{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: The effect of coronal plane angulation on patient reported outcome measures of operatively treated distal femur fractures: A multi-center prospective evaluation.
{Author}: Dunbar RP;Cooke M;Tornetta P; ;Born CT;Collinge C;Egol KA;Ertl JP;Friess DM;Humphrey CA;Jones CB;Mullis BH;Ostrum RF;Perez E;Phieffer L;Ricci WM;Sagi HC;Schmidt AH;Sems A;Siegel J;Teague DC;Zonno A;
{Journal}: Injury
{Volume}: 55
{Issue}: 8
{Year}: 2024 Aug 23
{Factor}: 2.687
{DOI}: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111597
{Abstract}: <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>The goal of this trial was to determine whether coronal plane angulation affects functional and clinical outcomes after the fixation of distal femur fractures.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Multicenter, randomized controlled trial SETTING: 20 academic trauma centers PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: 156 patients with distal femur fractures were enrolled. 123 patients were followed 12 months. There was clinical outcome data available for 105 patients at 3 months, 95 patients at 6 months and 81 patients at one year.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Lateral locked plating or retrograde intramedullary nailing MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Radiographic alignment, functional scoring including SMFA, Bother Index, and EQ-5D. Clinical scoring of walking ability, need for ambulatory support and ability to manage stairs.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>At 3 months, there was no difference between groups (varus, neutral or valgus) with respect to any of the clinical functional outcome scores measured. At 6 months, compared to those with neutral alignment, patients with varus angulation had a worse Stair Climbing score (4.33 vs. 2.91, p = 0.05). At 12 months, the average patient with neutral or valgus alignment needed less ambulatory support than the average patient in varus. Walking distance ability was no different between the groups at any time point. With respect to the validated patient-based outcome scores, we found no statistical difference in in the SMFA, Bother, or EQ-5D between patients with valgus or varus mal-alignment and those with neutral alignment at any time point (p > 0.05). Regardless of coronal angulation, the SMFA trended towards lower (improved) scores over time, while EQ-5D scores for patients with varus angulation did not improve over time.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Valgus angulation and neutral angulation may be better tolerated in terms of clinical outcomes like stair climbing and need for ambulatory support than varus angulation, though patient reported outcome measures like the SMFA, Bother Index and EQ-5D show no statistical significance. Most patients with distal femur fractures tend to improve during the first year after injury but many remain significantly affected at 12 months post injury.