{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Strengthening disease surveillance capacity at national level across five countries: a qualitative study.
{Author}: Meierkord A;Körner-Nahodilová L;Gotsche CI;Baruch J;Briesemeister V;Correa-Martinez CL;Hanefeld J;
{Journal}: Public Health
{Volume}: 233
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 Aug 12
{Factor}: 4.984
{DOI}: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.04.040
{Abstract}: <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>Disease surveillance is an essential component of public health and a core function of National Public Health Institutes (NPHIs), including to better prepare and respond to infectious diseases outbreaks. Strengthening NPHIs in their efforts to establish and maintain efficient surveillance systems is an opportunity to ensure future outbreak preparedness and response; yet, guidance on how to increase and prioritise capacity building efforts is limited. This study sought to investigate approaches to capacity building and training for disease surveillance at national level and understand the potential role of NPHIs.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Qualitative study.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>This is a qualitative study, based on a literature review and interviews undertaken between June and November 2022. Fifty seven in-depth interviews were conducted in five countries: Côte d'Ivoire, Ecuador, Madagascar, Namibia, and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Participants included a range of professionals from government, NPHIs, academic institutions and the private sector. Interviews were thematically analysed.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Selected countries varied in terms of their disease surveillance capacities, as well as in the structure of their surveillance systems and decision-making. Research identified shared priority areas for action at national level, identifying common challenges and opportunities: 1) capacity building, here specifically the need for a training agenda at national level to ensure sustainability and guide donor funded training offers; 2) data tools and technology-to help decision-makers select the best software tool to address countries' identified need; 3) data sharing-the need for clear data sharing standards and norms for national to international data sharing; and 4) genomic sequencing-the need for national genomic surveillance strategies and reporting guidelines.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Addressing challenges and using opportunities to strengthen disease surveillance at national level is an important step to build capacity in this area and to help prevent future epidemic and pandemics globally. The findings of this study help decision-makers to identify priority areas for capacity building and understand the potential role and significance of NPHIs.