{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: An Assessment of the Quality of Competence Restoration Research.
{Author}: Candilis PJ;Parker GF;
{Journal}: J Am Acad Psychiatry Law
{Volume}: 52
{Issue}: 2
{Year}: 2024 Jun 4
{Factor}: 2.807
{DOI}: 10.29158/JAAPL.240008-24
{Abstract}: A systematic review of the literature on restoration of competence to stand trial identified a predominance of retrospective case studies using descriptive and correlational statistics. Guided by National Institutes of Health (NIH) quality metrics and emphasizing study design, sample size, and statistical methods, the authors categorized a large majority of studies as fair in quality, underscoring the need for controlled designs, larger representative samples, and more sophisticated statistical analyses. Implications for the state of forensic research include the need to use large databases within jurisdictions and the importance of reliable methods that can be applied across jurisdictions and aggregated for meta-analysis. More sophisticated research methods can be advanced in forensic fellowship training where coordinated projects and curricula can encourage systematic approaches to forensic research.