{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Review of dose setting for the extended one-generation reproductive toxicity studies (OECD TG 443): Considerations on ECHA's dose level selection recommendations.
{Author}: Beekhuijzen M;Richmond E;Manton J;Coder PS;Goyak K;Ghaffari R;Makris SL;Van Cruchten S;Zorrilla L;Mitchell-Ryan S;
{Journal}: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol
{Volume}: 151
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 Aug 15
{Factor}: 3.598
{DOI}: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105665
{Abstract}: During 2020, The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) began evaluating the OECD Test Guideline 443: Extended One Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study (EOGRTS) to analyze specific aspects related to study design, conduct and toxicological findings. A significant outcome of this ECHA evaluation focused on adequate dose level selection. Subsequently, ECHA published recommendations for DART studies, however, these recommendations seemingly do not align with the principles of the 3Rs, animal welfare or human safety goals, specifically, regarding three aspects. First, the requirement to segregate testing for sexual function and fertility from the ability to produce normally developing offspring increases the risk of inadequate identification of postnatal hazards for development and sexual function and fertility, therefore failing human health protection goals. Second, the current ECHA high-dose level setting recommendations for EOGRTS exceed the MTD (Maximum Tolerated Dose), and therefore compromise the interpretation of the biological response relative to the intrinsic effect of the chemical under evaluation. Third, the combination of these aspects will result in an increase in the number of animals tested, increasing animal welfare concerns. This paper reflects the consensus of subject matter experts, professional, and scientific societies who have authored and signed on to this statement. The signatories encourage ECHA to adopt a revised science-driven approach to the dose selection criteria that strikes a balance between regulatory vigilance and scientific pragmatism.