{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Accuracy of immediately placed implants using surgical guides from different 3-dimensional printers: An in vitro study.
{Author}: Pitman J;Cosyn J;Christiaens V;Younes F;de Bruyckere T;Vervaeke S;Glibert M;
{Journal}: Clin Implant Dent Relat Res
{Volume}: 0
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 Jun 26
{Factor}: 4.259
{DOI}: 10.1111/cid.13354
{Abstract}: <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D)-printed surgical guides for fully guided immediate implants from different manufacturers.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Eighteen 3D printed fully guided surgical guides (split into 3 groups [n = 6] according to their manufacturer: Company, Desktop, or Lab), were used to place 72 implants (n = 24) in identical maxillary models. After placement, the mean global, angular, mesiodistal, buccopalatal, and vertical deviation at the platform and apex of the placed implants, relative to their preoperatively planned positions, was calculated.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Significant differences in global apex deviation, angular deviation, mesiodistal apex deviation, and vertical platform and apex deviation were found between the Lab and Desktop groups (p ≤ 0.007). Significant differences in mesiodistal platform and apex deviation and buccopalatal apex deviation were also found between the Company and Desktop groups (p ≤ 0.005). Finally, significant differences in buccopalatal apex deviation, and vertical platform and apex deviation were found between the Company and Lab groups (p ≤ 0.003). Mean differences between guide groups across all parameters never exceeded 0.5 mm or 1°.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>The choice of 3D printer has a significant effect on the accuracy of fully guided immediate implants. However, the clinical relevance of these differences may be considered limited.