{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Complicated calcified alloplastic implants in the nasal dorsum: A clinical analysis.
{Author}: Hwang YS;Kim TK;Yang DJ;Jang SH;Lee DW;
{Journal}: World J Clin Cases
{Volume}: 12
{Issue}: 18
{Year}: 2024 Jun 26
{Factor}: 1.534
{DOI}: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i18.3351
{Abstract}: <B>BACKGROUND: </B>In rhinoplasty, calcification around silicone implants is frequently observed in the tip dorsum (TD) area. Additionally, based on a review of various literature, it is presumed that calcification in silicone implants occurs due to both inflammatory chemical reactions and physical friction against the tissue. The calcification of nasal silicone implants not only results in the functional loss of the implants, but also leads to material deformation. However, there is a lack of research on calcification of nasal silicone implants in the current literature.<BR><B>OBJECTIVE: </B>To elucidate various clinical characteristics of calcification around nasal silicone implants, using histological and radiological analysis.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>This study analyzed data from 16 patients of calcified nasal implants, who underwent revision rhinoplasty for various reasons after undergoing augmentation rhinoplasty with silicone implants. The collected data included information on implant duration, implant types, location of calcification, presence of inflammatory reactions, and computed tomography (CT) scans.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>The most common location of calcification, as visually analyzed, was in the TD area, accounting for 56%. Additionally, the analysis of CT scans revealed a trend of increasing Hounsfield Unit values for calcification with the duration of implantation, although this trend was not statistically significant (P = 0.139).<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Our study shows that reducing the frequency of calcification may be achievable by using softer silicone implants and by minimizing the damage to perioperative tissues.