{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Hair transplantation versus scalp micropigmentation: A retrospective study of treatment selection in persons with female pattern hair loss.
{Author}: Park JH;Kim N;You SH;
{Journal}: J Cosmet Dermatol
{Volume}: 0
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 Jun 18
{Factor}: 2.189
{DOI}: 10.1111/jocd.16429
{Abstract}: <B>BACKGROUND: </B>Hair transplant (HT) is the standard treatment for female pattern hair loss (FPHL), but scalp micropigmentation (SMP) is an alternative. Currently, there are no criteria to help choose between HT and SMP.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Forty female patients with FPHL who had successfully undergone HT and SMP, were reviewed to identify factors that might help decide between treatments. Hair density (HD) and hair caliber were measured at the part line and mid-occipital region by a Folliscope. The sensitivity and specificity of HT and SMP were determined by area under the curve (AUC) and receiver operating characteristic curve.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Patients were divided into HT (n = 23) and SMP (n = 17) groups. The follicular unit density (FUD) (HT: 62.06 ± 4.8551/cm2; SMP: 66.59 ± 3.4971/cm2) and HD (HT: 96.16 ± 16.6954/cm2; SMP: 116.08 ± 17.0520/cm2) were significantly different (p < 0.01) between groups. The AUC for FUD was 77.6% with a cutoff value of 66.83 and 87.0% (1-0.412) sensitivity. The AUC for HD was 82.4% with a cutoff value of 96.17 and 69.6% (1-0.118) sensitivity.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>HD was the most important factor when deciding between HT surgery and SMP. SMP is recommended when the HD is ≥104.6 hairs/cm2 and HT surgery is strongly recommended when the HD is ≤96.17 hairs/cm2.