{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Usability of mechanical assistive technologies for performing activities involving the upper extremities in individuals with impairments: a systematic review.
{Author}: Atigossou OLG;Demers MH;Paquet MP;Bradet-Levesque I;Campeau-Lecours A;Routhier F;Flamand VH;
{Journal}: Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol
{Volume}: 0
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 Jun 12
{Factor}: 1.834
{DOI}: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2356833
{Abstract}: <B>UNASSIGNED: </B>To conduct a systematic review on the impacts of using mechanical assistive devices on function, performance in activities and participation of persons with upper extremity impairments, and to synthesize the strengths and limitations of these devices.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Three independent reviewers conducted systematic searches of articles published between 2003 and 2023 in Compendex, Inspec, Embase, PubMed/Medline, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science, as well as manual searches on the RESNA website for conference papers over the same period. The methodological quality of articles was appraised using the QualSyst tool.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>From the 34 retained studies, 28 mechanical devices were identified and classified into two categories: (1) mobile arm supports (MASs) designed to perform multiple activities, and (2) devices used to assist with a specific activity of daily living (ADL). Overall, MASs helped users to perform manual activities in elevation and/or against gravity. Specific ADL devices allowed users to perform unique activities requiring fine motor skills such as opening a medicine container. Some of these devices have advantages like portability, adaptability, low cost, and ease of use. Limitations most often reported included interference or mobility restraints.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>This review synthesizes the impacts of mechanical devices on the three domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) for individuals with upper extremity impairments. Impacts regarding function and performance in activities were more often measured than participation. Future studies should include outcomes related to participation, as taking this aspect into account might favor successful continued use of assistive devices.<BR>Mechanical mobile arm supports can compensate for upper extremity muscle weakness and help users to perform diverse activities against gravity, including self-care, productivity and leisure activities.Mechanical assistive devices designed for specific activities of daily living (ADLs) can increase users’ ability to perform activities requiring manual dexterity and fine motor skills, such as eating, handwriting, performing personal care or playing a musical instrument.Portability, adaptability, low cost, and ease of use are most often reported as strengths of specific ADL devices, while interference and mobility restrictions are aspects that still need to be reduced with respect to mechanical mobile arm supports.