{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Hypertension evaluation and management in new young patients: are we doing our female patients a disservice?
{Author}: Greenlees C;Hosseinzadeh S;Delles C;McGinnigle E;
{Journal}: Blood Press
{Volume}: 33
{Issue}: 1
{Year}: 2024 Dec
{Factor}: 1.771
{DOI}: 10.1080/08037051.2024.2387909
{Abstract}: <B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one of the leading causes of death in women, largely underpinned by hypertension. Current guidelines recommend first-line therapy with a RAAS-blocking agent especially in young people. There are well documented sex disparities in CVD outcomes and management. We evaluate the management of patients with newly diagnosed hypertension in a tertiary care clinic to assess male-female differences in investigation and treatment.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Clinic letters of all new patients under the age of 51 attending the Glasgow Blood Pressure Clinic between January and December 2023 were reviewed. The primary outcomes measured were first-line treatment choices, deviations from guideline-recommended treatment, investigations for secondary hypertension, and documentation of female-specific risk factors and family planning advice. Secondary outcomes included clinical characteristics such as systolic and diastolic blood pressure at referral and at the new patient appointment, age at diagnosis, age at first appointment, and the number of antihypertensive drugs prescribed at referral.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>One hundred and five (59:46, M:F) new patient encounters were reviewed after sixteen exclusions for non-attendance and inappropriate clinic coding. Choice of first line antihypertensive agent did not vary between sexes with no deviation from guideline-recommended medical therapy. Men, however, had more biochemical investigations conducted for secondary causes across all ages. This was greatest in those under 40 years old. There was suboptimal documentation of female-specific risk factors (obstetric and gynaecological history), contraceptive drug history and family planning with 35%, 20%, and 15.6%, respectively.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>In 2023, women under 51 years of age seen in a tertiary care hypertension clinic received similar first-line treatment to their male peers. However, relevant female-specific histories were suboptimally documented for these patients. Whilst therapeutic approaches in men and women appear to be similar in this clinic, there are opportunities to improve CVD prevention in women, even in a specialised clinic setting.<BR>Hypertension, or persistent high blood pressure, is a condition that can lead to serious cardiovascular diseases such as stroke and heart failure. Evidence has shown that women have cardiovascular disease more than men and it is the leading cause of death in women in Europe. To understand how male and female patients are treated for hypertension, we examined documented consultations and treatments of 105 patients under the age of 51 (46 women and 59 men) at a Glasgow hypertension clinic in 2023. We found that men had more investigations for specific causes of their hypertension across all ages (men = 88%, women = 61%). Recording of reproductive history (35%), contraceptive drug history (20%) and advice on family planning (15.6%) was not as thorough as they could be. Incorrect management of female reproductive history and contraceptive drug history can increase the risk of long-term hypertension complications, so managing this is crucial. A class of drugs commonly used to manage hypertension called RAAS blockers are dangerous to the foetus when pregnant - another factor to consider when managing young women with high blood pressure. Overall, these findings mean that there may be a need for more thorough consideration of women’s health factors in hypertension treatment. By paying attention to these areas, we can enhance long-term cardiovascular health for women.