{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Molecular Endotypes of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Latent Class Analysis of Two Multicenter Observational Cohorts.
{Author}: Maddali MV;Moore AR;Sinha P;Newton CA;Kim JS;Adegunsoye A;Ma SF;Strek ME;Chen CH;Linderholm AL;Zemans RL;Moore BB;Wolters PJ;Martinez FJ;Rogers AJ;Raj R;Noth I;Oldham JM;
{Journal}: Am J Respir Crit Care Med
{Volume}: 210
{Issue}: 4
{Year}: 2024 Aug 15
{Factor}: 30.528
{DOI}: 10.1164/rccm.202402-0339OC
{Abstract}: Rationale: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) causes irreversible fibrosis of the lung parenchyma. Although antifibrotic therapy can slow IPF progression, treatment response is variable. There exists a critical need to develop a precision medicine approach to IPF. Objectives: To identify and validate biologically driven molecular endotypes of IPF. Methods: Latent class analysis (LCA) was independently performed in prospectively recruited discovery (n = 875) and validation (n = 347) cohorts. Twenty-five plasma biomarkers associated with fibrogenesis served as class-defining variables. The association between molecular endotype and 4-year transplant-free survival was tested using multivariable Cox regression adjusted for baseline confounders. Endotype-dependent differential treatment response to future antifibrotic exposure was then assessed in a pooled cohort of patients naive to antifibrotic therapy at the time of biomarker measurement (n = 555). Measurements and Main Results: LCA independently identified two latent classes in both cohorts (P < 0.0001). WFDC2 (WAP four-disulfide core domain protein 2) was the most important determinant of class membership across cohorts. Membership in class 2 was characterized by higher biomarker concentrations and a higher risk of death or transplant (discovery, hazard ratio [HR], 2.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64-2.48; P < 0.001; validation, HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.34-2.82; P < 0.001). In pooled analysis, significant heterogeneity in treatment effect was observed between endotypes (P = 0.030 for interaction), with a favorable antifibrotic response in class 2 (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.93; P = 0.018) but not in class 1 (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.77-1.84; P = 0.422). Conclusions: In this multicohort study, we identified two novel molecular endotypes of IPF with divergent clinical outcomes and responses to antifibrotic therapy. Pending further validation, these endotypes could enable a precision medicine approach for future IPF clinical trials.