{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Pitting Is Not Only a Measure of Oedema Presence: Using High-Frequency Ultrasound to Guide Pitting Test Standardisation for Assessment of Lymphoedema.
{Author}: Sanderson J;Tuttle N;Box R;Reul-Hirche H;Laakso EL;
{Journal}: Diagnostics (Basel)
{Volume}: 14
{Issue}: 15
{Year}: 2024 Jul 30
{Factor}: 3.992
{DOI}: 10.3390/diagnostics14151645
{Abstract}: The pitting qualities of lymphoedema tissue change with disease progression. However, little is known about the underlying tissue response to the pitting test or the tissue characteristics that enhance or resist indentation. The pitting test is currently unstandardised, and the influence of test technique on pitting outcomes is unknown. Understanding how tissue reacts to applied pressure will build evidence for the standardisation of the pitting test. Ninety pitting test sites from fifteen women with unilateral breast cancer-related lymphoedema were evaluated using high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS), bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS), and limb volume measures. Three sites on each lymphoedema and non-lymphoedema arm were subject to a 60-s (s) staged pitting test, with changes in tissue features captured with ultrasound imaging before, throughout, and after the pitting test. Pitting qualities of tissues varied greatly, with lymphoedema sites pitting more frequently (p < 0.001) with greater depth (p < 0.001) and requiring a longer recovery time (p = 0.002) than contralateral unaffected tissue. Pitting is not solely attributable to oedema volume. Non-structural and structural characteristics of dermal and subcutaneous layers also influence tissue responses to sustained pressure. To enhance the validity and reliability of pitting assessment, a 60 s staged pitting test with an observation of tissue recovery is recommended for lymphoedema presentations.