of the 567 SCs, 22 failed because of technical complications and four because of implant loss. Loss of retention was observed in 50 SCs. Analysis revealed a 7% probability of loss of retention for zirconia and 16% for metal-ceramic SCs after 10 years (p = .011). After 5 years, loss of retention was higher for standardized abutments than for customized abutments (p = .014). The probability of loss of retention was higher with semipermanent than with permanent cement (p = .001). Cox-regression analysis revealed semipermanent cement as the only significant risk factor for SC failure (p = .026).
    CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to semipermanent cement, permanent cement provides acceptable long-term retention of cemented implant-supported SCs. These possible positive effects of customized abutments have to be controlled with larger sample sizes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    静脉空气栓塞(VAE)是在神经外科手术中遇到的一种罕见但可能危及生命的并发症。尤其是开颅手术.这里,我们介绍一例30岁男性,正在接受小脑脓肿切除术,在手术中途出现VAE.立即识别和干预对于有效管理栓塞至关重要,确保良好的手术效果。警惕的监控,立即停止程序,实施氧气治疗和静脉空气吸入等预防措施对减轻栓塞的影响至关重要。这项研究强调了术中警惕的重要性,准备,和多学科的团队合作,以解决神经外科干预期间罕见但潜在的灾难性并发症。
    Venous air embolism (VAE) represents a rare yet potentially life-threatening complication encountered during neurosurgical procedures, particularly craniotomy. Here, we present a case of a 30-year-old male undergoing excision of a cerebellar abscess who developed VAE midway through the procedure. Immediate recognition and intervention were paramount in managing the embolism effectively, ensuring a favorable surgical outcome. Vigilant monitoring, prompt cessation of the procedure, and implementation of preventive measures such as oxygen therapy and venous air aspiration were pivotal in mitigating the embolism\'s effects. This study underscores the critical importance of intraoperative vigilance, preparedness, and multidisciplinary teamwork in addressing rare but potentially catastrophic complications during neurosurgical interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在调查韩国某三级儿童医院水合氯醛镇静失败和并发症的危险因素。
    对2021年1月1日至2022年3月30日期间使用水合氯醛进行儿科程序镇静的回顾性分析。收集的数据包括患者特征,镇静史,和程序。进行多因素回归分析以确定程序镇静失败和并发症的危险因素。
    共纳入6691例手术镇静;1457例患者(21.8%)发生水合氯醛(50mg/kg)后镇静失败,与成功镇静的患者相比,总并发症发生率更高(17.5%[225/1457]vs.6.2%[322/5234];P<0.001;比值比,3.236).在多元回归分析中,以下因素与镇静失败的风险增加相关:普通病房或重症监护病房住院患者(与门诊患者相比);先天性综合征;氧依赖性;镇静失败或水合氯醛并发症的病史;手术超过60分钟;和磁共振成像,放射治疗,或具有疼痛或强烈刺激的程序(所有P值<0.05)。导致并发症的因素包括普通病房住院患者,先天性综合征,先天性心脏病,早产,氧依赖性,水合氯醛并发症的病史,水合氯醛目前镇静失败(所有P值<0.05)。
    为了实现水合氯醛的成功镇静,患者的镇静史,危险因素,应考虑程序的类型和持续时间。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for chloral hydrate sedation failure and complications in a tertiary children\'s hospital in South Korea.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective analysis of pediatric procedural sedation with chloral hydrate between January 1, 2021, and March 30, 2022, was performed. The collected data included patient characteristics, sedation history, and procedure. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for procedural sedation failure and complications.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 6691 procedural sedation were included in the analysis; sedation failure following chloral hydrate (50 mg/kg) occurred in 1457 patients (21.8%) and was associated with a higher rate of overall complications compared to those with successful sedation (17.5% [225 / 1457] vs. 6.2% [322 / 5234]; P < 0.001; odds ratio, 3.236). In the multivariable regression analysis, the following factors were associated with increased risk of sedation failure: general ward or intensive care unit inpatient (compared with outpatient); congenital syndrome; oxygen dependency; history of sedation failure or complications