{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Meta-analysis of the value of dual-energy computed tomography in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee.
{Author}: Lin Q;Wu J;Qiu S;
{Journal}: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
{Volume}: 25
{Issue}: 1
{Year}: 2024 Jul 18
{Factor}: 2.562
{DOI}: 10.1186/s12891-024-07632-6
{Abstract}: BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries.
METHODS: The literature search was performed up to December 8, 2023, and included a comprehensive examination of several databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP. Diagnostic metrics sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) were determined using a bivariate model analysis. Heterogeneity within the data was explored through subgroup analyses, which considered variables including geographical region, use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), arthroscopy, and study design.
RESULTS: The analysis included ten studies encompassing 544 patients. DECT demonstrated substantial diagnostic utility for ACL injuries of the knee, with a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88-0.94), a specificity of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81-0.95), a PLR of 9.20 (95% CI: 4.50-19.00), a NLR of 0.10 (95% CI: 0.06-0.14), a DOR of 97.00 (95% CI: 35.00-268.00), and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97). The subgroup analyses consistently showed high diagnostic precision for ACL injuries across Asian population (sensitivity: 0.91, specificity: 0.91, PLR: 9.90, NLR: 0.09, DOR: 105.00, AUC: 0.96), in MRI subgroup (sensitivity: 0.85, specificity: 0.94, PLR: 9.57, NLR: 0.18, DOR: 56.00, AUC: 0.93), in arthroscopy subgroup (sensitivity: 0.92, specificity: 0.89, PLR: 8.40, NLR: 0.09, DOR: 94.00, AUC: 0.95), for prospective studies (sensitivity: 0.92, specificity: 0.88, PLR: 7.40, NLR: 0.09, DOR: 78.00, AUC: 0.95), and for retrospective studies (sensitivity: 0.91, specificity: 0.93, AUC: 0.93).
CONCLUSIONS: DECT exhibits a high value in diagnosing ACL injuries. The significant diagnostic value of DECT provides clinicians with a powerful tool that enhances the accuracy and efficiency of diagnosis and optimizes patient management and treatment outcomes.