{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Comparison of Depth-Related Visuomotor Task Performance in Uniocular Individuals and in Binocular Controls With and Without Temporary Monocular Occlusion.
{Author}: Devi P;Solomon JA;Tyler CW;Dave TV;Kaliki S;Bharadwaj SR;
{Journal}: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
{Volume}: 65
{Issue}: 8
{Year}: 2024 Jul 1
{Factor}: 4.925
{DOI}: 10.1167/iovs.65.8.32
{Abstract}: <B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Do one-eyed (uniocular) humans use monocular depth cues differently from those with intact binocularity to perform depth-related visuomotor tasks that emulate complex activities of daily living? If so, does performance depend on the participant's age, duration of uniocularity and head movements?<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Forty-five uniocular cases (age range 6-37 years; 2.4 months-31.0 years of uniocularity) and 46 age-similar binocular controls performed a task that required them to pass a hoop around an electrified wire convoluted in depth multiple times, while avoiding contact as indicated by auditory feedback. The task was performed with and without head restraint, in random order. The error rate and speed were calculated from the frequency of contact between the hoop and wire and the total task duration (adjusting for error time), respectively, all determined from video recordings of the task. Head movements were analyzed from the videos using face-tracking software.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Error rate decreased with age (P < 0.001) until the late teen years while speed revealed no such trend. Across all ages, the error rate increased and speed decreased in the absence of binocularity (P < 0.001). There was no additional error reduction with duration of uniocularity (P = 0.16). Head movements provided no advantage to task performance, despite generating parallax disparities comparable to binocular viewing.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Performance in a dynamic, depth-related visuomotor task is reduced in the absence of binocular viewing, independent of age-related performance level. This study finds no evidence for a prolonged experience with monocular depth cues being advantageous for such tasks over transient loss of binocularity.