with chloral hydrate; procedure more than 60 min; and magnetic resonance imaging, radiotherapy, or procedures with painful or intense stimuli (all P values < 0.05). Factors contributing to the complications included general ward inpatient, congenital syndromes, congenital heart disease, preterm birth, oxygen dependency, history of complications with chloral hydrate, and current sedation failure with chloral hydrate (all P values < 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: To achieve successful sedation with chloral hydrate, the patient\'s sedation history, risk factors, and the type and duration of the procedure should be considered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:早期报告表明,由于困难和潜在的进入并发症,先前的腹部手术是腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的相对禁忌症。这项研究分析了以前手术的不同类型/系统和疤痕的位置以及它们如何影响进入困难。由于减少并发症风险的修改后的进入技术报告不足,因此研究细节并对其进行评估。
    方法:分析了由一名外科医生连续30年进行的LC和胆总管探查(LCBDE)的前瞻性数据。记录了以前的腹部手术,并使用卡方分析将围手术期结果与以前没有手术的患者进行了比较。
    结果:5916LC和LCBDE,1846例患者(31.2%)曾进行过腹部手术。中位年龄为60岁。先前手术的患者需要更频繁的十二指肠(RR1.07;p=0.023),肝曲(RR1.11;p=0.043)和远端粘连松解术(RR3.57;p<0.001),并且有更多的通路相关的肠损伤(0.4%vs.0.0%;p<0.001)。既往上消化道和胆道手术的粘连松解率最高(76.3%),困难的囊性椎弓根(58.8%),眼底优先法(7.2%),难度等级(64.9%3-5级)和腹腔引流利用率(71.1%)。与先前的腹腔镜手术相比,先前的开放手术导致更长的手术时间(65vs.55min;p<0.001),椎弓根夹层的难度增加(42.4%vs.36.0%;p<0.05),需要更多的十二指肠,肝曲和远处粘连松解术(p<0.05)和眼底优先解剖(4%vs2%;p<0.05)。163例患者(8.8%)使用了上腹部和脐上入路以及通过脐和其他疝入路,没有肠道并发症。
    结论:既往接受胆道手术的腹部瘢痕患者的进入和粘连松解的风险取决于既往手术的性质。以前打开,上消化道和胆道手术的风险最大.可以采用修改的访问技术来安全地减轻这些风险。
    BACKGROUND: Early reports suggested that previous abdominal surgery was a relative contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) on account of difficulty and potential access complications. This study analyses different types/systems of previous surgery and locations of scars and how they affect access difficulties. As modified access techniques to minimise risk of complications are under-reported the study details and evaluates them.
    METHODS: Prospectively collected data from consecutive LC and common bile duct explorations (LCBDE) performed by a single surgeon over 30 years was analysed. Previous abdominal surgery was documented and peri-operative outcomes were compared with patients who had no previous surgery using Chi-squared analysis.
    RESULTS: Of 5916 LC and LCBDE, 1846 patients (31.2%) had previous abdominal surgery. The median age was 60 years. Those with previous surgery required more frequent duodenal (RR 1.07; p = 0.023), hepatic flexure (RR 1.11; p = 0.043) and distal adhesiolysis (RR 3.57; p < 0.001) and had more access related bowel injuries (0.4% vs. 0.0%; p < 0.001). Previous upper gastrointestinal and biliary surgery had the highest rates of adhesiolysis (76.3%), difficult cystic pedicles (58.8%), fundus-first approach (7.2%), difficulty grades (64.9% Grades 3-5) and utilisation of abdominal drains (71.1%). Previous open surgery resulted in longer operative time compared to previous laparoscopic procedures (65vs.55 min; p < 0.001), increased difficulty of pedicle dissection (42.4% vs. 36.0%; p < 0.05) and required more duodenal, hepatic flexure and distant adhesiolysis (p < 0.05) and fundus-first dissection (4% vs 2%; p < 0.05). Epigastric and supraumbilical access and access through umbilical and other hernias were used in 163 patients (8.8%) with no bowel complications.
    CONCLUSIONS: The risks of access and adhesiolysis in patients with previous abdominal scars undergoing biliary surgery are dependent on the nature of previous surgery. Previous open, upper gastrointestinal and biliary surgery carried the most significant risks. Modified access techniques can be adopted to safely mitigate these risks.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号