{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Marginal integrity of prototype bioactive glass-doped resin composites in class II cavities.
{Author}: Mohn N;Par M;Gubler A;Tauböck TT;
{Journal}: Clin Oral Investig
{Volume}: 28
{Issue}: 8
{Year}: 2024 Jul 16
{Factor}: 3.606
{DOI}: 10.1007/s00784-024-05824-x
{Abstract}: <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>This in vitro study examined the marginal integrity of experimental composite materials doped with bioactive glass (BG).<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Class-II MOD cavities were prepared and restored with one of the following composite materials: a commercial composite material as a reference (Filtek Supreme XTE), an experimental composite doped with BG 45S5 (C-20), and an experimental composite doped with a fluoride-containing BG (F-20). Six experimental groups (n = 8) were used, as each of the three composites was applied with (+) or without (-) a universal adhesive (Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose). All specimens were subjected to thermocycling (10,000 x, 5-55 °C) and then additionally stored in artificial saliva for eight weeks. Scanning electron micrographs of the mesial and the distal box were taken at three time points (initial, after thermocycling, and after eight weeks of storage in artificial saliva). The margins were classified as "continuous" and "non-continuous" and the percentage of continuous margins (PCM) was statistically analyzed (α = 0.05).<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>In most experimental groups, thermocycling led to a significant decrease in PCM, while the additional 8-week aging had no significant effect. F-20 + performed significantly better (p = 0.005) after 8 weeks storage in artificial saliva than the reference material with adhesive, while no statistically significant differences were observed at the other two time points. C-20 + exhibited significantly better PCM than the reference material with adhesive after thermocycling (p = 0.026) and after 8 weeks (p = 0.003).<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Overall, the experimental composites with BG showed at least as good marginal adaptation as the commercial reference, with an indication of possible re-sealing of marginal gaps.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Maintaining or improving the marginal integrity of composite restorations is important to prevent microleakage and its likely consequences such as pulp irritation and secondary caries.