{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Effects of home-based neurostimulation on outcomes after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
{Author}: Abdullahi A;Wong TWL;Ng SSM;
{Journal}: Neurol Sci
{Volume}: 0
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 Jun 28
{Factor}: 3.83
{DOI}: 10.1007/s10072-024-07633-2
{Abstract}: <B>BACKGROUND: </B>Home-based rehabilitation is a cost-effective means of making services available for patients. The aim of this study is to determine the evidence in the literature on the effects of home-based neurostimulation in patients with stroke.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>We searched PubMED, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials on the subject matter using keywords such as stroke, electrical stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation. Information on participants' characteristics and mean scores on the outcomes of interest were extracted. Risks of bias and methodological quality of the included studies were assessed using Cochrane Risks of bias tool and PEDro scale respectively. The data was analyzed using both narrative and quantitative syntheses. In the quantitative synthesis, meta-analysis was carried out using random effect model analysis.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>The results showed that, home-based neurostimulation is superior to the control at improving upper limb muscle strength (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.08 to 1.32, p = 0.03), functional mobility (SMD = -0.39, 95% CI = -0.65 to 0.14, p = 0.003) and walking endurance (SMD = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.59, p = 0.01) post intervention; and upper limb motor function (SMD = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.10 to 1.70, p = 0.03), functional mobility (SMD = -0.30, 95% CI = -0.56 to -0.05, p = 0.02) and walking endurance (SMD = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.59, p = 0.01) at follow-up.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Home-based neurostimulation can be used to improve upper and lower limb function after stroke.