{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: A mixed methods process evaluation: understanding the implementation and delivery of HIV prevention services integrated within sexual reproductive health (SRH) with or without peer support amongst adolescents and young adults in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
{Author}: Zuma T;Busang J;Hlongwane S;Chidumwa G;Gumede D;Luthuli M;Dreyer J;Herbst C;Okesola N;Chimbindi N;McGrath N;Sherr L;Seeley J;Shahmanesh M;
{Journal}: Trials
{Volume}: 25
{Issue}: 1
{Year}: 2024 Jul 3
{Factor}: 2.728
{DOI}: 10.1186/s13063-024-08279-3
{Abstract}: <B>BACKGROUND: </B>Combination prevention interventions, when integrated with community-based support, have been shown to be particularly beneficial to adolescent and young peoples' sexual and reproductive health. Between 2020 and 2022, the Africa Health Research Institute in rural South Africa conducted a 2 × 2 randomised factorial trial among young people aged 16-29 years old (Isisekelo Sempilo) to evaluate whether integrated HIV and sexual and reproductive health (HIV/SRH) with or without peer support will optimise delivery of HIV prevention and care. Using mixed methods, we conducted a process evaluation to provide insights to and describe the implementation of a community-based peer-led HIV care and prevention intervention targeting adolescents and young people.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>The process evaluation was conducted in accordance with the Medical Research Council guidelines using quantitative and qualitative approaches. Self-completed surveys and clinic and programmatic data were used to quantify the uptake of each component of the intervention and to understand intervention fidelity and reach. In-depth individual interviews were used to understand intervention experiences. Baseline sociodemographic factors were summarised for each trial arm, and proportions of participants who accepted and actively engaged in various components of the intervention as well as those who successfully linked to care were calculated. Qualitative data were thematically analysed.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>The intervention was feasible and acceptable to young people and intervention implementing teams. In particular, the STI testing and SRH components of the intervention were popular. The main challenges with the peer support implementation were due to fidelity, mainly because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The study found that it was important to incorporate familial support into interventions for young people's sexual health. Moreover, it was found that psychological and social support was an essential component to combination HIV prevention packages for young people.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>The results demonstrated that peer-led community-based care that integrates SRH services with HIV is a versatile model to decentralise health and social care. The family could be a platform to target restrictive gender and sexual norms, by challenging not only attitudes and behaviours related to gender among young people but also the gendered structures that surround them.