{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: A Pilot Study Describing DOAC Level Results and Association With Clinical Outcomes.
{Author}: Gochnauer B;Rodino A;Russell S;Bradley K;
{Journal}: J Pharm Pract
{Volume}: 0
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 Jun 17
暂无{DOI}: 10.1177/08971900241262363
{Abstract}: Purpose: Describe direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) level ordering and interpretation practices in association with clinical outcomes at a vascular medicine clinic. Methods: This study was a retrospective, observational study including patients who had a DOAC level ordered and assessed while on DOAC therapy. The primary outcome was the proportion of DOAC levels within previously reported ranges. Secondary outcomes included thrombotic events, major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding events, and the proportion of DOAC level results which prompted a change in the therapeutic plan. Results: A total of 43 patients who had a DOAC level ordered while on DOAC therapy were included in the study. More patients were on apixaban than other DOACs, and the most common indication for anticoagulation was deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). The most common reasons for ordering DOAC levels included history of gastric bypass (n = 20) and drug-drug interactions (n = 8). Most patients on apixaban had in-range levels (n = 24) compared to out of-range levels (5 patients). More patients on rivaroxaban had a level out-of-range (n = 10) than in-range (n = 4). One patient had a DVT, resulting in hospitalization and change in DOAC therapy. Two patients had bleeding events, with 1 hospitalization and change in DOAC therapy. DOAC level results also prompted changes in therapeutic plans for 9 of the patients. Conclusion: DOAC level results did not always correlate with expected outcomes, and further research is warranted to clarify which clinical situations may benefit from ordering DOAC levels.