■\"漂浮物,“所有年龄段的患者都有常见的抱怨,被用作查询术语,因为它影响了30%的搜索眼睛护理的人。美国眼科学会网站的“漂浮物”部分被用作问题和答案的来源(www。aao.org)。漂浮物是随着眼睛的移动而移动的视觉障碍。它们可能与视网膜脱离有关,这可能会导致视力丧失。随着大型语言模型(LLM)聊天机器人ChatGPT的出现,吟游诗人与虚拟助理(VA),GoogleAssistant,还有Alexa,我们分析了他们对“漂浮物”的反应。\"
■使用AAO.org,“公众和患者,“及其相关小节,\"EyeHealthA-Z\":Floaters和闪光灯链接,我们问了四个问题:(1)什么是漂浮物?(2)什么是闪光?(3)闪光和偏头痛?(4)漂浮物和闪光治疗?到ChatGPT,巴德,GoogleAssistant,Alexa如果突出显示,则识别美国眼科学会(AAO)关键字。美国教育部批准的“Flesch-Kincaid等级”公式,用于评估回答的阅读理解水平。
■对于聊天机器人和虚拟助手,GoogleAssistant是唯一使用“眼科医生”一词的人。“没有提到漂浮物的紧迫性或紧急性质。AAO.org显示出较低的读数水平与LLM和VA(p=.11)。ChatGPT的阅读理解水平,巴德,GoogleAssistant,Alexa更高(12.3、9.7、13.1、8.1级),高于AAO.org(7.3级)。LLM与VA的字数较高(p<.0286)。
■目前,ChatGPT,巴德,GoogleAssistant,和Alexa相似.存在事实信息,但所有人都错过了诊断视网膜脱离的紧迫性。翻译相关性:LLM和虚拟助手都是免费的,我们的患者将使用它们来获取“漂浮物”信息。ChatGPT可能存在遗漏错误,并且缺乏寻求医生护理的紧迫性。
UNASSIGNED: \"Floaters,\" a common complaint among patients of all ages, was used as a query term because it affects 30% of all people searching for eye care. The American Academy of Ophthalmology website\'s \"floaters\" section was used as a source for questions and answers (www.aao.org). Floaters is a visual obstruction that moves with the movement of the eye. They can be associated with retinal detachment, which can lead to vision loss. With the advent of large language model (LLM) chatbots ChatGPT, Bard versus virtual assistants (VA), Google Assistant, and Alexa, we analyzed their responses to \"floaters.\"
UNASSIGNED: Using AAO.org, \"Public & Patients,\" and its related subsection, \"EyeHealth A-Z\": Floaters and Flashes link, we asked four questions: (1) What are floaters? (2) What are flashes? (3) Flashes and Migraines? (4) Floaters and Flashes Treatment? to ChatGPT, Bard, Google Assistant, and Alexa. The American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) keywords were identified if they were highlighted. The \"Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level\" formula approved by the U.S. Department of Education, was used to evaluate the reading comprehension level for the responses.
UNASSIGNED: Of the chatbots and virtual assistants, Google Assistant is the only one that uses the term \"ophthalmologist.\" There is no mention of the urgency or emergency nature of floaters. AAO.org shows a lower reading level vs the LLMs and VA (p = .11). The reading comprehension levels of ChatGPT, Bard, Google Assistant, and Alexa are higher (12.3, 9.7, 13.1, 8.1 grade) vs the AAO.org (7.3 grade). There is a higher word count for LLMs vs VA (p < .0286).
UNASSIGNED: Currently, ChatGPT, Bard, Google Assistant, and Alexa are similar. Factual information is present but all miss the urgency of the diagnosis of a retinal detachment. Translational relevance: Both the LLM and virtual assistants are free and our patients will use them to obtain \"floaters\" information. There may be errors of omission with ChatGPT and a lack of urgency to seek a physician\'s care.