{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: CAse-BAsed REview sTandards (CABARET): Considerations for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors.
{Author}: Benlidayi IC;Gupta L;
{Journal}: J Korean Med Sci
{Volume}: 39
{Issue}: 30
{Year}: 2024 Aug 5
{Factor}: 5.354
{DOI}: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e225
{Abstract}: The publication landscape for case reports has undergone a significant shift, with many high-impact journals deprioritizing or ceasing their publication altogether. This trend has led to the emergence of case-based reviews as an alternative to traditional case reports. Several factors drive this shift. Case-based reviews offer a more comprehensive synthesis of the literature compared to single case reports. They employ systematic search methodologies, reducing the risk of excluding relevant data, and providing robust evidence. From a publisher's perspective, case-based reviews have a greater potential for citation. While recommendations exist for writing traditional case reports, such as the CAse REports (CARE) guidelines, there is a lack of published recommendations for composing case-based reviews. This review aims to address this gap by providing guidance on drafting high-quality case-based reviews.