{Reference Type}: Journal Article {Title}: Anisodamine for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a pilot systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. {Author}: Jain H;Odat RM;Jain J;Dey D;Hussein AM;Marsool MDM;Shahbaz H;Mathur A;Yadav H;Passey S;Yadav R; {Journal}: Ann Med Surg (Lond) {Volume}: 86 {Issue}: 7 {Year}: 2024 Jul 暂无{DOI}: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002181 {Abstract}: UNASSIGNED: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a common post-procedural complication of percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Anisodamine hydrobromide is an alkaloid that has demonstrated efficacy in improving microcirculation. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the reno-protective effects of Anisodamine in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for AMI.
UNASSIGNED: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched from inception to January 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of Anisodamine in preventing the development of CIN. Outcomes of interest included the incidence of CIN, serum creatinine levels, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). A random-effects model was used for pooling standard mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% CI. Statistical significance was considered at a P less than 0.05.
UNASSIGNED: Three RCTs involving 563 patients were included. Anisodamine was associated with a reduction in the incidence of CIN [OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.69; P=0.0003], a reduction in serum creatinine levels at 48 [SMD: -6.78; 95% CI: -10.54,-3.02; P=0.0004] and 72 h [SMD: -6.74; 95% CI: -13.33,-0.15; P=0.03], and a higher eGFR at 24 [SMD: 5.77; 95% CI: 0.39, 11.14; P=0.03], and 48 h [SMD: 4.70; 95% CI: 2.03,7.38; P=0.0006]. The levels of serum creatinine at 24 h and eGFR value at 72 h were comparable between both groups.
UNASSIGNED: Anisodamine has demonstrated clinical efficacy in ameliorating the development of CIN post-PCI in AMI patients. Large, multi-centric RCTs are warranted to evaluate the robustness of these findings.