{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Management and outcomes of cerebrovascular injuries after gunshot wounds to the cervical spine.
{Author}: Wathen C;Santangelo G;Muhammad N;Ellens N;Catanzaro S;Singh A;Dagli MM;Petrov D;Ozturk AK;Bender M;Stone JJ;Schuster J;
{Journal}: Clin Neurol Neurosurg
{Volume}: 243
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 Aug 7
{Factor}: 1.885
{DOI}: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108376
{Abstract}: <B>METHODS: </B>This study was a multicenter retrospective analysis of cervical spine gunshot wound (GSW) patients.<BR><B>OBJECTIVE: </B>The present study was conducted to evaluate the management and outcomes of vascular injuries following GSW involving the cervical spine.<BR><B>BACKGROUND: </B>Gunshot wounds (GSW) injuring the cervical spine are associated with high rates of vascular injury.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Charts of patients with GSW involving the cervical spine at two Level 1 trauma centers were reviewed from 2010 to 2021 for demographics, injury characteristics, management and follow-up. Statistical analysis included T tests and ANOVA for comparisons of continuous variables and chi-square testing for categorical variables, non-parametric tests were used when indicated. Beta-binomial models were used to estimate the probabilities outcomes. Bayesian regression models were utilized to compute risk ratios (RR) and their 95 % confidence intervals (CI) to enhance the inferential robustness.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>40 patients with cervical spine GSW and associated cerebrovascular injury were included in our analysis. 15 % of patients had Biffl grade (BG) V injuries, 50 % grade IV, and 35 % grade III-I. Angiography was performed in 35 % of patients. 5 of these patients (BG V-III) required endovascular treatment for pseudoaneurysm obliteration or parent vessel sacrifice. 7 patients (22 %) showed evidence of progression. 70 % of patients were placed on antiplatelet therapy for stroke prevention. Bayesian regression models with a skeptical prior for cerebral ischemia revealed a mean RR of 4.82 (95 % CI 1.02-14.48) in the BG V group, 0.75 (95 % CI 0.13-2.26) in the BG IV group, and 0.61 (95 % CI 0.06-2.01) in the combined BG III-I group. For demise the mean RR was 3.41 (95 % CI 0.58-10.65) in the BG V group and 1.69 (95 % CI 0.29-5.97) in the BG IV group. In the high BG (V, IV) group, 54.55 % of patients treated with antiplatelet therapy had complications. None of the patients that were treated with antiplatelet therapy in the low BG (III-I) group had complications.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Cervical spine GSWs are associated with high-grade vascular injuries and may require early endovascular intervention. Additionally, a high rate of injury progression was seen on follow up imaging, requiring subsequent intervention. Reintervention and demise were common and observed in high BG (V, IV) groups. The incidence of stroke was low, especially in low BG (I-III) groups, suggesting that daily aspirin prophylaxis is adequate for long-term stroke prevention.