{Reference Type}: Journal Article {Title}: Lipid-lowering therapy with inclisiran in the real-world setting: Initial data from a national health care service. {Author}: Naoum I;Saliba W;Aker A;Zafrir B; {Journal}: J Clin Lipidol {Volume}: 0 {Issue}: 0 {Year}: 2024 May 24 {Factor}: 5.365 {DOI}: 10.1016/j.jacl.2024.05.003 {Abstract}: BACKGROUND: Inclisiran, a small-interfering RNA enabling long-term inhibition of PCSK9 synthesis, demonstrates good safety and efficacy profile in clinical trials. Real-world data on the potential to attain lipid-goals and reduce treatment gaps is lacking.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the implementation of inclisiran in real-world clinical setting.
METHODS: Data from a nationwide healthcare organization on patients initiating inclisiran between 3/2022-11/2023. Patients' characteristics, lipid-lowering therapies, post-treatment reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and attainment of treatment goals, were evaluated.
RESULTS: Inclisiran was initiated by 503 patients (57 % women; mean age 66±11 years). Cardiovascular disease was present in 54 %, and peak LDL-C levels >190 mg/dL documented in 64 %. Prior exposure to PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies was evident in 28 %. Lipid profile >2 months after filling first prescription, was available in 397 patients (347 with ≥2 injections). In patients treated by inclisiran only (n = 254), median LDL-C reduction from peak levels was 57 % (IQR, 48 %-67 %), and from pre-injection levels 40 % (19 %-54 %). In those with concomitant lipid-lowering therapies (n = 143), median LDL-C reduction from peak levels was 66 % (IQR, 55 %-73 %), and from pre-injection levels 46 % (23 %-59 %). LDL-C < 70 mg/dL was attained by 39 % and LDL-C < 55 mg/dL by 21.9 %. Of those treated with concomitant statin therapy, 38 % attained LDL-C < 55 mg/dL. Overall, 6.5 % discontinued inclisiran therapy after initial injection.
CONCLUSIONS: In real-world practice, inclisiran showed good efficacy in reducing LDL-C with high interindividual variability. However, attainment rates of lipid-goals were suboptimal due to limited use of combination lipid-lowering therapy and high-rates of severe hypercholesterolemia in our patient population cohort.