{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Dye-less quantification of tissue perfusion by laser speckle contrast imaging is equivalent to quantified indocyanine green in a porcine model.
{Author}: Skinner GC;Marois M;Oberlin J;McCulloh CJ;Schwaitzberg SD;Kim PC;
{Journal}: Surg Endosc
{Volume}: 0
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 Jul 29
{Factor}: 3.453
{DOI}: 10.1007/s00464-024-11061-w
{Abstract}: BACKGROUND: Subjective surgeon interpretation of near-infrared perfusion video is limited by low inter-observer agreement and poor correlation to clinical outcomes. In contrast, quantification of indocyanine green fluorescence video (Q-ICG) correlates with histologic level of perfusion as well as clinical outcomes. Measuring dye volume over time, however, has limitations, such as it is not on-demand, has poor spatial resolution, and is not easily repeatable. Laser speckle contrast imaging quantification (Q-LSCI) is a real-time, dye-free alternative, but further validation is needed. We hypothesize that Q-LSCI will distinguish ischemic tissue and correlate over a range of perfusion levels equivalent to Q-ICG.
METHODS: Nine sections of intestine in three swine were devascularized. Pairs of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging and laser speckle contrast imaging video were quantified within perfused, watershed, and ischemic regions. Q-ICG used normalized peak inflow slope. Q-LSCI methods were laser speckle perfusion units (LSPU), the base unit of laser speckle imaging, relative perfusion units (RPU), a previously described methodology which utilizes an internal control, and zero-lag normalized cross-correlation (X-Corr), to investigate if the signal deviations convey accurate perfusion information. We determine the ability to distinguish ischemic regions and correlation to Q-ICG over a perfusion gradient.
RESULTS: All modalities distinguished ischemic from perfused regions of interest; Q-ICG values of 0.028 and 0.155 (p < 0.001); RPU values of 0.15 and 0.68 (p < 0.001); and X-corr values of 0.73 and 0.24 (p < 0.001). Over a range of perfusion levels, RPU had the best correlation with Q-ICG (r = 0.79, p < 0.001) compared with LSPU (r = 0.74, p < 0.001) and X-Corr (r = 0.46, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that Q-LSCI discriminates ischemic from perfused tissue and represents similar perfusion information over a broad range of perfusion levels comparable to clinically validated Q-ICG. This suggests that Q-LSCI might offer clinically predictive real-time dye-free quantification of tissue perfusion. Further work should include validation in histologic studies and human clinical trials.