{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Unnecessary care in orthopaedic surgery.
{Author}: Boyle AB;Harris IA;
{Journal}: ANZ J Surg
{Volume}: 0
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 Jul 25
{Factor}: 2.025
{DOI}: 10.1111/ans.19171
{Abstract}: Unnecessary care, where the potential for harm exceeds the potential for benefit, is widespread in medical care. Orthopaedic surgery is no exception. This has significant implications for patient safety and health care expenditure. This narrative review explores unnecessary care in orthopaedic surgery. There is wide geographic variation in orthopaedic surgical practice that cannot be explained by differences in local patient populations. Furthermore, many orthopaedic interventions lack adequate low-bias evidence to support their use. Quantifying the size of the problem is difficult, but the economic burden and morbidity associated with unnecessary care is likely to be significant. An evidence gap, evidence-practice gap, cognitive biases, and health system factors all contribute to unnecessary care in orthopaedic surgery. Unnecessary care is harming patients and incurring high costs. Solutions include increasing awareness of the problem, aligning financial incentives to high value care and away from low value care, and demanding low bias evidence where none exists.