{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation and neuronavigation for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
{Author}: Valter Y;Rapallo F;Burlando B;Crossen M;Baeken C;Datta A;Deblieck C;
{Journal}: Expert Rev Med Devices
{Volume}: 0
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 Jun 26
{Factor}: 3.439
{DOI}: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2370820
{Abstract}: <B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are increasingly used for major depressive disorder (MDD). Most tDCS and rTMS studies target the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, either with or without neuronavigation. We examined the effect of rTMS and tDCS, and the added value of neuronavigation in the treatment of MDD.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>A search on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for rTMS or tDCS randomized controlled trials of MDD up to 1 February 2023, yielded 89 studies. We then performed meta-analyses comparing tDCS efficacy to non-neuronavigated rTMS, tDCS to neuronavigated rTMS, and neuronavigated rTMS to non-neuronavigated rTMS. We assessed the significance of the effect in subgroups and in the whole meta-analysis with a z-test and subgroup differences with a chi-square test.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>We found small-to-medium effects of both tDCS and rTMS on MDD, with a slightly greater effect from rTMS. No significant difference was found between neuronavigation and non-neuronavigation.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Although both tDCS and rTMS are effective in treating MDD, many patients do not respond. Additionally, current neuronavigation methods are not significantly improving MDD treatment. It is therefore imperative to seek personalized methods for these interventions.