{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Application of High-Dimensional Propensity Score Methods to the National Health and Aging Trends Study.
{Author}: Hamedani AG;Pham Nguyen TP;Willis AW;Tazare JR;
{Journal}: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci
{Volume}: 79
{Issue}: 9
{Year}: 2024 Sep 1
{Factor}: 6.591
{DOI}: 10.1093/gerona/glae178
{Abstract}: <B>BACKGROUND: </B>High-dimensional propensity scoring (HDPS) is a method for empirically identifying potential confounders within large healthcare databases such as administrative claims data. However, this method has not yet been applied to large national health surveys such as the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), an ongoing nationally representative survey of older adults in the United States and important resource in gerontology research.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>In this Research Practice article, we present an overview of HDPS and describe the specific data transformation steps and analytic considerations needed to apply it to national health surveys. We applied HDPS within NHATS to investigate the association between self-reported visual difficulty and incident dementia, comparing HDPS to conventional confounder selection methods.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Among 7 207 dementia-free NHATS Wave 1 respondents, 528 (7.3%) had self-reported visual difficulty. In an unadjusted discrete time proportional hazards model accounting for the complex survey design of NHATS, self-reported visual difficulty was strongly associated with incident dementia (odds ratio [OR] 2.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.95-2.81). After adjustment for standard investigator-selected covariates via inverse probability weighting, the magnitude of this association decreased, but evidence of an association remained (OR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.11-1.85). Adding 75 HDPS-prioritized variables to the investigator-selected propensity score model resulted in further attenuation of the association between visual impairment and dementia (OR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.70-1.23).<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>HDPS can be successfully applied to national health surveys such as NHATS and may improve confounder adjustment. We hope developing this framework will encourage future consideration of HDPS in this setting.