{Reference Type}: Journal Article {Title}: Comparison of the effect of two recruitment manoeuvres to conventional ventilation on lung atelectasis in paediatric laparoscopic surgery- a prospective randomised controlled trial. {Author}: Jain A;Bhardwaj N;Yaddanapudi S;Sen IM;Mathew P; {Journal}: BMC Anesthesiol {Volume}: 24 {Issue}: 1 {Year}: 2024 Jun 22 {Factor}: 2.376 {DOI}: 10.1186/s12871-024-02596-5 {Abstract}: BACKGROUND: There is a high incidence of pulmonary atelectasis during paediatric laparoscopic surgeries. The authors hypothesised that utilising a recruitment manoeuvre or using continuous positive airway pressure may prevent atelectasis compared to conventional ventilation.
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to compare the degree of lung atelectasis diagnosed by lung ultrasound (LUS) using three different ventilation techniques in children undergoing laparoscopic surgeries.
METHODS: Randomised, prospective three-arm trial.
METHODS: Single institute, tertiary care, teaching hospital.
METHODS: Children of ASA PS 1 and 2 up to the age of 10 years undergoing laparoscopic surgery with pneumoperitoneum lasting for more than 30 min.
METHODS: Random allocation to one of the three study groups: CG group: Inspiratory pressure adjusted to achieve a TV of 5-8 ml/kg, PEEP of 5 cm H2O, respiratory rate adjusted to maintain end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) between 30-40 mm Hg with manual ventilation and no PEEP at induction. RM group: A recruitment manoeuvre of providing a constant pressure of 30 cm H2O for ten seconds following intubation was applied. A PEEP of 10 cm H2O was maintained intraoperatively. CPAP group: Intraoperative maintenance with PEEP 10 cm H2O with CPAP of 10 cm H2O at induction using mechanical ventilation was done.
METHODS: Lung atelectasis score at closure assessed by LUS.
RESULTS: Post induction, LUS was comparable in all three groups. At the time of closure, the LUS for the RM group (8.6 ± 4.9) and the CPAP group (8.8 ± 6.8) were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than the CG group (13.3 ± 3.8). In CG and CPAP groups, the score at closure was significantly higher than post-induction. The PaO2/FiO2 ratio was significantly higher (p < 0.05) for the RM group (437.1 ± 44.9) and CPAP group (421.6 ± 57.5) than the CG group (361.3 ± 59.4) at the time of pneumoperitoneum.
CONCLUSIONS: Application of a recruitment manoeuvre post-intubation or CPAP during induction and maintenance with a high PEEP leads to less atelectasis than conventional ventilation during laparoscopic surgery in paediatric patients.
BACKGROUND: CTRI/2019/08/02058.