{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Evaluation of the sentinel yellow fever surveillance system in Uganda, 2017-2022: strengths and weaknesses.
{Author}: Wanyana MW;King P;Migisha R;Kwesiga B;Okello PE;Kadobera D;Bulage L;Kayiwa J;Nankya AM;Ario AR;Harris JR;
{Journal}: BMC Infect Dis
{Volume}: 24
{Issue}: 1
{Year}: 2024 Jul 9
{Factor}: 3.667
{DOI}: 10.1186/s12879-024-09580-x
{Abstract}: <B>BACKGROUND: </B>Uganda has a sentinel surveillance system in seven high-risk sites to monitor yellow fever (YF) patterns and detect outbreaks. We evaluated the performance of this system from 2017 to 2022.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>We evaluated selected attributes, including timeliness (lags between different critical time points), external completeness (proportion of expected sentinel sites reporting ≥ 1 suspect case in the system annually), and internal completeness (proportion of reports with the minimum required data elements filled), using secondary data in the YF surveillance database from January 2017-July 2022. We conducted key informant interviews with stakeholders at health facility and national level to assess usefulness, flexibility, simplicity, and acceptability of the surveillance system.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>In total, 3,073 suspected and 15 confirmed YF cases were reported. The median time lag from sample collection to laboratory shipment was 37 days (IQR:21-54). External completeness was 76%; internal completeness was 65%. Stakeholders felt that the surveillance system was simple and acceptable, but were uncertain about flexibility. Most (71%) YF cases in previous outbreaks were detected through the sentinel surveillance system; data were used to inform interventions such as intensified YF vaccination.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>The YF sentinel surveillance system was useful in detecting outbreaks and informing public health action. Delays in case confirmation and incomplete data compromised its overall effectiveness and efficiency.