{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Evaluation of Facial Asymmetry in Patients with Crooked Nose.
{Author}: Eroğlu E;Pamuk AE;Yücel ÖT;
{Journal}: Aesthetic Plast Surg
{Volume}: 0
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 Jul 15
{Factor}: 2.708
{DOI}: 10.1007/s00266-024-04235-3
{Abstract}: <B>BACKGROUND: </B>This study aims to explore the correlation between facial asymmetry and a crooked nose using objective methodologies.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>The cohort of 57 patients who underwent septorhinoplasty surgery for aesthetic reasons between 2019 and 2022. Patients were categorized based on the type of nasal axis deviation. The analysis involved reviewing patients' photographs and cone beam computed tomography images. We identified various anatomical landmarks and compared measurements across the groups.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Among the study population, 21 (36.8%) exhibited Type-I (linear) and 15 (26.3%) demonstrated Type-C nasal axis deviation, while no deviation was detected in 21 (36.8%) patients. Upon evaluating the upper face area, significant differences were found in the glabella-lateral orbit (G-LO) and rhinion-lateral orbit (Rh-LO) parameters (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). A statistically significant difference was discovered in all three parameters between the three groups in the middle face area [glabella-zygion (G-Zy) p = 0.04, rhinion-zygion (Rh-Zy) P < 0.001, anterior nasal spine-zygion (ANS-Zy) p < 0.001)]. Further, a statistically significant difference was noted in the soft tissue parameters gonion (Go) and LO (p = 0.008 and P = 0.005, respectively).<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Patients with crooked noses, in particular, exhibit asymmetries in the upper and middle faces. The glabella in the upper face and the anterior nasal spine in the middle face are stable points, and the fact that the parameters derived from these two reference points are significant, when considered in conjunction with other significant parameters, strongly supports the aforementioned statement.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .