{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Comparison of the effects of cefmetazole and meropenem on microbiome: A pilot study.
{Author}: Hayakawa K;Saito S;Miyoshi-Akiyama T;Fukui Y;Takemoto N;Hashimoto T;Inagaki T;Hirose K;Kobayashi K;Koizumi R;Endo M;Komatsubara M;Nomoto H;Inada M;Ide S;Kamegai K;Ashida S;Nagata N;Kato H;Ohmagari N;
{Journal}: J Infect Chemother
{Volume}: 0
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 Jun 13
{Factor}: 2.065
{DOI}: 10.1016/j.jiac.2024.06.007
{Abstract}: <B>BACKGROUND: </B>Cefmetazole (CMZ) is a carbapenem-sparing option in the treatment of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacterial infection. In this pilot study, we aimed to compare the effects of antimicrobial treatment (meropenem [MP] and CMZ) with those of no antimicrobial treatment (control group) on the microbiome.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>The study was a multicenter, prospective, observational pilot study conducted from October 2020 to October 2022. Feces and saliva samples were collected for microbiome analyses at two time points (early-period: days 1-3; and late-period: days 4-30) for the antimicrobial treatment group, and at one time point for the control group.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Five feces (MP-F and CMZ-F) and five saliva (MP-S and CMZ-S) samples were included in the MP and the CMZ groups. Ten feces (C-F) and saliva (C-S) samples were included in the control group. Group α diversity was notably lower in the late-period MP-F group than the control group as determined with the Shannon richness index. β diversity analysis of the feces samples based on weighted and unweighted UniFrac distances revealed distinctions in both the late-period CMZ-F and MP-F groups compared with the control group. Weighted UniFrac analysis showed that only the early-period MP-F group differed from the control group. In the saliva samples, weighted and unweighted UniFrac analyses showed significant differences between the control group and the early CMZ, late CMZ, and late MP groups.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>MP treatment may cause larger impact on the feces microbiome than CMZ in Japanese patients.