{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Influences on the Decision to Euthanize a Compromised Pig.
{Author}: Stoffregen J;Winkelmann T;Schneider B;Fehrmann M;Gerdes K;Miller M;Reinmold J;Hennig-Pauka I;Kemper N;Kleinsorgen C;Tölle KH;Kreienbrock L;Wendt M;Grosse Beilage E;
{Journal}: Animals (Basel)
{Volume}: 14
{Issue}: 15
{Year}: 2024 Jul 26
{Factor}: 3.231
{DOI}: 10.3390/ani14152174
{Abstract}: The decision to euthanize a compromised pig can be challenging for pig farmers and veterinarians. To understand more about the challenges in Germany, a cross-sectional online survey was conducted. Based on a hybrid design, the responses of 39 veterinarians and 62 pig farmers were analyzed to generate a list of common clinical signs associated with the euthanasia of sows, fatteners, and piglets. Moreover, a set of influences on the farm, due to economic and personal considerations, were found to shape the decision-making process. The two most salient reasons outlined for the delay of timely euthanasia were uncertainty and misinterpretation of the chance for healing. The lack of valid clinical signs or a sound justification was most frequently mentioned as a challenge to the general decision-making process. In summation, this study highlights the need to generate a valid taxonomy for clinical signs that includes their development in a compromised pig over time. Future studies should elaborate on the justification of euthanasia decisions to facilitate the resolution of ethical dilemmas among the involved pig farmers and veterinarians. Lastly, the results suggest that clinical reasoning and consultation skills should be included when decision-making behavior is to be trained.