{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: ChatGPT-3.5 passes Poland's medical final examination-Is it possible for ChatGPT to become a doctor in Poland?
{Author}: Suwała S;Szulc P;Guzowski C;Kamińska B;Dorobiała J;Wojciechowska K;Berska M;Kubicka O;Kosturkiewicz O;Kosztulska B;Rajewska A;Junik R;
{Journal}: SAGE Open Med
{Volume}: 12
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024
暂无{DOI}: 10.1177/20503121241257777
{Abstract}: <B>UNASSIGNED: </B>ChatGPT is an advanced chatbot based on Large Language Model that has the ability to answer questions. Undoubtedly, ChatGPT is capable of transforming communication, education, and customer support; however, can it play the role of a doctor? In Poland, prior to obtaining a medical diploma, candidates must successfully pass the Medical Final Examination.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>The purpose of this research was to determine how well ChatGPT performed on the Polish Medical Final Examination, which passing is required to become a doctor in Poland (an exam is considered passed if at least 56% of the tasks are answered correctly). A total of 2138 categorized Medical Final Examination questions (from 11 examination sessions held between 2013-2015 and 2021-2023) were presented to ChatGPT-3.5 from 19 to 26 May 2023. For further analysis, the questions were divided into quintiles based on difficulty and duration, as well as question types (simple A-type or complex K-type). The answers provided by ChatGPT were compared to the official answer key, reviewed for any changes resulting from the advancement of medical knowledge.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>ChatGPT correctly answered 53.4%-64.9% of questions. In 8 out of 11 exam sessions, ChatGPT achieved the scores required to successfully pass the examination (60%). The correlation between the efficacy of artificial intelligence and the level of complexity, difficulty, and length of a question was found to be negative. AI outperformed humans in one category: psychiatry (77.18% vs. 70.25%, p = 0.081).<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>The performance of artificial intelligence is deemed satisfactory; however, it is observed to be markedly inferior to that of human graduates in the majority of instances. Despite its potential utility in many medical areas, ChatGPT is constrained by its inherent limitations that prevent it from entirely supplanting human expertise and knowledge.