{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Investigating Stability in Subgroup Identification for Stratified Medicine.
{Author}: Hair GM;Jemielita T;Mt-Isa S;Schnell PM;Baumgartner R;
{Journal}: Pharm Stat
{Volume}: 0
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 Jun 25
{Factor}: 1.234
{DOI}: 10.1002/pst.2409
{Abstract}: Subgroup analysis may be used to investigate treatment effect heterogeneity among subsets of the study population defined by baseline characteristics. Several methodologies have been proposed in recent years and with these, statistical issues such as multiplicity, complexity, and selection bias have been widely discussed. Some methods adjust for one or more of these issues; however, few of them discuss or consider the stability of the subgroup assignments. We propose exploring the stability of subgroups as a sensitivity analysis step for stratified medicine to assess the robustness of the identified subgroups besides identifying possible factors that may drive this instability. After applying Bayesian credible subgroups, a nonparametric bootstrap can be used to assess stability at subgroup-level and patient-level. Our findings illustrate that when the treatment effect is small or not so evident, patients are more likely to switch to different subgroups (jumpers) across bootstrap resamples. In contrast, when the treatment effect is large or extremely convincing, patients generally remain in the same subgroup. While the proposed subgroup stability method is illustrated through Bayesian credible subgroups method on time-to-event data, this general approach can be used with other subgroup identification methods and endpoints.