{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Evaluating the long-term outcomes from cochlear implant surgery for children with single and multiple additional needs.
{Author}: Raine CH;Gibbs A;Cordingley A;
{Journal}: Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol
{Volume}: 184
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 Sep 13
{Factor}: 1.626
{DOI}: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112068
{Abstract}: Cochlear implant surgery is a cornerstone in the treatment of severe to profound hearing impairment. Despite comprising a significant proportion of the deaf population, children with additional needs have only been included for cochlear implant candidacy in recent years. This paper aims to evaluate the long-term progress of children with additional needs post-implantation compared to children without additional and assess how this trend changes over time.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>This is a longitudinal cohort study comparing the outcomes between children with no additional needs, children with a single additional need, and children with multiple additional needs. The five outcome measures used assessed both auditory perception and expressive and receptive language. For each outcome measure, subjects were assessed pre implant and one-, three-, and five-years post-implant.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>The total cohort consisted of 334 subjects: 181 with no additional needs, 116 with a single additional need, and 37 with multiple additional needs. The results showed that children with additional needs performed significantly poorer in all outcome measures compared to those without additional needs, with a greater negative effect associated with multiple additional needs. In auditory perception, both additional needs groups increased in rate of progress over time, in contrast to language capabilities for which the rate plateaued at a significantly lower level than children without additional needs. Once again, both of these effects were greater for the multiple additional needs group.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>It is clear that there is reduced progress in children with additional needs compared to those without, and that the number of additional needs present is an important factor in this. Despite initial delays, it seems as though children with additional needs may catch up over time in auditory perception scores, however for language skills, this cohort may achieve limited scores even as time progresses. It is important to investigate this further to gauge the factors that are causing this discrepancy to see if any can be limited to maximise outcome.