{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: The Michigan Men's Diabetes Project Randomized Clinical Control Trial: A Pilot/Feasibility Study of a Peer-Led Diabetes Self-Management and Support Intervention for Black Men With Type 2 Diabetes.
{Author}: Ewen AM;Hawkins JM;Kloss KA;Nwankwo R;Funnell MM;Sengupta S;Jean Francois N;Piatt G;
{Journal}: Am J Mens Health
{Volume}: 18
{Issue}: 3
{Year}: 2024 May-Jun
{Factor}: 2.403
{DOI}: 10.1177/15579883241258318
{Abstract}: Black men are disproportionately affected by type 2 diabetes (T2D) and experience higher diabetes-related complications than non-Hispanic White men. To address the complex barriers in diabetes self-management for Black men, we implemented a 3-month peer-led and empowerment-based Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) and Support (DSMS) intervention in Metro Detroit. Twenty-five Black men ≥55 years of age with self-reported T2D were randomized to the intervention group (n=12)-10 hr of DSME and 9 hr of DSMS-or enhanced usual care (EUC) group (n=13)-10 hr of DSME. Peer leaders (n = 3) were trained by certified diabetes care and education specialists (CDCESs) to cofacilitate the support sessions. Outcomes (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c], diabetes self-care activities, and diabetes distress) were assessed preintervention and postintervention. In the intervention and EUC groups, mean HbA1c decreased by 0.20% (p = .52, SD = 0.99) and 0.13% (p = .68), respectively. General diet (p = .03, M change: 1.32, SD = 1.71) and blood glucose monitoring (p < .05, M change: 0.50, SD = 0.74) scores improved among those in the intervention group. General diet scores also improved in the EUC group: mean change: 1.77, p = .08, although changes were not statistically significant. Changes in diabetes distress scores differed based on the number of sessions attended, with a significant decrease in those attending 7 to 12 sessions (n = 7), >50%, (p = .003, M change: -5.71, SD = 3.20). Implementing a peer-led DSMS program for Black men was feasible, adopted, and led to positive changes in outcomes. Scaling up the intervention and assessing sustainability is warranted.