{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Management and outcomes of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in trisomy 21 patients vs. non-trisomy 21 patients within a paediatric population: a 5-year follow-up.
{Author}: Fenech MT;Raj A;Dodeja R;Yeo D;
{Journal}: Orbit
{Volume}: 0
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 Jun 19
暂无{DOI}: 10.1080/01676830.2024.2365830
{Abstract}: <B>UNASSIGNED: </B>To assess the management of patients with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) in a paediatric population and review the long-term outcomes over a 5-year interval, with particular emphasis on the difference between patients with trisomy 21 and those without trisomy 21.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>This single-centre, retrospective, cross-sectional, case review study included patients suffering from CNLDO at Alder Hey Children's Hospital NHS foundation Trust. Patients were divided into two groups: Non-trisomy 21 and trisomy 21. Patients were followed-up for a 60-month interval. Patients aged <12 months at the time of surgery, patients with <60 months of follow-up data and patients with acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction were excluded. The main outcome measures were discharge rates in patients undertaking primary intervention with syringe and probe (S&P), number of patients requiring further treatment with lacrimal intubation or dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) and overall symptom-free periods post-treatment.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Ninety-three patients (142 eyes) were included. The mean number of surgical interventions was 1.53 ± 0.65. The mean interval between the 1st and 2nd intervention was 15.54 ± 16.33 months. There was a trend towards greater success rates non-trisomy 21 patients versus patients with trisomy 21 (p = 0.1352). The average symptom-free period after the final intervention was 44.31 ± 20.68 months, significantly longer in the non-trisomy 21 group compared to the trisomy 21 group (p = 0.0074).<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>The overall success rate after primary S&P was 55.9%. Our results suggest that in trisomy 21 patients suffering from CNLDO, a one-stage intervention with primary monocanalicular intubation should be considered instead of sequential approach.