{Reference Type}: Systematic Review
{Title}: Nasogastric tube versus postpyloric tube feeding for critical illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
{Author}: Li L;Huang J;
{Journal}: Asia Pac J Clin Nutr
{Volume}: 33
{Issue}: 3
{Year}: 2024 Sep
{Factor}: 1.322
{DOI}: 10.6133/apjcn.202409_33(3).0001
{Abstract}: <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>Gastric tube feeding and postpyloric tube feeding are two common forms of enteral nutrition in critically ill patients. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of gastric tube feeding with that of postpyloric tube feeding in critically ill patients.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for eligible trials from their inception until March 2023. Relative risks (RRs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to estimate categorical and continuous outcomes using the random-effects model.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Sixteen trials involving 1,329 critically ill patients were selected for the final meta-analysis. Overall, we noted that gastric tube feeding showed no significant difference from post-pyloric tube feeding in mortality (p = 0.891), whereas the risk of pneumonia was significantly increased in patients who received gastric tube feeding (RR: 1.45; p = 0.021). Furthermore, we noted that gastric tube feeding was associated with a shorter time required to start feeding (WMD: -11.05; p = 0.007).<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>This research revealed that initiating feeding through the gastric tube required less time compared to postpyloric tube feeding. However, it was also associated with a heightened risk of pneumonia among critically ill patients.