{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Intrasaccular Flow Disruption: Examining Global Access and Research Trends.
{Author}: Patel SA;Vivanco-Suarez J;Palepu C;Chisvo NS;Patel S;Gajjar AA;Woodiwiss T;Burkhardt JK;Srinivasan VM;
{Journal}: World Neurosurg
{Volume}: 189
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 Sep 5
{Factor}: 2.21
{DOI}: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.07.003
{Abstract}: The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) and other intrasaccular flow disruptors show promise in treating intracranial aneurysms. We performed a bibliometric analysis to provide novel insights into the trends and trajectory of these devices. We systematically assessed bibliometric data such as citations, journals, study designs, open access status, and multi-institutional involvement for the top-cited articles on WEB and other disruptors. The top 100 cited studies on the WEB had citations from 7 to 144 (mean ± standard deviation 35.6 ± 29.5), while only 33 studies were published for other intrasaccular flow disruptors (4.24 ± 8.45). Of the other devices, the Contour has the most publications (n = 21). Retrospective reviews were the most common study design for both WEB and other intrasaccular devices. France published the most studies in the top 100 WEB papers (n = 35), while Germany led for other flow disruptors (n = 10). In all studies analyzed, no senior authors from Africa are present. The top 100 WEB publications had a higher mean citation count (35.6 vs. 4.24, P<0.001), higher mean citations per year (5.24 vs. 1.03, P<0.01), and a higher proportion of multi-institutional collaborations (44.0% vs. 12.1%, P<0.01) than other intrasaccular flow disruptors. In conclusion, countries with the most publications on WEB are not necessarily the ones leading the way with newer intrasaccular devices, while study designs remain similar. There is a limited contribution to the literature outside of Europe and North America. Our findings identify notable collaborators and trends, providing a snapshot of the field and a roadmap for future research.